Advertisement

Online Communities and Interactions

  • Gráinne Conole
Chapter
Part of the Explorations in the Learning Sciences, Instructional Systems and Performance Technologies book series (LSIS, volume 4)

Abstract

This chapter considers the ways in which social and participatory media can be used in education. In particular, it looks at the nature of online interactions and communities. It argues that new forms of more distributed, loose communities are emerging, which require new ways of describing and evaluating them. This chapter describes some of the most common e-learning pedagogies and looks at examples of how technologies can be used to instantiate these. This chapter introduces a community indicator framework (CIF) that we have developed to design and evaluate online spaces and to understand emergent user behaviour in them. This chapter explores the range of user interactions that are now evident in such online spaces, ranging from individual interactions with resources to engagement with distributed networks and online communities. It argues that new approaches, such as the open learning design methodology introduced in this book, are needed if these online environments are going to be effective in supporting more participatory approaches to learning.

Keywords

Social Networking Site Online Community Online Interaction Open Educational Resource Online Space 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alevizou, G., Conole, G., & Galley, R. (2010). Using Cloudworks to support OER Activities. Report for the HE Academy. Milton Keynes: The Open University.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, T. (2003). Modes of interaction in distance education: Recent developments and research questions. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, P. (2007, February). What is web2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. Citesser, JISC Technology. Standards watch. Available online at http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
  4. Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., et al. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3–4), 1330136.Google Scholar
  5. Butcher, P. (2008, July 8–9). Online assessment at the Open University using open source software: Moodle, OpenMark and more. Paper presented at the 12th International CAA Conference, Loughborough.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, A. P. (1985). The symbolic construction of community. London: Tavistock.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Conole, G. (2010). Review of pedagogical frameworks and models and their use in e-learning. Retrieved from http://cloudworks.ac.uk/cloud/view/2982. Accessed 11 Aug 2012.
  8. Conole, G., Dyke, M., Oliver, M., & Seale, J. (2004, August–September). Mapping pedagogy and tools for effective learning design. Computers in Education, 43(1–2), 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Corso, M., Martini, A., & Balocco, R. (2008). Organising for continuous innovation: The community of practice approach. International Journal of Technology Management, 44(3/4), 441–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Downes, S. (2005). E-learning 2.0. eLearn Magazine, 2005(10). Available online at http://www.elearnmag.org/subpage.cfm?section=articlesandarticle=29-1. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.
  11. Downes, S. (2007, June 25–26). An introduction to connective knowledge. Paper presented at the Media, Knowledge and Education – Exploring new Spaces, Relations and Dynamics in Digital Media Ecologies, Vienna.Google Scholar
  12. Dron, J., & Anderson, T. (2007). Collectives, networks and groups in social software for e-Learning. Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education Quebec. Retrieved Feb (Vol. 16, pp. 2008).Google Scholar
  13. Dyke, M., Conole, E., Ravenscroft, A., & de Freitas, S. (2007). Learning theories and their application to e-learning. In G. Conole & M. Oliver (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research: Theories, methods and impact on practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Dyke, M., Conole, G., Ravenscroft, A., & de Freitas, S. (2007). Learning theories and their application to e-learning. In G. Conole & M. Oliver (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research: Theories, methods and impact on practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Fischer, G. (2001). Communities of Interest: Learning through the interaction of multiple knowledge systems. Paper presented at the 24th Annual Information Systems Seminar Ulvik, Norway.Google Scholar
  16. Galley, R. (2010). A framework of community indicators for online environments. Milton Keynes: The Open University.Google Scholar
  17. Galley, R., Conole, G., & Alevizou, P. (2012). Community indicators: A framework for building and evaluating community activity on Cloudworks. Interactive Learning Environments. (pp 1–23).Google Scholar
  18. Garrison, D. R. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.Google Scholar
  20. Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Godwin-Jones, R. (2003). Blogs and wikis: Environments for online collaboration. Language learning and technology 7(2), 12–16. Available online at http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/emerging/default.html. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.
  22. Hatzipanagos, S., & Warburton, S. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of research on social software and developing community ontologies. Hershey: IGI.Google Scholar
  23. Hawthornthwaite, C. (2002). Building social networks via computer networks: Creating and sustaining distributed learning communities. In K. A. Renninger & W. Shumar (Eds.), Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace (pp. 159–190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hillman, D. C., Willis, D. J., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1994). Learner-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Irwin, T. (1985). Aristotle Nicomachean ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  26. Jarvis, P. (2004). Adult education and lifelong learning. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  27. Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A. J., & Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st Century, MacArthur commissioned report. Available online http://digitallearning.macfound.org/atf/cf/%7B7E45C7E0-A3E0-4B89-AC9C-E807E1B0AE4E%7D/JENKINS_WHITE_PAPER.PDF. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.
  29. Jonassen, D. H. (2005). Design of constructivist learning environments. Retrieved from http://www.coe.missouri.edu/%7Ejonassen/courses/CLE/index.html. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.
  30. Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning to solve problems with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River: Merrill Publishing.Google Scholar
  31. Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies (2nd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Mason, R., & Rennie, F. (2008). E-learning and social networking handbook: Resources for higher education. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Mayes, T., & De Freitas, S. (2004). Review of e-learning frameworks, models and theories, JISC e-learning models desk study. Available online at http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/Stage%202%20Learning%20Models%20(Version%201).pdf. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.
  36. McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. (Eds.). (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in a Web 2.0 era. Proceedings of the ASCILITE conference, (pp. 664–675). Singapore. Available online at http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/mcloughlin.pdf. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.
  37. McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McNaught, C. (2010). Enduring themes and new horizons for educational technology, keynote presentation. Edmedia conference, Toronto, Canada, 28th June–2nd July 2010.Google Scholar
  39. Mcylopedia. (n.d.). E-learning and social interaction. From http://wiki.media-culture.org.au/index.php/E-Learning_-_Social_Interaction. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.
  40. Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Merrill, M. D. (2009). First principles of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional design theories and models (Vol. III). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  42. Moore, M. (1989). Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. O’Donoghue, J. (Ed.). (2010). Technology-supported environments for personalized learning: Methods and case studies. Hershey: IGI Global Publishers.Google Scholar
  44. O’Reilly, T. (2004). The architecture of participation. http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/articles/architecture_of_participation.html. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.
  45. O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0 – Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. http://oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-Web-20.html. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.
  46. Preece, J. (2000). Online communities: Designing usability, supporting sociability. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  47. Preece, J. (2001). Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and measuring success. Information Technology Journal, 20(5), 347–365.Google Scholar
  48. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling along. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  49. Ravenscroft, A. (2004). From conditioning to learning communities: Implications of fifty years of research in e-learning interaction design. ALT-J, 11(3), 4–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Salmon, G. (2003). E-moderating. The key to teaching and learning on line. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  51. Salmon, G. (2004). E-tivities – The key to active online learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Scanlon, E., Anastopoulou, S., Kerawalla, L., & Mulholland, P. (2012). How to use technology to represent and support students understanding of personal inquiry across contexts. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.Google Scholar
  53. Seely Brown, J., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  54. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4.Google Scholar
  55. Siemens, G. (2002. October 8). Interaction. http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/Interaction.htm. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.
  56. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.Google Scholar
  57. Stefani, L., Mason, R., & Pegler, C. (2007). The educational potential of e-portfolios: Supporting personal development and reflective learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Sutton, L. (1999). Interaction. Available online at http://seamonkey.ed.asu.edu/∼mcisaac/emc703/leah5.html. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.
  59. Wagner, E. D. (1994). In support of a functional definition of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 6–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Learning in doing: Social, cognitive, and computational perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Wenger, E. (2001). Supporting communities of practice: A survey of community-oriented technologies. Available online at http://www.ewenger.com/tech/. Accessed 7 Sept 2011.
  62. Wills, S., Leight, E., & Ip, A. (2010). The power of role-based e-learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Wittel, A. (2001). Toward a networked sociality, Theory, Culture and Society, 18(6).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gráinne Conole
    • 1
  1. 1.Beyond Distance Research AllianceUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations