Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Online Communities and Interactions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Designing for Learning in an Open World

  • 2745 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter considers the ways in which social and participatory media can be used in education. In particular, it looks at the nature of online interactions and communities. It argues that new forms of more distributed, loose communities are emerging, which require new ways of describing and evaluating them. This chapter describes some of the most common e-learning pedagogies and looks at examples of how technologies can be used to instantiate these. This chapter introduces a community indicator framework (CIF) that we have developed to design and evaluate online spaces and to understand emergent user behaviour in them. This chapter explores the range of user interactions that are now evident in such online spaces, ranging from individual interactions with resources to engagement with distributed networks and online communities. It argues that new approaches, such as the open learning design methodology introduced in this book, are needed if these online environments are going to be effective in supporting more participatory approaches to learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Adapted from Conole (2010).

  2. 2.

    http://www.eportfoliopractice.qut.edu.au/

  3. 3.

    http://www.open.ac.uk/openmarkexamples/

  4. 4.

    http://www.pi-project.ac.uk/

  5. 5.

    http://www.nquire.org.uk/

  6. 6.

    http://www.glomaker.org/

  7. 7.

    http://www.apple.com/education/itunes-u/

  8. 8.

    http://elearningtech.blogspot.com/2010/03/twitter-for-learning-55-great-articles.html

  9. 9.

    Adapted from Sfard (1998)

  10. 10.

    This is discussed in more detail in Chapter 6.

  11. 11.

    Screenshot from http://www.atimod.com/e-moderating/5stage.shtml

  12. 12.

    http://cloudworks.ac.uk

References

  • Alevizou, G., Conole, G., & Galley, R. (2010). Using Cloudworks to support OER Activities. Report for the HE Academy. Milton Keynes: The Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T. (2003). Modes of interaction in distance education: Recent developments and research questions. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. (2007, February). What is web2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. Citesser, JISC Technology. Standards watch. Available online at http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.

  • Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., et al. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3–4), 1330136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, P. (2008, July 8–9). Online assessment at the Open University using open source software: Moodle, OpenMark and more. Paper presented at the 12th International CAA Conference, Loughborough.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. P. (1985). The symbolic construction of community. London: Tavistock.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Conole, G. (2010). Review of pedagogical frameworks and models and their use in e-learning. Retrieved from http://cloudworks.ac.uk/cloud/view/2982. Accessed 11 Aug 2012.

  • Conole, G., Dyke, M., Oliver, M., & Seale, J. (2004, August–September). Mapping pedagogy and tools for effective learning design. Computers in Education, 43(1–2), 17–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corso, M., Martini, A., & Balocco, R. (2008). Organising for continuous innovation: The community of practice approach. International Journal of Technology Management, 44(3/4), 441–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downes, S. (2005). E-learning 2.0. eLearn Magazine, 2005(10). Available online at http://www.elearnmag.org/subpage.cfm?section=articlesandarticle=29-1. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.

  • Downes, S. (2007, June 25–26). An introduction to connective knowledge. Paper presented at the Media, Knowledge and Education – Exploring new Spaces, Relations and Dynamics in Digital Media Ecologies, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dron, J., & Anderson, T. (2007). Collectives, networks and groups in social software for e-Learning. Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education Quebec. Retrieved Feb (Vol. 16, pp. 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyke, M., Conole, E., Ravenscroft, A., & de Freitas, S. (2007). Learning theories and their application to e-learning. In G. Conole & M. Oliver (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research: Theories, methods and impact on practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyke, M., Conole, G., Ravenscroft, A., & de Freitas, S. (2007). Learning theories and their application to e-learning. In G. Conole & M. Oliver (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research: Theories, methods and impact on practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G. (2001). Communities of Interest: Learning through the interaction of multiple knowledge systems. Paper presented at the 24th Annual Information Systems Seminar Ulvik, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galley, R. (2010). A framework of community indicators for online environments. Milton Keynes: The Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galley, R., Conole, G., & Alevizou, P. (2012). Community indicators: A framework for building and evaluating community activity on Cloudworks. Interactive Learning Environments. (pp 1–23).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin-Jones, R. (2003). Blogs and wikis: Environments for online collaboration. Language learning and technology 7(2), 12–16. Available online at http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/emerging/default.html. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.

  • Hatzipanagos, S., & Warburton, S. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of research on social software and developing community ontologies. Hershey: IGI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawthornthwaite, C. (2002). Building social networks via computer networks: Creating and sustaining distributed learning communities. In K. A. Renninger & W. Shumar (Eds.), Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace (pp. 159–190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, D. C., Willis, D. J., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1994). Learner-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 30–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, T. (1985). Aristotle Nicomachean ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, P. (2004). Adult education and lifelong learning. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A. J., & Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st Century, MacArthur commissioned report. Available online http://digitallearning.macfound.org/atf/cf/%7B7E45C7E0-A3E0-4B89-AC9C-E807E1B0AE4E%7D/JENKINS_WHITE_PAPER.PDF. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.

  • Jonassen, D. H. (2005). Design of constructivist learning environments. Retrieved from http://www.coe.missouri.edu/%7Ejonassen/courses/CLE/index.html. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.

  • Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning to solve problems with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River: Merrill Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies (2nd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R., & Rennie, F. (2008). E-learning and social networking handbook: Resources for higher education. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayes, T., & De Freitas, S. (2004). Review of e-learning frameworks, models and theories, JISC e-learning models desk study. Available online at http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/Stage%202%20Learning%20Models%20(Version%201).pdf. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.

  • McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. (Eds.). (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in a Web 2.0 era. Proceedings of the ASCILITE conference, (pp. 664–675). Singapore. Available online at http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/mcloughlin.pdf. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.

  • McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNaught, C. (2010). Enduring themes and new horizons for educational technology, keynote presentation. Edmedia conference, Toronto, Canada, 28th June–2nd July 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcylopedia. (n.d.). E-learning and social interaction. From http://wiki.media-culture.org.au/index.php/E-Learning_-_Social_Interaction. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.

  • Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. (2009). First principles of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional design theories and models (Vol. III). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. (1989). Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donoghue, J. (Ed.). (2010). Technology-supported environments for personalized learning: Methods and case studies. Hershey: IGI Global Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, T. (2004). The architecture of participation. http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/articles/architecture_of_participation.html. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.

  • O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0 – Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. http://oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-Web-20.html. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.

  • Preece, J. (2000). Online communities: Designing usability, supporting sociability. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preece, J. (2001). Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and measuring success. Information Technology Journal, 20(5), 347–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling along. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravenscroft, A. (2004). From conditioning to learning communities: Implications of fifty years of research in e-learning interaction design. ALT-J, 11(3), 4–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, G. (2003). E-moderating. The key to teaching and learning on line. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, G. (2004). E-tivities – The key to active online learning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, E., Anastopoulou, S., Kerawalla, L., & Mulholland, P. (2012). How to use technology to represent and support students understanding of personal inquiry across contexts. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seely Brown, J., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens, G. (2002. October 8). Interaction. http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/Interaction.htm. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.

  • Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefani, L., Mason, R., & Pegler, C. (2007). The educational potential of e-portfolios: Supporting personal development and reflective learning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, L. (1999). Interaction. Available online at http://seamonkey.ed.asu.edu/∼mcisaac/emc703/leah5.html. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.

  • Wagner, E. D. (1994). In support of a functional definition of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 6–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Learning in doing: Social, cognitive, and computational perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (2001). Supporting communities of practice: A survey of community-oriented technologies. Available online at http://www.ewenger.com/tech/. Accessed 7 Sept 2011.

  • Wills, S., Leight, E., & Ip, A. (2010). The power of role-based e-learning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittel, A. (2001). Toward a networked sociality, Theory, Culture and Society, 18(6).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Beyond Distance Research Alliance, University of Leicester, 103–105 Princess Road East, Leicester, UK

    GrĂ¡inne Conole

Authors
  1. GrĂ¡inne Conole
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Conole, G. (2012). Online Communities and Interactions. In: Designing for Learning in an Open World. Explorations in the Learning Sciences, Instructional Systems and Performance Technologies, vol 4. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8517-0_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation