Realising the Vision of Open Educational Resources

  • Gráinne Conole
Part of the Explorations in the Learning Sciences, Instructional Systems and Performance Technologies book series (LSIS, volume 4)


Despite the vision behind the open educational resource (OER) movement and the considerable investments in OER work, uptake, use and reuse by teachers and learners have been disappointing. This chapter explores ways in which we might address this issue, drawing on current work under two initiatives, OLnet and OPAL.


Social Networking Site Learning Management System Open Educational Resource Opal Initiative Partnership Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Alevizou, P., Conole, G., & Galley, R. (2010). Using Cloudworks to support OER activities, An HE Academy commissioned report. Milton Keynes: The Open University.Google Scholar
  2. Borgeman, C. L., Abelson, H., Dirks, L., Johnson, R., Koedinger, K., Linn, M. C., Lynch, C. A., Oblinger, D. G., Pea, R. D., Salen, K., Smith, M., & Azalay, A. (2008). Fostering learning in the networked world: the cyberlearning opportunity and challenge. Report of the NSF task force on cyberlearning. Available online at Accessed 7 Oct 2011.
  3. Conole, G., & Culver, J. (2009). Cloudworks: Social networking for learning design. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology (AJET) 25(5), 763–782. Available online at Accessed 7 Oct 2011.
  4. Conole, G., & Culver, J. (2010). The design of Cloudworks: Applying social networking practice to foster the exchange of learning and teaching ideas and designs. Computers in Education, 54(3), 679–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Conole, G., & McAndrew, P. (2010). A new approach to supporting the design and use of OER: Harnessing the power of Web 2.0. In M. Ebner & M. Schiefner (Eds.), Looking toward the future of technology enhanced education: Ubiquitous learning and the digital nature. Hershey: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  6. Conole, G., Brasher, A., Cross, S., Weller, M., Clark, P., & White, J. (2008). Visualising learning design to foster and support good practice and creativity. Educational Media International, 45(3), 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Conole, G., McAndrew, P., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2010). The role of CSCL pedagogical patterns as mediating artefacts for repurposing Open Educational Resources. In F. Pozzi & D. Persico (Eds.), Techniques for fostering collaboration in online learning communities: Theoretical and practical (pp. 206–223). Hershey: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Liddo, A., & Buckingham Shum, S. (2010). Cohere: A prototype for contested collective intelligence, Workshop: Collective intelligence in organizations – Toward a research agenda. Paper presented at the ACM Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2010), Savannah, Georgia.Google Scholar
  9. Downes, S. (2007). Models for sustainable open educational resources. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects 3, 29–44. Available online at Accessed 7 Oct 2011.
  10. Ehlers, U. D. (2011). Open educational quality initiative – Midterm Report. Essen: University of Duisburg-Essen.Google Scholar
  11. Engeström, J. (2005). Why some social network services work and others don’t — Or: The case for object-centered sociality %U Accessed 7 Oct 2011.
  12. Engeström, J. (2007). Microblogging – Tiny social objects on the future of participatory media, cited in K. Anderson, blog entry June, 2007. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.
  13. McAndrew, P. (2011, October 2–5). Adapting open educational resources: Lessons, issues and methods, ICDE conference, Bali. Available online at Accessed 7 Oct 2011.
  14. McAndrew, P., & Thille, C. (2009). Proposal to the William and Flora Hewlett foundation to establish the Olnet initiative. Milton Keynes: The Open University.Google Scholar
  15. McAndrew, P., & Wilson, T. (2008). Pocketing the difference: joint development of Open Educational Resources. Paper presented at the Advanced Learning Technologys, ICALT 2008, Eighth international conference on advanced learning technologies, Santander.Google Scholar
  16. McAndrew, P., Santos, A., Lane, A., Godwin, S., Okada, A., Wilson, T., Connolly, T., Ferreira, G., Buckingham Shum, S., Bretts, J., & Webb, R. (2009). OpenLearn research report 2006–2008. Milton Keynes: The Open University.Google Scholar
  17. Nakki, P., Back, A., Ropponen, T., Kronqvist, J., Hintikka, K. A., Harju, A., Poyhtari, R., & Kola, P. (2011). Social media for citizen participation – Report on the Somus project, Accessed 7 Oct 2011.
  18. OPAL. (2010). D3.1: Desk research and case study identification. OPAL project report. Available online at Accessed 7 Oct 2011.
  19. Thompson, G. F. (n.d.). Fordism, post-fordism and the flexible system of production. From Accessed 11 Aug 2012.
  20. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. learning, meaning and identity. Learning in doing: Social, cognitive, and computational perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gráinne Conole
    • 1
  1. 1.Beyond Distance Research AllianceUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations