The Human Security Dilemma
Human security discourse and practice have been embraced by a number of States as a means to address our current security dilemmas. At the same time, human security literature is advanced as an alternative vision of world politics that moves past the State-centric analysis of traditional security studies. What is unclear is whether these two aspects of human security, its practice and intent, are compatible. There are two related questions that must then be addressed. The first is whether human security practice has actually benefited peoples, which will be approached by exploring the types of policies that have been put in place in the name of human security. This then brings up the second, and perhaps more profound, question: has the adoption of human security frameworks had the effect of changing the way that we “do” security policy, or has it merely widened the range of issues to which traditional security practices are applied? This paper will draw examples predominately from the current international involvement in Afghanistan.
KeywordsHuman security Canada critical security studies peacebuilding securitization
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Axworthy, L., 2001, Human security and global governance: Putting people first, Glob. Gov. 7(1):19–23.Google Scholar
- Booth, K. (ed.), 2005, Critical Security Studies and World Politics, Lynne Rienner, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
- Bowes, R., 2001, Sacrifice and the categorical imperative of human security, Int. J. 56(4):649–664.Google Scholar
- Busumtwi-Sam, J., 2002, Development and human security, Int. J. 53(2):253–272.Google Scholar
- Commission on Human Security, 2002, Report of the Third Meeting of the Commission on Human Security, Haga Castle, Stockholm, 9–10 June.Google Scholar
- McNerney, M. J., 2005–06, Stabilization and reconstruction in Afghanistan: Are PRTs a model or a muddle? Parameters (Winter): 32–46.Google Scholar
- Tomlinson, B., 2002, Defending humane internationalism: The role of Canadian NGOs in a security-conscious era, Int. J. 57(2):273–282.Google Scholar
- Wæver, O., 2004, Aberystwyth, Paris, Copenhagen New Schools in Security Theory and the Origins between Core and Periphery, Paper presented at the International Studies Association (ISA) Annual Conference, Montreal, March.Google Scholar