Skip to main content

The Human Security Dilemma

Lost Opportunities, Appropriated Concepts, or Actual Change?

  • Conference paper
Environmental Change and Human Security: Recognizing and Acting on Hazard Impacts

Human security discourse and practice have been embraced by a number of States as a means to address our current security dilemmas. At the same time, human security literature is advanced as an alternative vision of world politics that moves past the State-centric analysis of traditional security studies. What is unclear is whether these two aspects of human security, its practice and intent, are compatible. There are two related questions that must then be addressed. The first is whether human security practice has actually benefited peoples, which will be approached by exploring the types of policies that have been put in place in the name of human security. This then brings up the second, and perhaps more profound, question: has the adoption of human security frameworks had the effect of changing the way that we “do” security policy, or has it merely widened the range of issues to which traditional security practices are applied? This paper will draw examples predominately from the current international involvement in Afghanistan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Axworthy, L., 2001, Human security and global governance: Putting people first, Glob. Gov. 7(1):19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behnke, A., 2006, No way out: Desecuritization, emancipation and the eternal return of the political—a reply to Aradau, J. Int. Rel. Dev. 9(1):62–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, K. (ed.), 2005, Critical Security Studies and World Politics, Lynne Rienner, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowes, R., 2001, Sacrifice and the categorical imperative of human security, Int. J. 56(4):649–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busumtwi-Sam, J., 2002, Development and human security, Int. J. 53(2):253–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Human Security, 2002, Report of the Third Meeting of the Commission on Human Security, Haga Castle, Stockholm, 9–10 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, K., 2003, Securitization and the boomerang debate: A rejoinder to Liotta and Smith-Windsor, Secur. Dialogue 34(3):337–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liotta, P. H., 2002, Boomerang effect: The convergence of national and human security, Secur. Dialogue 33(4):473–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLean, G., 2000, Instituting and projecting human security: A Canadian perspective, Aust. J. Int. Aff. 54(3):269–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNerney, M. J., 2005–06, Stabilization and reconstruction in Afghanistan: Are PRTs a model or a muddle? Parameters (Winter): 32–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, E., 2001, Human security and constructivism, Int. Stud. Persp. 2(3):239–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, R., 2001, Human security: Paradigm shift or hot air? Int. Security 26(2):87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, B. R., 2006, Peace building and state-building in Afghanistan: Constructing sovereignty for whose security? Third World Q. 27(1):175–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slim, H., 2001, Violence and humanitarianism: Moral paradox and the protection of civilians, Secur. Dialogue 32(3):325–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taureck, R., 2006, Securitization theory and securitization studies, J. Int. Rel. Dev. 9(1):53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, B., 2002, Defending humane internationalism: The role of Canadian NGOs in a security-conscious era, Int. J. 57(2):273–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wæver, O., 2004, Aberystwyth, Paris, Copenhagen New Schools in Security Theory and the Origins between Core and Periphery, Paper presented at the International Studies Association (ISA) Annual Conference, Montreal, March.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this paper

Cite this paper

Christie, R. (2008). The Human Security Dilemma. In: Liotta, P.H., Mouat, D.A., Kepner, W.G., Lancaster, J.M. (eds) Environmental Change and Human Security: Recognizing and Acting on Hazard Impacts. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8551-2_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics