Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Perception and Measurement of Transaction Costs

  • Chapter
International Business

Abstract

The chapter discusses various explanations of how transaction cost-minimising corporate configurations come about. It contrasts Darwinian with rational explanations, finding both unsatisfactory. What matters, rather than computation of fully recognised transaction costs, are managerial perceptions of transaction costs. These perceptions are not expressed in numbers, but in language. This is related to arguments derived from bounded rationality and from transaction cost economics. The chapter argues that issues of managerial perception must become central to analysis. Existing academic traditions which accord primacy to perception and to language are drawn upon, and argued to be of great relevance to future work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aldrich, H. E. and Marsden, P. V. (1988) ‘Environments and Organizations’, in N.J. Smelser (ed.), Handbook of Sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amelung, T. ( 1994) ‘The impact of transaction costs on trade flows in the Asia Pacific’, in R. Garnaut and P. Drysdale (eds), Asia Pacific Regionalism. Pymble, NSW, Australia: Harper Educational.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. and Coughlan, A. (1987) ‘International market entry and expansion via independent and integrated channels of distribution’, journal of Marketing, 51 (January), 71-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. and Gatignon, H. (1986) ‘Modes of foreign entry: a transaction cost analysis and propositions’, journal of International Business Studies, Fall, 1-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardener, E. (1974) ‘Social anthropology and population’, in H. B. Parry (ed.), Population and its Problems. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 25-50 (reprinted in Ardener, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardener, E. (1989) The Voice of Prophecy and Other Essays by E. W. Ardener (ed.)M. Chapman. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R. (1983) Ryond Objectivism and Relativism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. (1994) ‘What makes them merge?’ Scrip Maga;:Jne, October, 3--4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. and Casson, M. (1976) The Future of the Multinational Enterprise. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. and Casson, M. (1990) Introduction, The Future of the Multinational Enterprise, 2nd edn. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P., Pass, C. and Prescott, K (1993) ‘Foreign market servicing by multinationals: an integrated approach’, in P. Buckley and P. Ghauri (eds), The InternationaliQltion of the Firm London: Academic Press. Casson, M. (1991) The Economics of Business Culture. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, M. (1992) ‘Social and biological aspects of ethnicity’, in M. Chapman (ed.), Social and Biological Aspects of Ethnicity. Oxford: Oxford University Press (Biosocial Society Monograph Series, vol. 4), 1-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L. E. (1986) ‘Comment on Wallis and North’, inS. L Engerman and R E. Gallman (eds), Long Term Factors in American Economic Growth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R (1976) The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1986) The Blind Watchmaker. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delacroix, J. (1993) ‘The European subsidiaries of American Multinationals: an exercise in econological analysis’, inS. Ghoshal and D. E. Westney (eds), OrganiQltion Theory and the Multinational Corporation. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (ed.) ( 1969) Witchcraft Conftssions and Accusations. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douma, S. and Schreuder, H. (1991) Economic Approaches to OrganiQltions. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice-Hall International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1953) ‘The methodology of positive economics’, in Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilgore, S. (1994) ‘The way forward - innovate and communicate’, Scrip Maga;jne, December, 54-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. L. and Hitch, C.J. (1951) ‘Price theory and business behaviour’, in T. Wilson and P. W. S. Andrews (eds), Oxford Studies in the Price Mechanism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1964) ‘The genetical evolution of social behaviour’, journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1, 1-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M. and Champy, J. (1995) Eengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution (revised edn). London: Nicholas Brealey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. and Freeman, J. (1989) OrganiQltional Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. M. (1993a) Economics and Evolution: Bringing Lift Back into Economics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. M. (1993b) ‘The Mecca of Alfred Marshall’, Economic journal 103, 406-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. M. (1994) ‘Optimisation and evolution: Winter’s critique of Friedman revisited’, Cambridge journal of Economics, 18, 413-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, M. and Lukes, S. (eds) (1982) Rationality and Relativism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, Rand Finnegan, R. (eds) (1973) Models of Thought. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Industrial and Corporate Change, 3, 3 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, Y. (1989) ‘Firm specific strategic advantages and foreign direct investment behavior of firms’ ,journal oflnternational Business Studies, 10, 2, 296-314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobrin, S.J., Basek,J., Blank, S. and La Palombara,J. (1980) ‘The assessment and evaluation of noneconomic environments by American firms: a preliminary report’, journal of International Business Studies, 11, 32-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1993) ‘Knowledge of the firm and evolutionary theory’, journal of International Business Studies, 24, 4, 625-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krickx, G. A. ( 1995) ‘Vertical integration in the computer mainframe industry: a transaction cost interpretation’, journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, 26, 1, 75-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, A. 0. (1936) The Great Chain of Being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, B. R (1995) ‘Specific investment, economies of scale, and the make-orbuy decision: a test of transaction cost theory’, journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, 26, 3, 431-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. (1986) The Rhetoric of Economics. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1966) The Theory of Evolution, 2nd edn (1st edn, 1958). Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. and Roberts, J. (1992) Economics, OrganiQltion and Management. Englewood Cliffs, J:IIT: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaidis, C. (1994) ‘The law of the jungle: an evolutionary perspective on competition and cooperation in international business’, in The Changing European Environment, conference proceedings, Academy of International Business, UK conference, UMIST, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overing,J. (ed.) (1985) Reason and Morality. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkin, D. (ed.) (1982) Semantic Anthropology. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. (1952) ‘Biological analogies in the theory of the firm’, American Economic Review, 42, 804-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peppard,J. and Rowland, P. (1995) The Essence of Business Process Eengineering. New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1994) The Language Instinct. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R D. (1978) International Business Management: A Guide to Decision Making. Hinsdale: Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. (1993) ‘Altruism as a problem involving group versus individual selection in economics and biology’, American Economic Review, 83, 2, 143- 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1957) Models of Man. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1993) ‘Altruism and Economics’, American Economic Review, 83, 2, 156-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soloman, H. (1994) ‘The fashion for change’, Scrip Magazine, September, p. 19 (the cited quotations are from Scrip Magazine, itself citing from the 1994 annual report ofF orest Laboratories, of which Howard Soloman is President and Chief Executive Officer, or CEO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. and Pisano, G. (1994) ‘The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 3, 537-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teubner, G. (1993) Law as an Autopoietic System. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vromen, J. ( 1995) Economic Evolution: An Enquiry into the Foundations of the New Institutional Economics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis,J.J. and North, D. C. (1986) ‘Measuring the transaction sector in the American economy 1870-1970’, inS. L. Engerman andRE. Gallman (eds), Long Term Factors in American Economic Growth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, L. S. (1993) ‘Outward licensing by Australian companies’, in P. J. Buckley and P. N. Ghauri (eds), The Internationalisation of the Firm. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitelock, J. and Jobber, D. (1995) ‘Competitors and Information: Their Impact on Foreign Market Entry’, Conference Proceedings, Marketing Education Group annual conference, Bradford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1983) ‘Organization innovation: the transaction cost approach’, in J. Ronen (ed.), Entrepreneurship. Lexington MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1989) ‘Transaction cost economics’, in R Schmalensee and R. D. Willig (eds), Handbook of Industrial OrganU:tztion, vol. I. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1993) ‘Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization’, journal of Law and Economics, vol. xxxvi, 453-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. and Winter, S. (eds) (1991) The Nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolution and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Wynne-Edwards, V. C. (1962) Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behaviour. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Peter J. Buckley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Malcolm Chapman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 1998 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Buckley, P.J., Chapman, M. (1998). The Perception and Measurement of Transaction Costs. In: International Business. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26416-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation