Skip to main content

Professional Associations as ‘Brokers’, Facilitating Networking and the Diffusion of New Ideas: Advantages and Disadvantages

  • Chapter
The Diffusion and Consumption of Business Knowledge

Abstract

The process of innovation can be defined as ‘the development and implementation of new ideas by people who over time engage in transactions with others in an institutional context’ (Van de Ven, 1986). As long as the development and implementation of an idea is new to the particular organization then it is an innovation, even though it might exist elsewhere (Zaltman, Duncan and Holbeck, 1973). Innovation in organizations occurs when information is arranged in a novel way within that particular organization. As Macdonald (1995:557) states: ‘information is so fundamental to the learning required for deliberate change that it is not unreasonable to see change as an information process’. The information which is used in innovation may be available internally within the organization, and simply be reblended in some novel way. Where change is more radical, however, it is likely that new information needs to be acquired from beyond the organizational boundary. Organizations can, and do, enter into formal arrangements with other organizations (for example, via joint ventures), in order to obtain and control access to external information. However, as Hedberg (1981) notes, an organization is designed for information use rather than information acquisition. It is individual members of an organization, rather than organizations per se, who are key to the process of acquiring new information from beyond the organizational boundary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abrahamson, E. (1996). ‘Management Fashion’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, M. and Hage, J. (1971). ‘The Organic Organization and Innovation’, Sociology, Vol. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. and M.A. von Glinow (1992). ‘Personal Networks and Infrastructure Development’, in D.V. Gibon, G. Kozmetsky and R.W. Smilor (eds), The Technopolis Phenomenon: Smart Cities, Fast Systems, Global Networks (New York: Rowman & Littlefield).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alter, C. and J. Hage (1993). Organisations Working Together (Newbury Park, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijker, W.E., T.J. Pinch and T.P. Hughes (1987). The Social Construction of Technology (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohn, R. (1994). ‘Measuring and Managing Technological Knowledge’, Sloan Management Review, Autumn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, P.A. (1987). Anglo-American Innovation (New York: de Gruyter).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, P.A. and S. Newell (1993). ‘Societal Embedding of Production and Inventory Control Systems: American and Japanese Influences on Adaptive Implementation in Britain’, International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing, Vol. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, P.A. and N. Staunton (1989). Innovation in Technology and Organization (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, T.G. (1978). ‘Self-Regulating Work Groups: A Socio-Technical Synthesis’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R.L. (1978). ‘A Dual-Core Model of Organisational Innovation’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour, F., K.A. Szabat and M. Evan, (1989). ‘The Relationship between Types of Innovation and Organisational Performance’, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 26, No. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. and W.W. Powell (1983). ‘The iron cage revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’, American Sociological Review, Vol. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drazin, R. (1990). ‘Professionals and Innovation: Structural-Functional vs. Radical-Structural Perspectives’, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 27, No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, J. (1992). ‘GM Saga a Lesson for America’, Los Angeles Times, 27 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M.S. (1973). ‘The Strength of Weak Ties’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hage, J. (1984). ‘Organisational theory and the concept of productivity’, in A.P. Brief (ed.), Productivity Research in Behavioural and Social Sciences (New York: Praeger).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauschlidt, J. (1992). ‘External Acquisition of Knowledge for Innovations — A Research Agenda’, R & D Management, Vol. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedberg, B. (1981). ‘How Organizations Learn and Unlearn’, in P. Nystrom and W. Starbuck (eds), Handbook of Organizational Design (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Vol. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, H. (1993). ‘Network Centrality, Power, and Innovation Involvement: Determinants of Technical and Administrative Roles’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36, No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimberly, J.R. and M.J. Evanisko (1981). ‘Organizational Innovation: the Influence of Individual, Organizational, and Contextual Factors on Hospital Adoption of Technical and Administrative Innovations’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J. (1989). ‘Looking Overseas for New Members’, Association Managment, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, S. (1995). ‘Learning to Change: An Information Perspective on Learning in the Organization’, Organization Science, Vol. 6, No. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, S. and C. Williams (1993). ‘Beyond the Boundary: An Information Perspective on the Role of the Gatekeeper in the Organisation’, Journal of Production and Inventory Management, Vol. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel, H. (1960). ‘Innovation, Integration, and Marginality: A Survey of Physicians’, American Sociological Review, Vol. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. and B. Rowan (1977). ‘Institutionalised Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, S. and P. Clark (1990). ‘The Importance of Extra-Organisational Networks in the Diffusion and Appropriation of New Technologies: The Role of Professional Associations in the USA and UK’, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilisation, Vol. 12, No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, S., J. Swan and P. Clark (1993). ‘The Importance of User Design in the Appropriation of New Information Technologies: The Example of PICS’, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 13, No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, S. and J. Swan (1995). ‘Professional Associations as Important Mediators of the Innovation Process’, Science Communication, Vol. 16, No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, S., J. Swan and M. Robertson (1997). ‘Inter-Organisational Networks and the Diffusion of Information Technology’, in Information Systems and Technology Innovation and Diffusion, T. Larsen and G. McGuire (eds) (Harrisburg, USA: Idea Group Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations (New York: Free Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Raelin, J. and W.E. Carroll (1992). ‘Cross-Cultural Implications of Professional/ Management Conflict’, Journal of General Management Studies, Vol. 17, No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, M., J. Swan and S. Newell (1996). ‘The Role of Networks in the Diffusion of Technological Innovation’, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 33, No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1963). Diffusion of Innovations (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations, 3rd edn (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, J. and P.A. Clark (1992). ‘Organisational Decision-Making in the Appropriation of Technological Innovation: Cognitive and Political Dimensions’, European Work and Organisational Psychologist, Vol. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, J. and S. Newell (1995). ‘The Role of Professional Associations in Technology Diffusion’, Organization Studies, Vol. 61, No. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, J. and S. Newell (1994). ‘Managers’ Beliefs about Factors Affecting the Adoption of Technological Innovation: A Study Using Cognitive Maps’, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 9, No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. and T. Scanlan (1981). ‘Boundary Spanning Individuals: Their Role in Information Transfer and their Antecendants’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 24, No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A.H. (1986). ‘Central Problems in the Management of Innovation’, Management Science, Vol. 32, No. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, F., J. Desmond and H. Roberts (1994). ‘Success and Failure of MRP2 Implementation’, British Journal of Management, Vol. 5, No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaltman, G., R. Duncan and J. Holbeck (1973). Innovations and Organisations (New York: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1998 Sue Newell, Maxine Robertson, Jacky Swan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Newell, S., Robertson, M., Swan, J. (1998). Professional Associations as ‘Brokers’, Facilitating Networking and the Diffusion of New Ideas: Advantages and Disadvantages. In: Alvarez, J.L. (eds) The Diffusion and Consumption of Business Knowledge. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25899-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics