Skip to main content

The Transfer of Organizational Techniques Across Borders: Combining Neo-Institutional and Comparative Perspectives

  • Chapter
The Diffusion and Consumption of Business Knowledge

Abstract

The relative decline of the USA as an industrial power and the economic success of Japanese firms during the 1980s has renewed interest in the transfer of organizational forms and practices across nations (for instance, Lincoln, 1988; Mair, Florida and Kenney, 1988; Brown and Reich, 1989; Lincoln and Kalleberg, 1990; Florida and Kenney, 1991). Yet our understanding of transfers of organizational techniques across borders has made little progress due primarily to limitations inherent in the conceptual framework used. In this chapter we propose a neo-institutional framework modified by insights drawn from the comparative world-historical literature for the analysis of cross-national transfers of organizational techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adler, N.J. and J.L. Graham (1989). ‘Cross-Cultural Interactions: The International Comparison Fallacy?’, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, N.J. and M. Jelinek (1986). ‘Is “Organization Culture” Culture Bound?’, Human Resources Management, Vol. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agmon, Tamir and Mary Ann Von Glinow (eds) (1991). Technology Transfer in International Business (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, Goran (1982) Engineers and Industrial Growth (London: Croom Helm).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anheier, Helmut K. (1986). ‘Private Voluntary Organizations, Networks, and Development in Africa: A Comparative Study of Organizational Fields in Nigeria, Senegal and Togo’, unpublished PhD dissertation, New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Graduate School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arias, María Eugenia (1992). The Impact of Multinationals on Organizational Forms in Third World Nations: The Case of Human Resource Management Practices in Ecuadors Pharmaceutical Industry (New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Graduate School).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arias, María Eugenia (1993). ‘MNCs, Organizational Models and Local Firms in Developing Countries: The Case of the Pharmaceutical Industry in Ecuador’, Paper presented at the EGOS colloquium, Paris, France, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramanyam, V.N. (1973). The International Transfer of Technology to India (New York: Praeger).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, Christopher and Sumantra Ghoshal (1989). Managing across Borders: The Transnational Solution (Boston, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendix, Reinhard (1974). Work and Authority in Industry (Berkeley: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierstaker, T.J. (1978). Distortion or Development: Contending Perspectives on the Multinational Corporation (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, Luc (1990). ‘Visions of American Management in Postwar France’, in Sharon Zukin and Paul DiMaggio (eds), Structures of Capital (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyacigiller, N. and N. Adler (1991). ‘The Parochial Dinosaur: Organizational Science in a Global Context’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16, No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Clair and Michael Reich (1989). ‘When does Union Management Cooperation Work: A look at NUMMI and GM-Van Nuys’, California Management Review, Vol. 31, No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, Alfred D., Jr (1990). Scale and Scope (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Channon, Derek F. (1973). The Strategy and Structure of British Enterprise (Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Robert E. (1985). ‘The Macropolitics of Organizational Change: A Comparative Analysis of the Spread of Small-Group Activities’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 4 (December).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Robert E. (1989). Strategies for Learning: Small-Group Activities in American, Japanese, and Swedish Industry (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cusumano, Michael A. (1985). The Japanese Automobile Industry (Cambridge, MA: Council on East Asian Studies/Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Aunno, Thomas, Robert Sutton and Richard Price (1991). ‘Isomorphism and External Support in Conflicting Institutional Environments: A Study of Drug Abuse Treatment Units’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 34, No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Gerald F. and Suzanne K. Stout (1992). ‘Organization Theory and the Market for Corporate Control: A Dynamic Analysis of the Characteristics of Large Takeover Targets, 1980–1990’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul (1983). ‘State Expansion and Organizational Fields’, in Richard Hall and Robert Quinn (eds), Organizational Theory and Public Policy (Beverly Hills: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul (1986). ‘Structural Analysis of Organizational Fields: A Blockmodel Approach’, Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul (1988). ‘Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory’, in Lynne Zucker (ed.) Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger).

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul and Walter Powell (1983). ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’, American Sociological Review, Vol. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul and Walter Powell (1991). ‘Introduction’, in W. Powell and P. DiMaggio (eds), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Doktor, R., R.L. Tung and M.A. Von Glinow (1991). ‘Incorporating International Dimensions in Management Theory Building’, Academy of Management Review, 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dore, Ronald (1973). British Factory-Japanese Factory (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyas, Gareth P., and Heinz T. Thanheiser (1976). The Emerging European Enterprise (Boulder, CO: Westview Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Peter (1987). ‘Class, State and Dependence in East Asia: Lessons for Americanists’, in F.C. Deyo (ed.), The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Peter and J.D. Stephens (1988). ‘Development and the World Economy’, in N. Smelser (ed.), Handbook of Sociology (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, Neil (1985). ‘The Spread of the Multidivisional Form among Large Firms, 1919–1979’, American Sociological Review, Vol. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, Richard and Martin Kenney (1991). ‘Transplanted Organizations: The Transfer of Japanese Industrial Organization to the US’, American Sociological Review, Vol. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galaskiewicz, Joseph and Ronald Burt (1991). ‘Interorganization Contagion in Corporate Philanthropy’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galaskiewicz, Joseph and Stanley Wasserman (1989). ‘Mimetic Processes within an Interorganizational Field: An Empirical Test’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germidis, Dimitri (1977). Transfer of Technology by Multinational Corporations (Paris: OECD Development Centre Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, William A. (1971). ‘Cross-National Comparisons of the Factory’, Journal of Comparative Administration, Vol. 3, No. 1 (May).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillén, Mauro F. (1994). Models of Management: Work, Authority, and Organization in a Comparative Perspective (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, Gary G. and Nicole Woolsey Biggart (1988). ‘Market, Culture, and Authority: A Comparative Analysis of Management and Organization in the Far East’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickson, David J., C.R. Hinings, C.J. McMillan and J.P. Schmitter (1974). ‘The Culture-Free Context of Organization Structure’, Sociology, Vol. 8 (1), No.1 (January).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, John S. and Richard Still (1980). ‘Cultural Effects of Technology Transfer by Multinational Corporations in Lesser Developed Countries’, Columbia Journal of World Business, Summer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980a). Cultures Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values. (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980b.) ‘Motivation, Leadership, and Organization: Do American Theories Apply Abroad?’, Organization Dynamics, Summer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1987). ‘The Cultural Relativity of Organizational Practices and Theories’, in A. Dymza and J. Vamberly (eds), International Business Knowledge (New York: Praeger).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jepperson, Ronald and John W. Meyer (1991). ‘The Public Order and the Construction of Formal Organizations’, in W. Powell and P. DiMaggio (eds), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamens, David and Tormod K. Lunde (1988). ‘Institutionalizing Theory and the Expansion of Central State Organizations, 1960–80’, in L.C. Zucker (ed.), Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kedia, Ben and Rabi S. Bhagat (1988). ‘Cultural Constraints on Transfer of Technology across Nations: Implications for Research in International and Comparative Management’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 13, No. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, C, J. Dunlop, J. Harbison and C. Myers (1960). Industrialization and Industrial Man. (New York: Oxford, University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Linser (1991). ‘Pros and Cons of International Technology Transfer: A Developing Country View in Tamix Agnon and Mary Ann Von Elison (eds). Technology Transfer in International Business (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimberly, John R., Gérard de Pouvourville and Associates (1993). The Migration of Managerial Innovation: Diagnosis-Related Groups and Health Care Administration in Western Europe (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobrin, Stephen J. (1977). Foreign Direct Investment, Industrialization and Social Change (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobrin, Stephen J. (1991). ‘The Implications of Global Integration for the National Control of Technology’, in T. Agmon and M.A. Von Glinow (eds), Technology Transfer in International Business (New York: Oxford University Press.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, Bruce (1991). ‘Country Capabilities and the Permeability of Borders’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, Bnice (1993). ‘Learning, or the Importance of Being Inert: Country Imprinting and International Competition’, in Sumantra Ghoshal and D. Eleanor Westney (eds), Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation (New York: St Martin’s Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall, Sanjaya (1975). Foreign Private Investment and Multinational Corporations: An Annotated Bibliography (New York: Praeger).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall, Sanjaya, (1980). The Multinational Corporation: Nine Essays (London: Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lall, S. and P. Streeten (1977). Foreign Investments, Transnationals, and Developing Countries (Boulder, CO: Westview Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, J.R. (1988). ‘Japanese Organization and Organization Theory’, in B.M. Staw and L.L. Cummings (eds), Research in Organizational Behavior (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Vol. 12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, J.R. and A.L, Kalleberg (1990). Culture, Control, and Commitment: A Study of Work Organization and Work Attitudes in the United States and Japan (New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, Andrew, Richard Florida and Martin Kenney (1988.) ‘The New Geography of Automobile Production: Japanese Transplants in North America’, Economic Geography, Vol. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, Katherine (1986). Multinationals. Technology, and Industrialization: Implications and Impact in Third World Countries (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, Katherine (1987). ‘Technology Transfer to Developing Countries via Multinationals’, World Economy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R.H. (1980). ‘Japanese Type versus American Type of Technology Transfer’, Hitosubashi Journal of Economics, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurice, Marc, Amatsonge and Malcolm Warner (1980) ‘Societal Differences in Organizing Manufacturing Units’, Organization Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, Charles E. (1991). The German Experience of Professionalization (New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W. (1980). ‘The World Polity and the Authority of the Nation State’, in A.J. Bergesen (ed.), Studies of the Modern World System (New York: Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W. and Michael Hannan (1979). National Development and the World System (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W. and Brian Rowan (1977). ‘Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 83, No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W. and W. Richard Scott (1983). Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W., John Boli and George M. Thomas (1987). ‘Ontology and Rationalization in the Western Cultural Account’, in G. Thomas, J. Meyer, F. Ramirez and J. Boli (eds), Institutional Structure: Constituting State, Society, and the Individual (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W., W. Richard Scott and David Strang (1987). ‘Centralization, Fragmentation, and School District Complexity’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezias, Stephen J. (1990). ‘An Institutional Model of Organizational Practice: Financial Reporting at the Fortune 200’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nath, Raghu (1968). ‘A Methodological Review of Cross-Cultural Management Research’, International Social Science Information, Vol. 20, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negandhi, A. (1971). ‘American Management Abroad: A Comparative Study of Management Practices of American Subsidiaries and Local Firms in Developing Countries’, California Management Review, Vol. 14, No.1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negandhi, A (1974). ‘Cross Cultural Management Studies: Too Many Conclusions, Not Enough Conceptualizations’, Management International Review, Vol. 14, No.6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negandhi, A. (1983). ‘Cross-Cultural Management Research: Trend and Future Directions’, Journal of International Business Studies, Autumn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negandhi, Anant and Prasad, S.B. (1971). Comparative Management (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts).

    Google Scholar 

  • Orru, Marco, Nicole Woolsey Biggart and Gary G. Hamilton (1991). ‘Organizational Isomorphism in East Asia’, in Walter W. Powell and Paul J. DiMaggio (eds), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlmutter, Howard and Sagafi-nejad, Tagi (1981). International Technology Transfer: Guidelines. Codes and a Muffled Quadrilogue (New York: Pergamon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Walter (1988). Institutional Effects on Organizational Structure and Performance. In L.G. Zucker (ed.), Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and environment (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger).

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell Walter and DiMaggio, Paul (eds) (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, James B. (1969). ‘Technology Transfer by Multinational Companies’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, Charles. (1987). The Comparative Method (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, Charles and Daniel Chirot (1984). ‘The World System of Immanuel Wallerstein: Sociology and Politics as History’, In Theda Sckocpol (ed.), Vision and Method in Historical Sociology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, Mohan N. and Liming Zhao (1990). ‘International Technology Transfer: A Review’, Research Policy, Vol. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagafi-nejad, T. and Robert Belfield (1980). Transnational Corporations, Technology Transfer and Development: A Bibliographic Sourcebook (New York: Pergamon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagafi-nejad, T., R. Moxon and H. Perlmutter (1981). Controlling International Technology Transfers: Issues, Perspectives, and Policy Implications (New York: Pergamon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Richard W. (1983). ‘The Organization of Environments: Network, Cultural, and Historical Elements’, in John H. Meyer and W. Richard Scott, Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Richard W. (1987). ‘The Adolescence of Institutional Theory’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Richard W. (1991). ‘Unpacking Institutional Arguments’, in W. Powell and P. DiMaggio (eds), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Richard W. (1994). ‘Institutional Analysis: Variance and Process Theory Approaches’, in W. Richard Scott, John W. Meyer, and Associates, Institutional Environments and Organizations (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Richard W. and John Meyer (1983). ‘The Organization of Societal Sectors’, in John W. Meyer and W. Richard Scott, Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Richard W. and John Meyer (1991). ‘The Organization of Societal Sectors: Propositions and Early Evidence’, in W. Powell and P. DiMaggio (eds), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. Richard, John W. Meyer and Associates. (1994) Institutional Environments and Organizations (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, Theda (1984). Vision and Method in Historical Sociology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smelser, Neil J. (1976). Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stobaugh, Robert and Louis T. Wells (eds) (1984). Technology Crossing Borders: The Choice, Transfer, and Management of International Technology Flows (Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swidler, Ann. (1986). ‘Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies’, American Sociological Review, Vol. 51, No. 2 (April).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, George M., John Meyer, Francisco Ramirez and John Boli (1987). Institutional Structure: Constituting State, Society and the Individual (Newbury Park, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, Pamela S. (1985). ‘Institutional Environments and Resource Dependence: Sources of Administrative Structure in Institutions of Higher Education’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, Pamela S. (1987). ‘Institutional Sources of Organizational Culture in Major Law Firms’, in L.G. Zucker (ed.), Institutional Patterns and Organizations (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, Pamela S. and L. Zucker (1983). ‘Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reforms, 1880–1935’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTC (1983). Transnational Corporations in World Development: Third Survey (New York: United Nations Center on Transnational Corporations).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTC (1988). Transnational Corporations in World Development: Trends and Prospects (New York: United Nations Center on Transnational Corporations).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTC (1990). Transnational Corporations and the Transfer of New and Emerging Technologies to Developing Countries (New York: United Nations Center on Transnational Corporations).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R. (1972). The Economic and Political Consequences of Multinational Enterprise: An Anthology (Boston, MA: Division of Research, Harvard Business School).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R. (1979). ‘The Product Cycle Hypothesis in a New International Environment’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 41, No. 4 (November).

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Glinow, Mary Ann and Mary Teargarden, (1988). ‘The Transfer of Human Resource Management Technology in Sino-US Cooperative Ventures: Problems and Solutions’, Human Resource Management, Vol. 27, No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, Immanuel (1974, 1980, 1988). The Modern World-System 3 volumes. (New York: Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, John (1973). ‘Standardized Case Comparison’, in Michael Armer and Allen D. Grimshaw (eds), Comparative Social Research (New York: John Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Westney, Eleanor D. (1987). Imitation and Innovation: The Transfer of Western Organizational Patterns to Meiji Japan (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Westney, Eleanor D. (1993). ‘Institutionalization Theory and the Multinational Corporation’, in Sumantra Ghoshal and D. Eleanor Westney (eds), Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation (New York: St Martin’s Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, Richard D. (1992) Business Systems in East Asia (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack, James P., Daniel T. Jones and Daniel Roos (1991). The Machine that Changed the World: The Story of Lean Production (New York: Harper Perennial).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, Srilata (1995). ‘Overcoming the Liability of Foreignness’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, No. 2 (April).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zander, Udo (1991). Exploiting a Technological Edge: Voluntary and Involuntary Dissemination of Technology (Stockholm: Institute of International Business).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L.G. (1983). ‘Organizations as institutions’, in S.B. Bacharach (ed.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker L.G (1987). ‘Institutional Theories of Organizations’, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, Lynne G. (ed.), (1988) Institutional Patterns and Organizations (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1998 María Eugenia Arias and Mauro Guillén

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arias, M.E., Guillén, M. (1998). The Transfer of Organizational Techniques Across Borders: Combining Neo-Institutional and Comparative Perspectives. In: Alvarez, J.L. (eds) The Diffusion and Consumption of Business Knowledge. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25899-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics