Skip to main content

The Sociological Tradition and the Spread and Institutionalization of Knowledge for Action

  • Chapter
The Diffusion and Consumption of Business Knowledge

Abstract

The strong interest that business knowledge has prompted in the last years was noted at the beginning of the Introduction to this volume as well as the plurality of approaches adopted in trying to fathom it. I also commented on the particular institutional perspective adopted by this volume. In this chapter, I would like to elaborate on the two sociological traditions that have paved the way for the widespread focus on business knowledge, its epistemology, and on the social processes involved in its production, transmission and utilization: on the one hand, the Neo-Institutional School, which has brought knowledge into the centre stage of Organizational Theory, and on the other, the Sociology of Knowledge, which has left behind the more ideologized discussions of decades ago, and focused on the institutional conditions for the social acceptance of ideas. These two domains make the diffusion and consumption of business knowledge a theoretically framed topic, while providing a basic set of variables — proposed and refined by scholars over time — for examining it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abrahamson, Eric (1996). ‘Management Fashion’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, Howard and Peter Marsden (1988). ‘Environments and Organizations’, in Smelser, Neil (ed.) Handbook of Sociology (Newbury Park, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, José L. (1991). ‘The Diffusion and Institutionalization of the New Entrepreneurship Movement: A Study in the Sociology of Business Knowledge’. Harvard University, unpublished doctoral dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, José L. and Carmen Merchán (1992). ‘Narrative Fiction as a Way of Knowledge and its Application to the Development of Imagination for Action’. International Studies of Management and Organization, Vol. 22, No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, Mats (1987). Organization Theory and Technocratic Consciousness: Rationality, Ideology and Quality of Work (New York: Walter de Gruyter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, Chris and Donald Shon (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Astley, Graham (1985). ‘Administrative Science as Socially Constructed Truth’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astley, Graham and Andrew Van De Ven (1983). ‘Central Perspectives and Debates in Organizational Theory’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badaracco, Joseph (1991). The Knowledge Link: How Firms Compete Through Strategic Alliances (Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barley, Stephen, Gordon Meyer and Debra Gash (1988). ‘Cultures of Culture: Academics, Practitioners and the Pragmatics of Normative Control’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barley, Stephen and Gideon Kunda (1992). ‘Design and Devotion: Surges of Rational and Normative Ideologies of Control in Managerial Discourse’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 37, No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, Chester (1938). The Functions of the Executive (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, James, Frank Dobbin and P. Deveraux Jennings (1986). ‘War and Peace: The Evolution of Modern Personnel Administration in U.S. Industry’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 92, No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, James, Frank Dobbin and P. Deveraux Jennings, (1988a). ‘Mission Control? The Development of Personnel Systems in U.S. Industry’, American Sociological Review, Vol. 52, No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, James, Frank Dobbin and P. Deveraux Jennings (1988b). ‘Rome Wasn’t Built in a Day: Reply to Denk’. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 93, No. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartell, Ted (1976). ‘The Human Relations Ideology: An Analysis of the Social Origins of a Belief System’, Human Relations, Vol. 29, No. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Howard (1982). Art Worlds (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Daniel (1973). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Daniel (1988). ‘New Afterword’ to The End of Ideology: On the Exhaustion of the Political Ideas in the Fifties (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-David, Joseph (1960). ‘Roles and Innovation in Medicine’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 65 (May).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendix, Reinhard (1956). Work and Authority in Industry: Ideologies of Management in the Course of Industrialization (New York: John Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benveniste, Guy (1977). The Politics of Expertise (San Francisco, CA: Boyd and Fraser).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Peter and Thomas Luckman (1967). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (New York: Doubleday).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Peter, Brigitte Berger and Hansfried Kellner (1974). The Homeless Mind: Modernization and Consciousness (New York: Vintage Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, Janice (1981). ‘Ideologies, values, and decision making in organizations’, in Paul Nystrom and William Starbuck, Handbook of Organizational Design (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, Janice, Roger Dunbar and Alan Meyer (1988). ‘Comment: The Concept of Ideology in Organizational Analysis’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 13, No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter and Marshall Meyer (1987). Bureaucracy in Modern Society (New York: Random House).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, Luc (1981). ‘America, AmeriCA … Le Plan Marshall et l’Importation du ‘Management’, Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, No. 38 (May).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottomore, Tom (1956). ‘Some Reflections on the Sociology of Knowledge’, British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudon, Raymond (1980). ‘The Freudian-Marxian-Structuralist (FMS) Movement in France: Variations on a Theme by Sherry Turkle’, The Tocqueville Review, Vol. 2, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudon, Raymond (1984). La Place du Désordre: Critique des Théories du Changement Social (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudon, Raymond (1986). LIdéologie ou lOrigine des Idées Reçues (Paris: Fayard).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1977). Outline of a Theory of a Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourricaud, François (1980). Le Bricolage Idéologique: Essai sur les Intellectuels et les Passions Démocratiques (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, Linda and Kenneth Allan (1996). ‘Institutional Environments: The Corporate Merger Wave of the 1980s’, American Sociological Review, Vol. 61, No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsson, Nils (1989). The Organization of Hypocracy: Talk, Decisions, and Actions in Organizations (New York: John Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, Ronald (1980). ‘Innovation as a Structural Interest: Rethinking the Impact of Network Position on Innovation Adoption’, Social Networks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, Ronald (1982) Towards a Structural Theory of Action: Network Models of Social Structure, Perception and Action. (New York: Academic Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, Ronald (1987). ‘Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Glenn et al. (1988). ‘Organizations and the State: Effects of the Institutional Environment on Agricultural Cooperatives in Hungary’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Glenn and Michael Hannan (1989). ‘Density Dependency in the Evolution of Populations of Newspapers Organizations’; ‘On Using Institutional Theory in Studying Organizational Populations: Reply to Zucker’, American Sociological Review, Vol. 54 (August).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, Alfred (1969). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, Stewart (ed.) (1990). Organizational Theory and Class Analysis: New Approaches and New Issues (New York: Walter de Gruyter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Michael and James March (1986). Leadership and Ambiguity: The American College President (Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Colander, David and A.W. Coats (eds) (1989). The Spread of Economic Ideas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, James, Elihu Katz and Horbert Menzel (1966). Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study (Indianapolis, IA: Bobbs-Merrill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, Lewis (1968). ‘Sociology of Knowledge’, in D. Sills (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Covaleski, Mark and Mark Dirsmith (1988). ‘An Institutional Perspective on the Rise, Social Transformation and Fall of a University Budget Category’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, Diana (1972). Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, Michael (1964). The Bureaucratic Phenomenon (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, Michael (1984). The Trouble with America: Why the System is Breaking Down (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, Michael and Erhard Friedberg (1980). Actors and Systems: The Politics of Collective Action (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, James and John Petras (1970). The Sociology of Knowledge: A Reader (New York: Praeger).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, Richard and James March (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, Melville (1959). Men Who Manage: Fusions of Feeling and Theory in Administration (New York: John Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Gerald, Kristina Diekmann and Catherine Tinsley, (1994). ‘The Decline and Fall of the Conglomerate Firm in the 1980s: the De-Institutionalization of an Organizational Form’, American Sociological Review, Vol. 54, No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, David (1996). ‘Does Isomorphism Legitimate?’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denk, Charles (1988). ‘Many Roads Lead to Rome: Implications of Heterogeneous Diffusion for Institutionalization and “Internal Imperatives” ’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 93, No 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vault, Marjorie (1990). ‘Novel Readings: The Social Organization of Interpretation’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 95, No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul (1988). ‘Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory’, in L.G. Zucker (ed.), Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environments (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger).

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul and Walter Powell (1983). ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’, American Sociological Review, Vol. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbin, Frank, Lauren Edelman, John Meyer, Richard Scott and Ann Swikler (1988). ‘The Expansion of Due Process in Organizations’, in L.G. Zucker (ed.), Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environments (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsback, Kimberly and Robert Sutton (1992). ‘Acquiring Organizational Legitimacy through Illegitimate Actions: A Marriage of Institutional and Impression Management Theories’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F.E. and E.L. Trist (1965). ‘The Causal Texture of Organizational Environment’, Human Relations, Vol. 18 (February).

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, Amitai (1981). ‘Compliance Theory’, in O. Grusky and G. Miller (eds), The Sociology of Organizations: Basic Studies (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore, Marta (1993). ‘International Organizations as Teachers of Norms: The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organizations and Science Policy’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, Neil (1985). ‘The Spread of the Multidivisional Form among Large Firms, 1919–1979’, American Sociological Review, Vol. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulbrook, Mary (1983). Piety and Politics: Religion and the Rise of Absolutism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galaskiewicz, Joseph (1985). ‘Professional Networks and the Institutionalization of a Single Mind Set’. American Sociological Review, Vol. 50 (October).

    Google Scholar 

  • Galaskiewicz, Joseph and Stanley Wasserman (1989). ‘Mimetic and Normative Processes within an Interorganizational Field: An Empirical Test’. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, John K. (1971). ‘How Keynes Came to America’, in Economics, Peace and Laughter (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, Andrew, Mancur Olson, Norman Barry, Arthur Seldon, Max Hartwell and Andrew Melnyk (1989). Ideas, Interests and Consequences (London: Institute of Economic Affairs).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz Clifford (1968). Islam Observed. Religious Development in Morocco and Indonesia (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz Clifford (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz Clifford (1983). Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, Nathan (1988). The Limits of Social Policy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, Alvin (1954). Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy: A Case Study of Modern Factory Administration (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, Alvin (1955). ‘Metaphysical Pathos and the Theory of Bureaucracy’, American Political Science Review, Vol. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, Mark (1973). ‘The Strength of Weak Ties’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, Mark (1985). ‘Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfeld, Liah (1989a). Different Worlds: A Sociological Study of Taste, Choice and Success in Art (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfeld, Liah (1989b). Review of Hugill and Dickson (1988) in Contemporary Sociology, Vol. 18, No. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griswold, Wendy (1987a). ‘A Methodological Framework for the Sociology of Culture’, Sociological Methodology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griswold, Wendy (1987b). ‘The Fabrication of Meaning: Literary Interpretation in the United States, Great Britain and the West Indies’, American Sociological Review, Vol. 92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griswold, Wendy (1993). ‘Recent Moves in the Sociology of Literature’, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillén, Mauro (1994). Models of Management: Work, Authority, and Organization in Comparative Perspective (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurvitch, George (1971). The Social Frameworks of Knowledge (New York: Harper & Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, Richard (1985). ‘Doing Research That Makes a Difference’, in E.E. Lawler et al., Doing Research that is Useful for Theory and Practice (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Richard (1989). Review of Zucker (1988), in Contemporary Sociology, Vol. 18, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, Gary and Nicole Biggart (1985) ‘Why People Obey: Theoretical Observations on Power and Obedience in Complex Organisations’. Sociological Perspectives, Vol. 28, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, Gary and Nicole Biggart (1988). ‘Market, Culture and Authority: A Comparative Analysis of Management and Organisations in the Far East’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 94, Supplement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnschild, Pamela (1993). ‘Interorganizational Imitation: The Impact of Interlocks on Corporate Acquisition Activity’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, Heather (1993). ‘Follow the Leader: Mimetic Isomorphism and Entry into New Markets’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, Peter (1995). ‘The Dynamics of Institutionalization: Transformation Processes in Norwegian Fisheries’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 40, No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huczynski, Andrzej (1993). Management Gurus: What Makes Them and How to Become One (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugill, Peter and Bruce Dickson (1988). The Transfer and Transformation of Ideas and Material Culture (College Station, Tex.: Texas A & M University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Isenberg, Daniel (1984). ‘How Senior Managers Think’, Harvard Business Review, November-December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iser, Wolfang (1978). The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response (Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, Sanford (1985). Employing Bureaucracy. Managers, Unions, and the Transformation of Work in American Industry, 1900–1945 (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, Frederic (1981). The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jauss, Hans R. (1982). Toward an Aesthetic of Reception Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Jeffey (1986). ‘Social Networks and Innovation Adoption: A Look at Burt’s Use of Structural Equivalence’, Social Networks, Vol. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, Rosabeth (1983). The Change Masters: Innovation and Entrepreneurship in the American Corporation (New York: Simon & Schuster).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, Rosabeth (1989). ‘The New Managerial Work’, Harvard Business Review, November–December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Daniel and Robert Kahn (1966). The Social Psychology of Organizations (New York: John Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kedia, Ben and Rabi Bhagat (1988). ‘Cultural Constraints on Transfer of Technology Across Nations: Implications for Research in International and Comparative Management’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieser, Alfred (1989). ‘Organizational, Institutional, and Societal Evolution: Medieval Crafts Guilds and the Genesis of Formal Organizations’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, David (1982), ‘The Spread of Municipal Reform: Temporal, Spatial and Social Dynamics’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuklick, Henrika (1983). ‘The Sociology of Knowledge: Retrospect and Prospect’, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammers, Cornelius (1978). ‘The Comparative Sociology of Organizations’, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, Michele (1987). ‘How to Become a Dominant French Philosopher: The Case of Jacques Derrida’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 93, No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, Paul (1987). ‘Historical Development of Organizational Theory’, in Jay Lorsch, (ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, Paul and Jay Lorsch (1967). Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, Dorothy (1990). ‘Implementing New Production Technologies: Exercises in Corporate Learning’, in Mary Ann, Von Glinow and Susan Mohrman (eds), Managing Complexity in High Technology Organizations (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, Dorothy (1995). Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation (Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, Daniel (1958). The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, Barbara and Clifford Nass (1989). ‘The Lid on Garbage Can: Institutional Constraints on Decision-Making in the Technical Core of College-Texts Publishers’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymour Martin, Martin Trow and James Coleman (1956). Union Democracy: The Inside Politics of the International Typographical Union (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, Robert (1996). The Collapse of the American Management Mystique (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, George and Erza Vogel (eds) (1987). Ideology and National Competitiveness: An Analysis of Nine Countries (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, Laurence (ed.) (1978). Knowledge and Policy: The Uncertain Connection (Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences).

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlup, Fritz (1980). Knowledge: Its Creation, Distribution and Economic Significance (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, Vijay and Peterson, Robert (1985). Models for Innovation Diffusion (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, Karl (1952). ‘Conservative Thought’, in Essays in Sociology and Social Psychology (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, Karl (1959). ‘Competition as a Cultural Phenomenon’, in Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, Karl (1985; first published in 1936). Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich).

    Google Scholar 

  • March, James and Johan Olsen (1984). ‘The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life’, American Political Science Review, Vol. 78.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, James and Johan Olsen (1990). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • March, James and Herbert Simon (1958). Organizations (New York: John Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, Elton (1933). The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization (New York: Viking Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkle, Judith (1980). Management and Ideology: The Legacy of the International Scientific Management Movement (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert (1957). Social Theory and Social Structure (Glencoe, IL: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Messinger, Sheldon (1955). ‘Organizational Transformation: A Case Study of a Declining Social Movement’, American Sociological Review, Vol. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John and Brian Rowan (1977). ‘Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John, Richard Scott and David Strang (1987). ‘Centralization, Fragmentation and School District Complexity’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John, Richard Scott, David Strang and Andrew Creighton (1988). ‘Bureaucratization without Centralization: Changes in the Organizational System of U.S. Public Education, 1940–80’, in L.G. Zucker (ed.), Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environments (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michels, Robert (1915, trans. 1949). Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Micklethwait, John and Adrian Wooldridge (1996). The Witch Doctors: Making Sense of Management Gurus (New York: Times Business).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, Lawrence (1982). Explaining Organizational Behavior: The Limits and Possibilities of Theory and Research (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Stuart (ed.) (1979). Policy Studies and the Social Sciences (Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohria, Nitin and James Berkley (1994). ‘Whatever Happened to the Take Charge Manager?’, Harvard Business Review, January–February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, Donald et al. (1993). ‘Late Adoption of the Multidimensional Form by Large US Corporations: Institutional, Political and Economic Accounts’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott (1956). ‘Suggestions for a Sociological Approach to the Theory of Organizations I & II’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 1, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, Charles (1986). Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay (New York: Random House).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, Thomas and Robert Waterman (1982). In Search of Excellence (New York: Harper and Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, Jeffrey (1982). Organizations and Organizational Theory (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, Jeffrey (1993). ‘Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, Andrew (1993). ‘The Mangle of Practice: Agency and Emegence in the Sociology of Science’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 99, No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Lyman and Lawrence Mckibbin (1988). Management Education and Development: Drift or Thrust into the 21st Century (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Walter (1988). ‘Institutional Effects on Organizational Structure and Performance’, in L.G. Zucker (ed.), Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environments (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, Michael (1985). Redirections in Organizational Analysis (London: Tavistock).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, Paul (1986b). Lectures on Ideology and Utopia (edited by George Taylor) (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, Daniel (1978). The Work Ethic of Industrial America (1850–1920) (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roethlisberger, Fritz and William Dickson (1939). Management and the Worker (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Everett (1979). ‘Network Analysis of the Diffusion of Innovations’, in Paul Holland and Samuel Leinhardt (eds), Perspectives on Social Network Research (New York: Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Everett (1983). Diffusion of Innovations (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roos, Johan and George Von Krogh (1996). The Epistemological Challenge: Managing Knowledge and Intellectual Capital’, European Management Journal, Vol. 14, No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Michael (1975). Industrial Behaviour: Theoretical Developments since Taylor (London: Allen Lane).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, Robert (1990). ‘What Good are Business Schools?’, Newsweek, 14 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, Edgard (1985). Organizational Culture and Leadership (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Susan (1993). ‘Conflicting Ideologies: Structural and Motivational Consequences’, Human Relations, Vol. 46, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, Donald (1971). Beyond the Stable State (New York: Norton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Richard (1987). Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Richard (1988). ‘The Adolescence of Institutional Theory’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Richard and Søren Christensen (eds), (1995). The Institutional Construction of Organizations: International and Longitudinal Studies (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seliger, Martin (1976). Ideology and Politics (London: George Allen & Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, Philip (1943). ‘An Approach to a Theory of Bureaucracy’, American Sociological Review, Vol. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, Philip (1948). ‘Foundations of the Theory of Organizations’, American Sociological Review, Vol. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, Philip (1949). TVA and the Grass Roots (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, Philip (1952). The Organizational Weapon (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, Philip (1957). Leadership in Administration (New York: Harper & Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, Philip (1996). ‘Institutionalism “Old” and “New”’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 41, No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, Steven (1995). ‘Here and Everywhere: Sociology of Scientific Knowledge’, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenhav, Yehouda (1995). ‘From Chaos to Systems: The Engineering Foundations of Organiational Theory, 1789–1932’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 40, No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shils, Edward (1982). ‘The Sociology of Knowledge’, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, Vol. 4, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, David (1970). The Theory of Organizations: A Sociological Framework (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert (1957). Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert and Michael Prietula (1989). ‘The Expert in Your Midst’, Harvard Business Review, January–February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, Theda (1980). ‘Political Response to Capitalist Crisis: Neo-Marxist Theories of the State and the Case of the New Deal’, Politics and Society, Vol. 10, No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, Theda and Dietrich Rueschemeyer (1996). States, Social Knowledge, and the Origins of Modern Social Policies (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spates, James (1983). ‘The Sociology of Values’, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, Howard and Susan Harmling (1989). ‘Entrepreneurial Management’s Need for a More “Chaotic” Theory’, Working Paper, Division of Research, Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, Arthur (1965). ‘Social Structure and Organizations’, in J. March, (ed.), Handbook of Organizations (Chicago: Rand McNally).

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang, David (1987). ‘The Administrative Transformation of American Education: School District Consolidation, 1938–1980’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sultan, Fareena, John Farley and Donald Lehmann (1990). ‘A Meta-Analysis of Applications of Diffusion Models’, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 27, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, Francis, Seymour Harris, Carl Kaysen and James Tobin (1956). The American Business Creed (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swidler, Ann (1986). ‘Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies’, American Sociological Review, Vol. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swidler, Ann and Jorge Arditi (1994). ‘The New Sociology of Knowledge’, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E.P. (1967). ‘Work-Discipline and Industrial Capitalism’, Past & Present, Vol. 38 (December).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, James (1967). Organizations in Action (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, John (1984). Studies in the Theory of Ideology (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Kenneth (1986). Beliefs and Ideology (London: Tavistock).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, Pamela (1985). ‘Resource Dependence and Institutional Environment: Sources of Administrative Structure in Institutions of Higher Education’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, Pamela and L.G. Zucker (1983). ‘Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Difussion of Civil Service Reform, 1880–1935’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, Sherry (1981). Psychoanalytic Politics: Freuds French Revolution (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max (1930). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (New York: Scribner’s).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max (1978, trans.). Economy and Society (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Richard and Lynn Miller (1987). ‘The Concept of Ideology in Organizational Analysis: The Sociology of Knowledge or the Social Psychology of Beliefs?’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 12, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Richard and Lynn Miller (1988). ‘Response: Ideas, Interests and the Social Sciences in Organizations’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 13, No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westney, Eleanor (1987). Imitation and Innovation: The Transfer of Western Organizational Patterns to Meiji Japan (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, Richard (1984). ‘The Scientific Status of Management Research as a Practically Oriented Science’, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 21, No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, Richard (1988). ‘The Management Sciences and Managerial Skills’, Organization Studies, Vol. 9, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, Richard (1989). ‘On the Nature of Managerial Tasks and Skills: Their Distinguishing Characteristics and Organization’, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 26, No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, Robert (1989). Communities of Discourse: Ideology and Social Structure in the Reformation, the Enlightenment, and European Socialism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, Robert and M. Witten (1988). ‘New Directions in the Study of Culture’, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, Robert James Davison Hunter, Albert Bergesen and Edith Kurzwei (1984). Cultural Analysis: The Work of Peter Berger, Mary Douglas, Michel Foucault and Jürgen Habermas (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaret, David (1985). The Heavenly Contract: Ideology and Organization in Pre-Revolutionary Puritanism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff, Shoshana (1988). In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L.G. (1977). ‘The Role of Institutionalization in Culture Persistance’, American Sociological Review, Vol. 42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L.G. (1983). ‘Organisations as Institutions’, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L.G. (1987). ‘Normal Change or Risky Business: Institutional Effects on the “Hazard” of Change in Hospital Organizations’, Journal of Management Studies, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L.G. (ed.) (1988). Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environments (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1998 José Luis Alvarez

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alvarez, J.L. (1998). The Sociological Tradition and the Spread and Institutionalization of Knowledge for Action. In: Alvarez, J.L. (eds) The Diffusion and Consumption of Business Knowledge. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25899-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics