Skip to main content

Abstract

But what is usually called knowledge is structurally similar to knowledge of a problem. Knowledge is an activity which would be better described as a process of knowing. Indeed, as the scientist goes on inquiring into yet uncomprehended experiences, so do those who accept his discoveries as established knowledge keep applying this to ever changing situations, developing it each time a step further. Research is an intensely dynamic inquiring, while knowledge is a more quiet research. Both are ever on the move, according to similar principles, towards a deeper understanding of what is already known. (Polanyi, 1969)1

This essay draws heavily on a chapter titled ‘Making the Knowledge System Work’ that appeared in Nohria and Eccles (1992).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aldrich, Howard E. (1972). ‘Technology and Organizational Structure: A Reexamination of the Findings of the Aston Group’, Administrative Science Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., R. Putnam and D. McLain Smith (1985). Action Science: Concepts, Methods and Skills for Research and Intervention (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Astley, W.G. and R.F. Zammuto (1992). ‘Organization Science, Managers and Language Games’, Organisation Science, Vol. 3, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacharach, S.B. (1989). ‘Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badaracco, J. Jr (1991). The Knowledge Link: How Firms Compete through Strategic Alliances (Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (1973). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, J.M. and H.M. Trice (1982). ‘The Utilization Process: A Conceptual Framework and Synthesis of Empirical Findings’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brokaw, L. (1991). ‘Books that Transform Companies’, INC, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, J.A. (1990). ‘Is Research in the Ivory Tower “Fuzzy, Irrelevant, Pretentious”?’, Business Week, 19 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calkins, R.D. (1946). ‘Objectives of Business Education’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 25 (autumn).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A.D. Jr (1962). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayman, M. (1987). ‘In Search of Excellence: The Investor’s Viewpoint’, Financial Analysts Journal, May–June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Admission to Graduate Management Education (1990). Leadership for a Changing World: The Future Role of Graduate Management Education (Los Angeles: Graduate Management Admission Council).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutschmann, A. (1991). ‘The Trouble with MBAs’, Fortune, 29 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Empire Glass Company (A)’ (1964) Case study 109–043 (Boston, MA: Harvard Business School).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. (1988). Against Method (New York: Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielden, J.S. and Jean D. Gibbons (1991). ‘Merit Myopia and Business School Faculty Publications’, Business Horizons, March–April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (New York: Vintage Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings (New York: Pantheon Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R.A. and J.E. Howell (1959). Higher Education for Business (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacocca, Lee (1984). Iacocca: An Autobiography (New York: Bantam).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowlton, C. (1989). ‘The Buying Binge in Business Books’, Fortune, 13 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mindlin, S.E. and H. Aldrich (1975). ‘Interorganizational Dependence: A Review of the Concept and a Reexamination of the Findings of the Aston Group’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 20 (September).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohria, N. and R.G. Eccles (1992). Beyond the Hype: Rediscovering the Essence of Management (Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt, B.M. and Miller, W.D. (1989). ‘Irrelevance, Intransigence, and Business Professors’, The Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascale, R.T. (1990). Managing on the Edge: How the Smartest Companies Use Conflict to Stay Ahead (New York: Simon & Schuster).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T.J. and R.H. Waterman, Jr (1982). In Search of Excellence (New York: Harper & Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, F.C. and Others (1959). The Education of American Businessmen: A Study of University-College Programs in Business Administration (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1969). ‘Knowing and Being’, in M. Grene (ed.), Knowing and Being: Essays by Michael Polanyi (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L.W. and L.E. McKibbin (1988). Management Education and Development: Drift or Thrust into the 21st Century? (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reece, J.S. and Cool, W.R. (1978). ‘Measuring Investment Center Performance’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 56. May–June.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAM Committee on Relations with Colleges and Universities (1948). Management Education: A Report on the Survey among Business and Educational Leaders (New York: Society for the Advancement of Management).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, E.C. (1991). When Corporate Truths become Competitive Traps (New York: John Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P. and I.I. Mitroff (1984). ‘Enhancing Organizational Research Utilization: The Role of Decision Makers’ Assumptions’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K.W. and W.G. Tymon, Jr (1982). ‘Necessary Properties of Relevant Research: Lessons from Recent Criticisms of the Organizational Sciences’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vancil, R.F. (1978). Decentralization: Managerial Ambiguity by Design (Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1998 Nitin Nohria and Robert G. Eccles

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nohria, N., Eccles, R.G. (1998). Where does Management Knowledge come from?. In: Alvarez, J.L. (eds) The Diffusion and Consumption of Business Knowledge. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25899-4_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics