Skip to main content

Philostratus and the Imaginary Museum

  • Chapter
Vision and Textuality

Abstract

The Imagines of the Elder Philostratus must count as one of the great ruins of antiquity.1 From the Renaissance until the time of the excavations at Pompeii and Herculaneum, the Imagines, together with the surviving fragments preserved in Rome, constituted virtually all that could be known in Europe concerning classical painting. Even today, when so much more of that painting has been brought to light, the Imagines remains a unique resource. It is our most extensive account of what a Roman picture gallery, a Roman catalogue of pictures, and the Roman viewing of pictures may have been like. Philostratus claims to base his account in actuality. In the Proem he assures his reader that his 60-odd verbal descriptions are rendered after original paintings (pinakes) housed in a single collection in Neapolis (Naples).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For a history of the debate, see the following editions: Philostratorum Imagines et Callistrati Statuae, ed. F. Jacobs and F.T. Welcker (Leipzig, 1825);

    Google Scholar 

  2. Flavii Philostrati quae supersunt, ed. C.L. Kayser (1844);

    Google Scholar 

  3. Philostrati Maioris Imagines, ed. O. Benndorf and C. Schenkel (Leipzig, 1893).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Also: K.N. Nemitz, De Philostratorum imaginibus, dissertation (Bratislava, 1875), pp. 1ff.;

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. Bertrand, Philostrate (Paris, 1882), pp. 67ff.;

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. Steinmann, Neue Studien zu den Gemaldebeschreibungen des alteren Philostratus, dissertation (Zurich, Basle, 1914), pp. 1ff.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Karl Lehmann-Hartleben, ‘The Imagines of the Elder Philostratus’, Art Bulletin, XXIII (1941), pp. 16–44; henceforth referred to as ‘Lehmann’.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leonard Barkan, The Gods Made Flesh: Metamorphosis and the Pursuit of Paganism (New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press, 1986), p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. On ‘techniques of the self’, see M. Foucault, Le souci de soi (Paris: Gallimard, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Frances Yates, The Art of Memory (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1966), p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Barthes, from ‘The Death of the Author’, in Image-Music-Text, essays selected and translated by Stephen Heath (New York: Hill & Wang, 1977), pp. 145–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1995 Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bryson, N. (1995). Philostratus and the Imaginary Museum. In: Melville, S., Readings, B. (eds) Vision and Textuality. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24065-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics