Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Issues in Political Theory

  • 36 Accesses

Abstract

The arguments of this book have considered the historical and conceptual foundations of toleration in liberal political theory. At the outset, three central questions were isolated: ‘What is toleration?’ ‘What is the justification of toleration?’ and ‘What are the limits of toleration?’ A distinction was drawn between the defence of toleration offered by Locke in his Letter on Toleration and the defence offered by Mill in On Liberty. Locke’s narrower and more pragmatic account is often unfavourably compared with Mill’s doctrine and it is frequently urged that whilst Mill captures the spirit of the liberal approach to politics, Locke’s account is philosophically dead. The arguments of the preceding chapters should, however, give us cause to wonder whether this is a fair assessment.

‘If you prick us, do we not bleed?’ (Merchant of Venice)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 1989 Susan Mendus

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mendus, S. (1989). Choice, Community and Socialism. In: Toleration and the Limits of Liberalism. Issues in Political Theory. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20056-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics