Advertisement

Emulsions, Suspensions and Other Dispersions

  • A. T. Florence
  • D. Attwood
Chapter

Abstract

Emulsions and suspensions are disperse systems. While emulsions are sometimes formulated from oily drugs or nutrient oils, their main function is to provide vehicles for drug delivery in which the drug is dissolved in the oil or water phase. Suspensions, on the other hand, are usually prepared from water-insoluble drugs for delivery orally or by injection, usually intramuscular injection. An increasing number of modern delivery systems are suspensions of liposomes, or of polymer or protein microspheres or nanospheres, hence the need to understand the formulation and stabilisation of these systems. After a general introduction to colloidal systems (disperse systems below about 1 µm in diameter) this chapter will introduce the different types of emulsions, namely.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. T. Florence and D. Whitehill. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 79, 243 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. T. Florence and D. Whitehill. In Macro- and Micro-Emulsions (D. 0. Shah, ed.), ACS Symposium Series No. 272, American Chemical Society, Washington DC, 1983, pp. 359–380Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. M. Kovarick, L. Vevnillet et al. Ther. Drug. Manit. 16, 519 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. M. Kovarick, E. A. Mueller et al. Transplantation 58, 658 (1994)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. A. Mueller, J. M. Kovarick, J. B. van Bree et al. Pharm Res. 11, 301 (1994)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. P. Constantinides, G. Welzel et al. Pharm. Res. 13, 210 (1996)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. W. Barry. Rheol. Acta 10, 96 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. K. Konning. Can. J. Pharm. Sci. 9, 103 and 107 (1974)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. L. Whateley, G. Steele, J. Urwin and G. A. Smail. J. Clin Hosp. Pharm. 9, 113 (1984)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. Yamaguchi et al. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 42, 646 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. L. Henderson, P. M. Mee and H. B. Kostenbauder. J. Pharm. Sci. 50, 788 (1961)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. Anderson, J. E. Harthill, B. James and D. Montgomery. J. Pharm. Pharmacal. 30, 76P (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. A. Farley and W. Lund. Pharm. J. 216, 562 (1976)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. S. G. Curtis. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Bioi. 27, 317 (1973)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    K. C. Marshall et al. J. Gen. Microbial. 68, 337 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. J. Rezak. J. Pharm. Sci. 55, 538 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. E. Carless, J. B. Stenlake and W. D. Williams. J. Pharm. Pharmacal. 25, 849 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© A. T. Florence and D. Attwood 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. T. Florence
    • 1
  • D. Attwood
    • 2
  1. 1.The School of PharmacyUniversity of LondonUK
  2. 2.School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical SciencesUniversity of ManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations