Abstract
This paper examines the human mental lexicon and the associated word-recognition processes which together lie at the heart of our capacity to process spoken language as quickly and efficiently as we do. There is an emerging consensus that word recognition involves the activation of a set of lexical hypotheses and the selection of the target word from amongst this activated set. This view suggests itself quite naturally for speech given its continuous and sequential nature. More often than not listeners are in a position of having only partial sensory information about the target word — information that is insufficient to uniquely identify it. They are, nonetheless, continuously generating or activating lexical hypotheses on the basis of this partial information. Hence, it becomes an important research objective within this perspective to identify which words are activated during the recognition process — even if only temporarily or momentarily — and to determine how the appropriate word is ultimately selected and the inappropriate ones rejected.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Carlson, R., Elenius, K., Granstrøm, B. & Hunnicut, S. (1985). Phonetic and orthographic properties of the basic vocabulary of five European languages. Speech Transmission Laboratory — Quarterly Progress and Status Report 1, 63–94.
Cole, R. A., & Jakimik, J. (1980). A model of speech perception. In R.A. Cole (Ed.), Perception and production of fluent speech. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cutler, A. (1990). Exploiting prosodic probabilities in speech segmentation. In G. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cutler, A. & Norris, D. (1988). The role of the strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14,1 ,113–121.
Frauenfelder, U. & Henstra, J. (1988). Activation and deactivation of phonological representations. Proceedings of the 4th International Phonology Congress. Krems, Austria.
Frauenfelder, U. H. & Peeters, G. (1990). On lexical segmentation in TRACE: An exercise in simulation. In G. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Grosjean, F. & Gee, J. P. (1987). Prosodic structure in spoken word recognition. Cognition, 25, 1–2, 157–187.
Harrington, J. & Johnstone, A.M. (1987). The effects of equivalence classes on parsing phonemes into words in continuous speech recognition. Computer Speech and Language, 22, 273–288.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1984). Function and process in spoken word recognition. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and Performance X: Control of Language Processes. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 125–149.
McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1–86.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1991 The Wenner-Gren Center
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Frauenfelder, U.H. (1991). Lexical alignment and activation in spoken word recognition. In: Sundberg, J., Nord, L., Carlson, R. (eds) Music, Language, Speech and Brain. Wenner-Gren Center International Symposium Series. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12670-5_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12670-5_27
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-12672-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-12670-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)