Skip to main content

Actionable Process Theories: A Unique Selling Proposition for a Science of Services

  • Chapter
Service Science, Management and Engineering Education for the 21st Century

A key objective for a science of services should be to produce actionable process theories. Doing so will distinguish a science of services from competing fields like management information systems, and allow a science of services to have more immediate real-world impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Booch, G. (1994). Object Oriented Analysis and Design. Redwood City, CA: Benjamin Cummings Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Demarco, T. (1979). Structured Analysis and System Specification. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Yourdon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Elias, M. (2001). Study: Net use doesn’t increase depression, after all. USA Today, July 23, 2001. http:// www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2001-07-23-web-depression-study.htm.

  4. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The Way We Think. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Flor, N. (2000). Web Business Engineering. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Flor, N., & Maglio, P. (2004). Modeling Business Representational Activity Online: A Case Study of a Customer-Centered Business. Knowledge-Based Systems, 17, 39-56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fowler, M. (2003). UML Distilled. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., Crawford, A. (2002). Internet Paradox Revisited, Journal of Social Issues, 58, 49-74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53, 10171-031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mohr, L. (1982). Explaining Organizational Behavior. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mackenzie, K. D. (2000). Processes and their Frameworks. Management Science, 46, 110-125.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Simon, H. (1981). The Sciences of the Artificial (2nd Edition). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Flor, N.V. (2008). Actionable Process Theories: A Unique Selling Proposition for a Science of Services. In: Hefley, B., Murphy, W. (eds) Service Science, Management and Engineering Education for the 21st Century. Service Science: Research and Innovations in the Service Economy. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76578-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics