Skip to main content

Preanesthesia Evaluation and Testing

  • Chapter
Handbook of Ambulatory Anesthesia

Abstract

The explosive growth of ambulatory surgical programs has been one of the most formidable changes in the practice of medicine in the past 30 years. Few other events have affected so many patients in such a fundamental fashion. It has been estimated that approximately more than 80% of all surgical procedures performed in the United States are now being done on an ambulatory basis. Ambulatory surgery continues to diffuse to include a wider range of procedures, involving higher risk patients in more diverse environments increasingly removed from the traditional hospital setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Saklad M. Grading of patients for surgical procedures. Anesthesiology. 1941;2:281–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Apfelbaum JL. Preoperative evaluation, laboratory screening, and selection of adult surgical outpatients in the 1990s. Anesthesiol Rev. 1990;17:4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Meridy HW. Criteria for selection of ambulatory surgical patients and guidelines for anesthetic management: a retrospective study of 1553 cases. Anesth Analg. 1982;61: 921–926.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pasternak LR. Preoperative evaluation of the ambulatory surgery patient. Anesthesiology Report. 1990;3:8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dripps RD, Lamont A, Eckenhoff JE. The role of anesthesia in surgical mortality. JAMA. 1961;178:261–266.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Marx GF, Mateo CV, Orkin LR. Computer analysis of postanesthetic deaths. Anesthesiology. 1973;39:54–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carter DC, Campbell D. Evaluation of the risks of surgery. Br Med Bull. 1988;44:322–340.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Arens JF. Assessment and reduction of cardiovascular anesthetic risk. Anesth Analg. 1989:52–56.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fowkes SC, Fowkes FGR, Lunn JN, Robertson IB, Samuel P. Epidemiology in anaesthesia III: factors affecting mortality in hospitals. Br J Anaesth. 1982; 54:811–816.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grazer FM, de Jong RH. Fatal outcomes from liposuction: census survey of cosmetic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:436–446.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fleisher LA, Pasternak LR, Herbert R, Anderson GF. Inpatient hospital admission and death after outpatient surgery in elderly patients: importance of patient and system characteristics and location of care. Arch Surg. 2004;139:67–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preanesthesia Evaluation. Practice advisory for preanesthesia evaluation. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:485–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Eagle KA, Berger PB, Calkins H, et al. ACC/AHA Guideline Update for Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery—Executive Summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1996 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery). Anesth Analg. 2002;94:1052–1064.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Olsen DM, Kane RL, Proctor PH. A controlled study of multiphasic screening. N Engl J Med. 1976;294:925–930.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Korvin CC, Pearce RH, Stanley J. Admissions screening: clinical benefits. Ann Intern Med. 1975;83:197–203.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaplan EB, Sheiner LB, Boeckmann AJ, et al. The usefulness of preoperative laboratory screening. JAMA. 1985;253:3576–3581.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Turnbull JM, Buck C. The value of preoperative screening investigations in otherwise healthy individuals. Arch Intern Med. 1987;147:1101–1105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kitz DS, Susarz-Ladden C, Lecky JH. Hospital resources used for inpatient and ambulatory surgery. Anesthesiology. 1988;69:383–386.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fischer SP. Development and effectiveness of an anesthesia preoperative evaluation clinic in a teaching hospital. Anesthesiology. 1996;85:196–206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bryson GL, Wyand A, Bragg PR. Preoperative testing is inconsistent with published guidelines and rarely changes management. Can J Anaesth. 2006;53:236–241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yuan H, Chung F, Wong D, Edward R. Current preoperative testing practices in ambulatory surgery are widely disparate: a survey of CAS members. Can J Anaesth. 2005;52:675–679.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Olson RP, Stone A, Lubarsky D. The prevalence and significance of low preoperative hemoglobin in ASA 1 or 2 outpatient surgery candidates. Anesth Analg. 2005; 101:1337–1340.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fleisher LA. Routine laboratory testing in the elderly: is it indicated? Anesth Analg. 2001;93:249–250.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zilva JF. Is unselective urine biochemical urine testing cost effective? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985;291:323–325.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lawrence VA, Gafni A, Gross M. The unproven utility of the preoperative urinalysis economic evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42:1185–1192.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rucker L, Frye E, Staten MA. Usefulness of screening chest roentgenograms in preoperative patients. JAMA. 1983;250:3209–3211.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Charpak Y, Blery C, Chastang C, Szatan M, Fourgeaux B. Prospective assessment of a protocol for selective ordering of preoperative chest x-rays. Can J Anaesth. 1988;35:259–265.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hackman T, Steward DJ. What is the value of preoperative hemoglobin determinations in pediatric outpatients? Anesthesiology. 1989;71:A1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. O’Conner ME, Drasner K. Preoperative laboratory testing of children undergoing elective surgery. Anesth Analg. 1990;70:176–180.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bold AM. Use and abuse of clinical chemistry in surgery. Br Med J. 1965; 2:1051–1052.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zibrak JD, O’Donnell CR, Marton K. Indications for pulmonary function testing. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:763–771.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schein OD, Katz J, Bass EB, et al. The value of routine preoperative medical testing before cataract surgery. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:168–175.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Guyatt G, Cairns J, Churchill D, et al. Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1992;268:2420–2425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mallampati SR, Gatt SP, Gugino LD, et al. A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1985;32:429–434.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pasternak, L.R. (2008). Preanesthesia Evaluation and Testing. In: Twersky, R.S., Philip, B.K. (eds) Handbook of Ambulatory Anesthesia. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73329-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73329-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-73328-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-73329-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics