Abstract
This paper describes the design and architecture of a shell for building Intelligent Tutoring Environments in a wide range of domains. The proposed tool is based on the generic architecture INTZA, previously developed and tested, and is able to adapt and modify that generic architecture according to the requirements of the tutor. In this paper we mainly focus on the teaching-learning domain and propose a generic modelling environment which incorporates both content and pedagogical aspects. At Concrete Level the domain Basic Learning Units and their relationships are defined; at Pedagogical Level Requisite Relationships, Instructional Objectives and Support Information are defined.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Wenger, E. (1987) Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring System. Morgan Kaufmann.
Fernández-Castro, L, Diaz-Ilarraza, A. and Verdejo, F. (1993) Architectural and Planning Issues in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 4(4) pp. 357–395.
Gutierrez, J. (1994) INTZA: un Sistema Tutor Inteligente para Entrenamiento en Entornos Industriales. Phd Thesis, University of the Basque Country, Spain.
Scandura, J. M. (1983) Instructional Strategies Based on the Structural Learning Theory in Instructional-Design Theories and Models: An overview of their current status. (ed. Reigeluth, C. M.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 213-246.
Stevens, A., Collins, A. and Goldin, S. (1982) Misconception in students’ understanding in Intelligent Tutoring Systems (eds. Sleeman, D. and Brown, J.), Academic Press, pp. 13-24.
Merril, M. D. (1983) Component Display Theory in Instructional-Design Theories and Models: An overview of their current status (ed. Reigeluth, C. M.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 279-333.
Reigeluth, C. M., Merrill, M. D. and Bunderson, V. (1978) The Structure of Subject Matter Content and Its Instructinal Design Implications. Instructional Science, 7, pp. 107-126.
Goldstein, I. P. (1982) The Genetic Graph: A representation for the evolution of procedural knowledge, in Intelligent Tutoring Systems (eds Sleeman, D. and Brown, J. S.), Academic Press.
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Murst, E. J., Hill, W. H. and Drathwohl, D. R. (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Cognitive Domain. Longmans.
Gagné, R. M., Briggs, L. J. and Wager, W. W. (1974) Principles of Instructional Design. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Bretch, B. (1990) Determining the Focus of instruction. Phd Dissertation. University of Saskatchewan, Canada.
Woolf, B. (1992) Towards a Computational Model of Tutoring, in Adaptative Learning Environments: Foundations and Frontiers, (eds. Jones, M. and Winne, P.). Nato ASI Series.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arruarte, A., Fernández-Castro, I. (1995). A two-phased development shell for learning environments: a design proposal. In: Tinsley, J.D., van Weert, T.J. (eds) World Conference on Computers in Education VI. WCCE 1995. IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34844-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34844-5_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-1714-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-34844-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive