Advertisement

Social Axioms in Greece: Etic and Emic Dimensions and their Relationships with Locus of Control

Chapter
Part of the International and Cultural Psychology book series (ICUP)

Two studies investigated emic and etic aspects of social axioms and their correlates. In Study 1, an exploratory factor analysis with Greek university students revealed five factors resembling the original structure presented by Leung and Bond (2004). There were also indications for a sixth factor comprising of some Reward for Application items and some Social Cynicism items, reflecting stereotypic beliefs about justice and success and the “just world ” belief. Based on a Procrustean rotated solution, five salient factors were identified and they were also in line with the original structure. A “hit matrix ” (Georgas & Mylonas, 2006) containing all possible Tucker Φ comparisons among the factor solutions for six countries — including Greece — supported factor equivalence. However, discrepancies were present for specific factors or specific countries, implying a possible need for emic items. This was attempted in Study 2, with 558 Greek students and 20 additional items for examining a culturally Greek approach to social axioms. The five social axiom dimensions were verified afresh, but an additional culture-specific factor of Social Cynicism stressing competition in human relations emerged. These six social axiom factors were correlated with locus of control. Based on canonical correlation functions, Religiosity and Social Cynicism were correlated, as expected, with External Locus of Control, and Reward for Application was correlated with Internal Locus of Control. These correlations were further supported by discriminant function analyses, with an additional link between Fate Control and External Locus of Control.

Keywords

Coping Style Canonical Correlation Canonical Variate Internal Locus External Locus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Barnea, M. F., & Schwartz, S. (1998). Values and voting. Political Psychology, 19, 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bond, M. H., Leung, K., Au, A., Tong K., & Chemonges-Nielson, Z. (2004). Combining social axioms with values in predicting social behaviors. European Journal of Personality, 18, 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fakinos, M. (1979). Cultural mobility and internal–external locus of control. Master 's Abstracts, 17, 278.Google Scholar
  5. Feather, N. T., & O ' Brien, G. E. (1987). Looking for employment: An expectancy valence analysis of job-seeking behavior among young people. British Journal of Psychology, 78, 251–271.Google Scholar
  6. Fishbein M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  7. Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community simple. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 219–239.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gari, A., Mylonas, K., & Karagianni, D. (2005). Political and religious group membership, value priorities and educational values. Journal of Beliefs and Values, 26, 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gari, A., Mylonas, K. & Panagiotopoulou, P. (in press). Dimensions of social axioms and alternative country-clustering methods.In A. Gari & K. Mylonas (Eds.), Quod Erat Demonstrandum: From Herodotus ' Ethnographic Journeys to Cross-Cultural Research.Athens: Atrapos Editions.Google Scholar
  10. Gari, A., Panagiotopoulou, P., & Lyberopoulou, C. (2006, July). Social axioms and coping styles of Greek adults. Paper presented in the 18th International Congress for Cross-Cultural Psychology, 11–15 July, Spetses, Greece.Google Scholar
  11. Gari, A., Panagiotopoulou, P., Mylonas, K., & Pavlopoulos, V. (2004, August). Dimensions of social axioms: A cross-cultural perspective. Paper presented in the 17th International Congress for Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2–6 August, Xi ' an, China.Google Scholar
  12. Georgas, J., & Mylonas, K. (2006). Cultures are like all other cultures, like some other cultures, like no other culture. In U. Kim, K. S. Yang, & K. K. Hwang (Eds.), Scientific advances in indigenous psychologies: Philosophical, cultural and empirical contributions(pp. 197–221). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Karademas, V. X. (1998). The adaptation of a scale for the assessment of coping strategies in the Greek Language [I prosarmogi sta ellinika mias klimakas metrisis ton stratigikon antimetopisis aghogonon katastaseon]. Psychology, 5, 260–273.Google Scholar
  14. Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keung, D. K. Y., & Bond, M. H. (2002). Dimensions of political attitudes and their relations with beliefs and values in Hong Kong. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 3, 133–154.Google Scholar
  16. Kluckhohn, C. (1951). Values and value orientation in the theory of action. In T. Parsons, & E. A. Shields (Eds.), Toward a general theory of action (pp. 388–433). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  17. Leung, K., Au, Al, Huang Xu, Kurman J., Niit, T., & Niit, K.-K. (2007). Social axioms and values: A cross-cultural examination. European Journal of Personality, 21, 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (2004). Social axioms: A model of social beliefs in multi-cultural perspective. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 36, pp. 119–197). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic.Google Scholar
  19. Leung, K., Bond, M. H., De Carrasquel, S. R., Muñoz, C., Hernández, M., Murakami, F., Yamaguchi, S., Bierbauer, G., & Singelis, T. M. (2002). The search for universal dimensions of general beliefs about how the world functions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 3, 286–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leung, K., Bond, M. H., & Schwartz, S. H. (1995). How to explain cross-cultural differences: Values, valences, and expectancies? Asian Journal of Psychology, 1, 70–75.Google Scholar
  21. Morris, M. W., Williams, K. Y., Leung, K., Larrick, R., Mendoza, M. T., Bhatnagar, D., Li, J. F., Kondo, M., Luo, J. L., & Hu, J. C. (1998). Culture, conflict management style, and underlying values: Accounting for cross-national differences in styles of handling conflicts among US, Chinese, Indian and Filippino managers. Journal of International Business Studies, 29, 729–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. O ' Connor, D. B., & Shimizu, M. (2002). Sense of personal control, stress and coping style: A cross-cultural study. Stress and Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 18, 173–183.Google Scholar
  23. The Pan Books Dictionary of Philosophy (1979). Axiom, cynics, heraclitus. London: Pan Books.Google Scholar
  24. Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes and values: A theory of organization and change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  25. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  26. Rokeach, M. (1979). Understanding human values. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  27. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80, 1–28.Google Scholar
  28. Sagiv, L. (2002). Vocational interests and basic values. Journal of Career Assessment, 10, 233–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Safdar, S., Lewis, J. R., & Daneshpour, M. (2006). Social axioms in Iran and Canada: Intercultural contact, coping and adjustment. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Saroglou, V., Delpierre, V., & Dernelle, R. (2003). Values and religiosity: A meta-analysis of studies using Schwartz ' model. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 721–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). The universal content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  32. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon. (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 85–119). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. (2001). Value hierarchies across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 268–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schwartz, S. H., & Boehnke, K. (2004). Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 230–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schwartz, S., Sagiv, L., & Boehnke, K. (2000). Worries and values. Journal of Personality, 68, 309–346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Segall, M. H., Dasen, P. R., Berry, J. W., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1990). Human Behavior in Global Perspective. An introduction to Cross-Cultural Psychology. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  38. Sidiropoulou-Dimakakou, D., Mylonas, K., & Argyropoulou, K. (2008). Holland ' s Hexagonal Personality Model for a Sample of Greek University Students. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 8, 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Singelis, T. M., Hubbard, C., Her, P., & An, S. (2003). Convergent validation of the Social Axioms Survey. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 269–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L.S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th edition). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  41. Triandis, H. C. (1977). Interpersonal behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  42. Triandis, H. C., & Vassiliou, V. (1972). A comparative analysis of subjective culture. In H. C.Triandis (Ed.), The analysis of subjective culture (pp. 299–335). New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
  43. Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (2002). Structural equivalence in multilevel research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vassiliou, V., & Vassiliou, G. (1973). The implicative meaning of the Greek concept of philotimo. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 4, 326–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Veligekas, P., Mylonas, K., & Zervas, Y. (2007). Goal orientation and beliefs about the causes of success among Greek track and field athletes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 105, 927–938.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of AthensGreece

Personalised recommendations