Abstract
When readers first scan your text they will pay disproportionate attention to any organizers and summaries they encounter, but also to visually distinctive ‘attention points’ which stand out from the main text — especially tables, charts, diagrams, maps, photographs and text boxes. At this ‘eye-balling’ stage readers will often try to make sense of each attention point on its own, without reading closely the accompanying text, since they are trying to decide whether to focus down for serious study, and where. If data presentation is important to your thesis, or other elements play a key role in the exposition (for instance, diagrams in a theoretical argument or photographs in project work), then how you handle attention points will strongly influence readers’ views of the professionalism of your approach. Even if attention points are few and far between in your text, PhD examiners and subsequent readers (such as journal editors and reviewers) will expect them to be competently delivered. Later, too, you will go to conferences, and have only 15 or 20 minutes to give an oral presentation, or possibly secure only a poster session in a crowded conference venue. On these occasions people focus a lot of attention on your presentation slides or other exhibits. Usually these slides will either be versions of your existing attention points or designed on similar principles.
Standards of what counts as good presentation in reports are not static. They increase over time, reflecting changing information technology capabilities and practices in other large organizations. … Effective graphics and presentation of data require close attention to detail and zero tolerance of defects.
UK National Audit Office 1
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
National Audit Office, Presenting Data in Reports (London: National Audit Office, 1998), p. 1.
Quoted in L. D. Eigen and J. P. Siegel, Dictionary of Political Quotations (London: Robert Hale, 1994), p. 470.
National Audit Office, Presenting Data in Reports (London: NAO, 1999), p. 10.
See A. S. C. Ehrenberg, A Primer in Data Reduction (Chichester: Wiley, 1982), for a full set of examples).
My favourite sources are now dated but still useful works, such as Catherine Marsh, Exploring Data: An Introduction to Data Analysis for Social Scientists (Cambridge: Polity, 1988); Ehrenberg, A Primer in Data Reduction;
B. H. Erickson and T. A. Nozanchuk, Understanding Data: An Introduction to Exploratory and Confirmatory Data Analysis for Students in the Social Sciences (Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1979);
John W. Tukey, Exploratory Data Analysis (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1977);
Frederick Mosteller and John W. Tukey, Data Analysis and Regression: A Second Course in Statistics (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1977).
Umberto Eco, Kant and the Platypus: Essays on Language and Cognition (London: Verso, 1997), translated by Alastair McEwan, p. 83.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2003 Patrick Dunleavy
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dunleavy, P. (2003). Handling Attention Points: Data, Charts and Graphics. In: Authoring a PhD. Palgrave Study Skills. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-80208-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-80208-7_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-0584-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-80208-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)