Skip to main content

Envisioning the Thesis as a Whole

  • Chapter
Authoring a PhD

Part of the book series: Palgrave Study Skills ((MASTSK))

  • 470 Accesses

Abstract

What is your dissertation about? And what contribution do you aim to achieve? What will be new or different about your work? How would you justify the time and resources that you will devote to it? These fundamental questions will seem very pressing in the beginning stages of your research, as Yeats’ intangible process of locking you into a long-run project begins. But they do not go away later on. You can often push such issues into the background in the central stages of the thesis, during field visits, case studies or the hard slog of library or archive work or data collection and analysis. But they tend to return during the ‘mid-term slump’ in morale that often afflicts dissertation authors. And they invariably crop up again when you have a first draft of your complete thesis, and have to fashion it into a polished and defensible final version. This chapter is about the importance of thinking through some reasonable answers before you invest too heavily in a particular research topic and approach. I consider first how to define one or several questions that will inform your project as a whole. The second section looks at the demands of doing ‘original’ and interesting research.

In dreams begin responsibility.

W. B. Yeats 1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. W. B. Yeats included this line, attributed to ‘Old Play’, in the frontispiece of his poetry volume Responsibilities, first published in 1914. See W. B. Yeats, Collected Poems (London: Vintage, 1992), edited by Augustine Martine, p. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Quoted in A. A. Schuessler, A Logic of Expressive Choice (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000), p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Robert Nozick, The Nature of Rationality (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993), p. 164.

    Google Scholar 

  4. John Stuart Mill, On Liberty, Chapter 3, from John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism, Liberty and Representative Government (London: Dent, 1968), p. 123. Originally published 1859.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. D. Sertillanges, The Intellectual Life: Its Spirits, Conditions and Methods (Dublin: Mercier Press, 1978), translated by Mary Ryan, p. 145.

    Google Scholar 

  6. PhD regulations of London University, as printed in London School of Economics and Political Science, Calendar 2001–2001 (London: London School of Economics, 2000), p. 228.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Arthur Schopenhauer’s Paralipomena, quoted (vaguely) in E. Dimnet, The Art of Thinking (London: Cape, 1929), p. 163.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ivan Illich, Tools for Conviviality (London: Fontana, 1973), p. 101.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Johanne Goethe, ‘On Originality’ from Great Writings of Goethe, edited by Stephen Spender (New York: Meridian, 1958), p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Quoted in Patrick Hughes and George Brecht, Vicious Circles and Infinity: An Anthology of Paradoxes (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1978), p. 60.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Robert Oppenheimer, ‘A science of change’, reprinted in E. Blair Bolles (ed.), Galileo’s Commandment: An Anthology of Great Science Writing (London: Abacus, 2000), p. 298–9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Blaise Pascal, Pensées (London: Dent, 1932), p. 106, Thought number 395.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. K. Galbraith, The Affluent Society (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1958), pp. 18–20. Galbraith uses the phrase ‘conventional wisdom’ to describe ‘ideas which are esteemed at any time for their acceptability, and… predictability’.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Quoted in C. Rose and M. J. Nicoholl, Accelerated Learning for the 21st Century (London: Piatkus, 1997), p. 193.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Quoted in G. G. Neil Wright, Teach Yourself to Study (London: English Universities Press, 1945), p. 123, from Shaw’s play, Major Barbara, Act III.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Quoted in L. Minkin, Exits and Entrances: Political Research as a Creative Art (Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University Press, 1997), p. iv.

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. A. Miller, ‘The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information’, Psychological Review, (1956), vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Blaise Pascal, Pensées (London: Dent, 1932), p. 101, Thought number 370.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Quoted by Lewis Wolpert, The Unnatural Nature of Science (London: Faber, 1992), p. 81. This quote was a favourite of Alexander Fleming (1881–1955), the discoverer of penicillin. In the Hollywood film, Under Siege 2: Dark Territory a shortened version (‘fortune favours the prepared mind’) was also the motto of the arch-villain, a terrorist plotting to blow up the world by triggering earthquakes from space satellites.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Virginia Woolf, A Room of One’s Own (Frogmore, St Albans, Herts: Granada Publishing, 1983), p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Teilhard de Chardin, The Phenomenon of Man (London: HarperCollins, 1975), p. 323.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Albert Hirschman, in his paper ‘The Hiding Hand’, quoted in J. Elster, Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983), p. 158.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Quoted in Francis Wheen, Karl Marx (London: Fourth Estate, 1999), p. 311.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2003 Patrick Dunleavy

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dunleavy, P. (2003). Envisioning the Thesis as a Whole. In: Authoring a PhD. Palgrave Study Skills. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-80208-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics