Abstract
The concept of boundaries belongs to the development of the ego. Hartmann (1964) states that the development of the ego comes from the increasing conscious perception of the internal and external worlds. Similarly, Jung (1913, para. 757), in describing the concept of individuation, talks of the process of differentiation. It is this capacity to differentiate between perceptions that enables us to establish boundaries. The phenomenon of differentiation is dynamic which is why we refer to it as a ‘process’. However, as perceptions and boundaries become established, the ego slowly develops a sense of constancy, and the defensiveness of this identity is likely to depend on whether it can adapt to new perceptions, enabling existing boundaries to be challenged. In the first part of this chapter I shall look at some of the more obvious boundary problems in supervision. I shall then explore how, for those who have a good sense of their boundaries, it is both inevitable and creative to lose the sense of boundaries in order to bring about further differentiations and the establishment of less defensive boundaries.Wharton (1985) thinks that the development of the ego and the capacity to make boundaries is dependent on the child’s good enough relationship with its mother. Similarly, the relationship between analyst and patient and also between supervisor and supervisee can provide the containment necessary for the boundaries to be challenged by the psyche using what Jung (1916, para. 519) described as the process of unconscious identity.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Fordham, M. (1961) ‘Suggestions towards a Theory of Supervision’, Journal of Analytical Psychology, 6 (2).
Gee, H. (1996) ‘Developing Insight through Supervision: Relating, then Defining’.Journal of Analytical Psychology, 41(4).
Hartmann, H. (1964) Essays on Ego Psychology (London: Hogarth Press).
Jung, C. G. (1913) ‘Psychological Types’, Collected Works Volume 6, paras 757–62.
Jung, C. G. (1916) Collected Works Volume 8, para. 519.
Jung, C. G. (1921)Collected Works Volume 6, para. 762.
Jung, C. G. (1938) ‘Psychic Conflicts in a Child’, Collected Works Volume 17, Foreword to the third edition.
Klein, M. (1946) ‘Notes on Some Schizoid Mechanisms’, International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 27, 99–110.
Searles, H. (1965) ‘Problems of Psycho-Analytic Supervision’ and ‘The Informational Value of The Supervisor’s Emotional Experiences’, in Collected Papers on Schizophrenia and Related Subjects (New York: International Universities Press). Chapter 20 and Chapter 4
Wharton, B. (1985) ‘Show me Another Reality!:The Need for a Containing Ego’,Journal of Analytical Psychology, 30(3).
Wiener, J. (2001) ‘Confidentiality and Paradox: The Location of Ethical Space’, Journal of Analytical Psychology, 46(3), 431–43.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2003 Hugh Gee
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gee, H. (2003). Boundaries in Supervision. In: Wiener, J., Mizen, R., Duckham, J. (eds) Supervising and Being Supervised. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-62943-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-62943-1_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-96269-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62943-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)