Skip to main content

It’s all about catching the reader’s attention

  • Chapter
International Advertising and Communication

Abstract

The aim of our study is to show how readers pay attention to ads embedded in national newspapers. A total of 26,556 respondents were surveyed about their reading behavior, their recognition of ads published in the previous day’s newspaper, and their appreciation of these ads. Several measures were used to evaluate attention at the different levels of ad processing. The 290 advertisements included in the study were then content analyzed and related to the readers’ responses. Results showed that media position (i.e., prominent position in the newspaper), ad layout (bigger size) and ad content (more colors) had a stronger influence in the first attention phases (where pre-attention and focal attention are drawn) than in subsequent phases. On the other hand, reader characteristics (reading intensity, ad liking, and involvement) had a stronger influence in subsequent attention phases, where comprehension of the message and elaboration take place.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bauer, R.A. and S.A. Greyser (1968), “Advertising in America: the consumer view,” Harvard University, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beerli, A. and J.D.M. Santana (1999), “Design and validation of an instrument for measuring advertising effectiveness in the printed media,” in: Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, Vol. 21(2), 11–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogart, L., and B.S. Tolley (1988), “The search for information in newspaper advertising,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 28(2), 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronner, F., and D. Verzijden (1990), “Kwaliteit van bereik [Quality of reach],” Veldkamp, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, A.C. and E.R. Foxman (1989), “Some determinants of the use of advertising by married women,” in: Journal of Advertising Research. Vol. 29(5), 57–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cebuco (1985), “Dagbladen Binnen Bereik. [Newspapers within reach],” Cebuco, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celci, R.L. and J.C. Olson (1988), “The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 15, 210–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craik F.I.M. and R.S. Lockhart (1972), “Levels of processing. A framework for memory research,” in: Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, Vol. 11, 671–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duplessis, E. (1994), “Recognition versus recall,” in: Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 34(3), 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis, E. (2001), “Reclame en ons brein [Advertising and the mind of the consumer],” Samsom, Alphen aan den Rijn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, A. (1988), “Print ad recognition readership scores: an information processing perspective,” in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 25 (May), 168–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzen, G. (1994), “Advertising effectiveness: findings from empirical research.” Henly on Thames, UK: NTC Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzen, G. (1999), “Brands and advertising. How advertising effectiveness influences brand equity.” Henly on Thames, UK: Admap Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, L.D. (1983), “Not recall,” in: Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 23(1), 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodstein, R.C. (1993), “Category-based applications and extensions in advertising: Motivating more extensive ad processing,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 20(1), 87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A.G. and C. Leavitt (1984), “Audience involvement in advertising: four levels,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 11 (June), 581–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. and D. Maclay (1991), “Science and art: how does research practice match advertising theory. MRS conference papers (pp.51–68),” Market Research Society, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, F. (1995), “Recent developments in the measurement of advertising effectiveness: the third generation,” in: Marketing and Research Today, November, 259–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890), “The principles of psychology,” Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, H.E. (1977), “What makes advertising effective?,” in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 23(2), 96–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, H.E. (1986), “Low recall and high recognition of advertising,” in: Journal of Advertising Research,Vol. 26 (February/March).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A.M. van der and E.G. Smit (2001), “Advertising framed: An exploratory study on advertising frameworks in financial service advertising,” in: Document Design, Vol. 2(2), 156–171.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G. (1982), “Mind and emotion,” Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, H. & T. Illmann, T. (2000), “Werbung als Gestaltungsprozes [Advertising as Gestalt process],” in: Mayer, H; Illmann, T. (2000) (eds.), Markt-und Werbepsychologie [Market and advertising psychology], 3rd edition, Schäffer-Pörschel, Stuttgart, 426–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neijens, P.C. and E.G. Smit (2003), “De kracht van adverteren in dagbladen en dagbladmagazines [The power of advertising in newspapers and newspaper magazines],” SWOCC, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nördfalt, J. (2005), “Track to the future? A study of individual selection mechanisms preceding ad recognition and their consequences,” in: Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, Vol. 27(1), 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olney, T.J., Holbrook, M.B. and R. Batra (1991), “Consumer responses to advertising: the effects of ad content, emotions, and attitude towards ad on viewing time,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 17, 440–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsthoorn, A. (2003), “Aandacht te midden van overvloed [Attention amidst abundance],” SWOCC, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieters, F.G.M., & M. Wedel (2004), “Attention capture and transfer by elements of advertisements,” in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 68(2), 36–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, J.R. & L. Percy (1997), “Advertising and promotion management (2nd edition),” McGraw-Hill, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönbach, K. (2002), “Werbewirkung: Eine Inventur der Inventare [Advertising effectiveness: A meta-analysis of meta-analyses],” ICW, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sissors, J.Z. & L. Bumba (1992), “Advertising media planning (4th revised edition),” NTC Business Books, Lincolnwood, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steevels, R. & B. van den Putte (2004), “The ABCs of magazine advertising: practical guide for choosing advertising strategies,” in: Neijens, P.C.; Hess, C.; Putte, B van den; Smit, E.G. (2004) (eds.): Content and media factors in advertising, Spinhuis Publishers, Amsterdam, 75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit, E.G. (1999), “Mass Media Advertising: Information or Wallpaper?,” Spinhuis Publishers, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit, E.G. and P.C. Neijens (2000), “Segmentation based on affinity for advertising,” in: Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 40(4), 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speck, P.S. & M.T. Elliott (1997), “Predictors of advertising avoidance in print and broadcast media,” in: Journal of Advertising, Vol. 26(3), 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starch, D. (1966), “Measuring advertising readership and results,” McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Styles, E.A. (1997), “The psychology of attention,” Psychological Press, Bucks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, M. & A.K. Sylvester (2000), “Advertising and the mind of the consumer,” Allen & Unwin, Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • TMP (1996), “TMP katernenonderzoek [TMP sections reseach],” The Media Partnership, Diemen, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Putte, B. (2000), “De ene reclame is de andere niet: Onderzoek naar de houdbaarheid van een typologie van reclamewerkingsmodellen. [Not all ads are the same: A study on the existence of the advertising frameworks typology],” in: Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap, Vol. 28, 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Raaij, W.F. (1991), “Hoe gaat de consument om met reclame? [How does the consumer use advertising?],” in: Bladdossier, Vol. 1, 6–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedel, M. and F.G.M. Pieters (2000), “Eye fixations on advertisements and memory for brands: A model and findings,” in: Marketing Science, Vol. 19(4), 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Sandra Diehl Ralf Terlutter

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag ∣ GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smit, E., Neijens, P., Stuurman, M. (2006). It’s all about catching the reader’s attention. In: Diehl, S., Terlutter, R. (eds) International Advertising and Communication. DUV. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-8350-5702-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics