Abstract
In this paper we present a MOF compliant metamodel and UML profile for the Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) that integrates with our previous work on a metamodel and UML profile for OWL DL. Based on this metamodel and profile, UML tools can be used for visual modeling of rule-extended ontologies.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Angele, J., Boley, H., de Bruijn, J., Fensel, D., Hitzler, P., Kifer, M., Krummenacher, R., Lausen, H., Polleres, A., Studer, R.: Web Rule Language (WRL). World Wide Web Consortium, W3C Member Submission (September 2005), http://www.w3.org/Submission/WRL/
Brockmans, S., Haase, P.: A Metamodel and UML Profile for Rule-extended OWL DL Ontologies –A Complete Reference. Technical report, Universität Karlsruhe (March 2006), http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/WBS/sbr/publications/owl-metamodeling.pdf
Brockmans, S., Volz, R., Eberhart, A., Loeffler, P.: Modeling of OWL DL Ontologies using UML. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 198–213. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Chen, P.P.: The entity-relationship model – toward a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 1(1), 9–36 (1976)
Fowler, M.: UML Distilled, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2004)
Gaines, B.R.: An Interactive Visual Language for Term Subsumption Languages. In: Mylopoulos, J., Reiter, R. (eds.) Proc. of 12th Int. Joint Conf. on Art. Int., Sydney, Australia, August 1991, pp. 817–823. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1991)
Grosof, B., Kifer, M., Martin, D.L.: Rules in the Semantic Web Services Language (SWSL): An overview for standardization directions. In: Proceedings of the W3C Workshop on Rule Languages for Interoperability, Washington, DC, USA, April 27-28 (2005)
Hart, L., Emery, P., Colomb, B., Raymond, K., Taraporewalla, S., Chang, D., Ye, Y., Elisa Kendall, M.D.: OWL full and UML 2.0 compared (March 2004), http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~colomb/Papers/UML-OWLont04.03.01.pdf
Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Boley, H., Tabet, S., Grosof, B., Dean, M.: SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML. World Wide Web Consortium, W3C Member Submission (May 2004), http://www.w3.org/Submission/2004/SUBM-SWRL-20040521/
IBM, Sandpiper Software. Ontology Definition Metamodel, Fourth Revised Submission to OMG (November 2005)
ISO/IEC. Topic Maps: Information Technology – Document Description and Markup Languages. ISO/IEC 13250 (December 1999), http://www.y12.doe.gov/sgml/sc34/document/0129.pdf
Kremer, R.: Visual Languages for Knowledge Representation. In: Proc. of 11th Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management (KAW 1998), Voyager Inn, Banff, Alberta, Canada. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1998)
Motik, B., Sattler, U., Studer, R.: Query answering for OWL-DL with rules. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 549–563. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Object Management Group. Meta Object Facility (MOF) Specification. Technical report, Object Management Group (OMG) (April 2002), http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/02-04-03.pdf
Object Management Group. MOF 2.0 Query / Views / Transformations – Request for Proposal (2002), http://www.omg.org/docs/ad/02-04-10.pdf
Object Management Group. Ontology Definition Metamodel – Request For Proposal (March 2003), http://www.omg.org/docs/ontology/03-03-01.rtf
Patel-Schneider, P.F., Hayes, P., Horrocks, I.: OWL Web Ontology Language Semantics and Abstract Syntax. World Wide Web Consortium, Recommendation (February 10, 2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-semantics-20040210/
Schnotz, W.: Wissenserwerb mit Texten, Bildern und Diagrammen. In: Issing, L.J., Klimsa, P. (eds.) Information und Lernen mit Multimedia und Internet, Belz, PVU, Weinheim (third, completely revised edition) pp. 65–81 (2002)
Sowa, J.F.: Conceptual graphs summary. In: Eklund, P., Nagle, T., Nagle, J., Gerholz, L. (eds.) Conceptual Structures: Current Research and Practice, pp. 3–52. Ellis Horwood, New York (1992)
Accepted Papers of the W3C Workshop on Rule Languages for Interoperability, Washington, DC, USA, April 27-28 (2005), http://www.w3.org/2004/12/rules-ws/accepted
W3C. Rule interchange format working group charter (2005), http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/charter
Walker, A.: Understandability and semantic interoperability of diverse rules systems. In: Position Paper for the W3C Workshop on Rule Languages for Interoperability (April 2005), http://www.w3.org/2004/12/rules-ws/paper/19
Warmer, J., Kleppe, A.: Object Constraint Language 2.0. MITP Verlag (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Brockmans, S., Haase, P., Hitzler, P., Studer, R. (2006). A Metamodel and UML Profile for Rule-Extended OWL DL Ontologies. In: Sure, Y., Domingue, J. (eds) The Semantic Web: Research and Applications. ESWC 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4011. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11762256_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11762256_24
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-34544-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-34545-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)