Abstract
In this article, we investigate the problem of checking consistency in a hybrid formalism, which combines two essential formalisms in qualitative spatial reasoning: topological formalism and cardinal direction formalism. Instead of using conventional composition tables, we investigate the interactions between topological and cardinal directional relations with the aid of rules that are used efficiently in many research fields such as content-based image retrieval. These rules are shown to be sound, i.e. the deductions are logically correct. Based on these rules, an improved constraint propagation algorithm is introduced to enforce the path consistency.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Gerevini, A., Renz, J.: Combining Topological and Size Constraints for Spatial Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence (AIJ) 137(1-2), 1–42 (2002)
Isli, A., Haarslev, V., Moller, R.: Combining cardinal direction relations and relative orientation relations in Qualitative Spatial Reasoning. Fachbereich Informatik, University Hamburg, Technical report FBI-HH-M-304/01 (2001)
Sharma, J.: Integrated spatial reasoning in geographic information systems: combining topology and direction. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Spatial Information Science and Engineering, University of Maine, Orono, ME (1996)
Allen, J.F.: Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Communications of the ACM 26(11), 832–843 (1983)
Prasad Sistla, A., Yu, C.T., Haddad, R.: Reasoning About Spatial Relations in Picture Retrieval Systems. In: 20th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 570–581. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1994)
Egenhofer, M.: A Formal Definition of Binary Topological Relations. In: Litwin, W., Schek, H.-J. (eds.) FODO 1989. LNCS, vol. 367, pp. 457–472. Springer, Heidelberg (1989)
Randell, D., Cui, Z., Cohn, A.: A spatial logic based on regions and connection. In: Nebel, B., Rich, C., Swartout, W. (eds.) Proc. of the Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 165–176. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1992)
Goyal, R., Egenhofer, M.: Cardinal Directions between Extended Spatial Objects. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2000) (to be published)
Skiadopoulos, S., Koubarakis, M.: Composing cardinal direction relations. Artificial Intelligence 152(2), 143–171 (2004)
Randell, D.A., Cohn, A.G., Cui, Z.: Computing Transitivity Tables: A Challenge For Automated Theorem Provers. In: Kapur, D. (ed.) CADE 1992. LNCS, vol. 607, pp. 786–790. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)
Cicerone, S., Felice, P.D.: Cardinal directions between spatial objects: the pairwise-consistency problem. Information Sciences 164, 165–188 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Li, W., Sun, H. (2005). New Rules for Hybrid Spatial Reasoning. In: Gallagher, M., Hogan, J.P., Maire, F. (eds) Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning - IDEAL 2005. IDEAL 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3578. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11508069_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11508069_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-26972-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31693-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)