Skip to main content

A Taxonomy of Legal Accountabilities in the UK e-Voting Pilots

  • Conference paper
Electronic Government (EGOV 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2739))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, a process approach to the investigation of e-voting is adopted defining the process stages and the agents involved in each stage. The technologies used in the delivery of electronic voting, the locations related to the different stages of the process and the main legal issues involved have been identified in the existing literature. These five elements, namely agents, legal issues, process stages, technologies used and locations involved, form the framework of this taxonomy. The aim of the taxonomy is to provide an insight into the legal issues emerging according to the different combined relationships between these five elements, and provide a tool for the identification of legal accountabilities amongst the different agents involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Coleman, S., et al.: Independent Commission on Alternative Voting Methods. In: Elections on the 21st Century: from paper ballot to e-voting, Electoral Reform Society (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pratchett, L.: The implementation of electronic voting in the UK. LGA Publications, the Local Government Association (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. http://www.odpm.gov.uk/

  4. Electoral Commission Modernising Elections, A strategic evaluation of the 2002 electoral pilot schemes (August 2002), available on-line at http://www.electoralcommission.gov.uk/

  5. Fairweather, B., Rogerson, S.: Technical Options Report, De Montfort University, Leicester (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, The Electoral Commission and the Local Government Association Modernising Elections Prospectus for electoral pilots – local elections 2003, available at http://www.local-regions.odpm.gov.uk/elections/index.htm

  7. Disability Access Standards for the Electoral Modernisation Pilot Projects Access standards for e-voting and e-counting technology, SCOPE (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Watt, B.: Implementing Electronic Voting, A report addressing the legal issues by the implementation of electronic voting, University of Essex (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. The Electoral Commission, pilot scheme evaluation Stratford on Avon District Council May 2 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. The Electoral Commission, pilot scheme evaluation Bolton Metropolitan Borough May 2 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. The Electoral Commission, pilot scheme evaluation Swindon Borough Council May 2 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mercurri, R.: Rebecca Mercuri’s Statement on Electronic Voting, available on-line at http://www.notablesoftware.com/RMstatement.html

  13. http://www.vote.caltech.edu

  14. http://www.election.com

  15. E-voting security study, The Crown (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. OASIS Election and Voter Services Technical Committee, Election Mark-up Language (EML): e-voting process and data requirements

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ballinger, C., Coleman, S.: Electoral and the Internet, Some Issues Considered, Hansard Society (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Representation of the People Act 1983

    Google Scholar 

  19. The Electoral Commission, pilot scheme evaluation St Albans City and District Council May 2 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights, Guidelines for reviewing a legal framework for elections, Warsaw (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. The Electoral Commission, pilot scheme evaluation Liverpool City Council May 2 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. The Electoral Commission, pilot scheme evaluation Sheffield City Council May 2 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  23. NOP World, Public Opinion in the Pilots, A report summarising the aggregate findings from surveys carried out by NOP Research in May 2002 in 13 electoral pilot scheme areas (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Electoral Modernisation Pilots, Statement of requirements, ODPM (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  25. The Electoral Commission, pilot scheme evaluation Chorley Borough Council May 2 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Xenakis, A., Macintosh, A. (2003). A Taxonomy of Legal Accountabilities in the UK e-Voting Pilots. In: Traunmüller, R. (eds) Electronic Government. EGOV 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2739. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/10929179_71

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/10929179_71

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40845-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45239-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics