Six Actions to Initiate PPR

  • Kim Viborg Andersen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2739)


The main focus of the Public Sector Process Rebuilding (PPR) method is to orient information systems (IS) towards the end-user of the public services. This paper presents six actions implementing the PPR-concept: (1) bring order in the digital tool box; (2) argue which processes can not be 100% digitalized; (3) explain what the IS-benefits are for citizens, decision-making and prioritizing; (4) distribute new IS leaving 10% for intra departmental solution and 20% on other inter/intra governmental communication; (5) access the formal IT capability; and (6) identify the radical IS implementation.


Public Sector Information System Public Employee Virtual Organization Radical Challenge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Andersen, K.V., Danziger, J.N.: IT Transformation of the Political World. International Journal of Public Administration (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Argyris, C., Putnam, R., Smith, D.: Action Science. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1985)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baskerville, R.K.: Investigating Information Systems With Action Research. In: CAIS, vol. 2 (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Champy, J.: X-Engineering the Corporation. Hodder & Stroughton, London (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Danziger, J.N., et al.: Computers and Politics. Colombia University Press (1982)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dutton, W.H., Kraemer, K.L.: Modeling as Negotiating. Ablex, Greenwich (1985)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., Vähäaho, T.: When the Center Does Not Hold: The Importance of Knotworking. In: Chailkin, M.H., Juul Jensen, U. (eds.) Activity theory and social practice: Cultural-historical approaches, Aarhus University Press (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fitzgerald, B., Howcroft, D.: Towards Dissolution of the IS Research Debate: From Polarisation to Polarity. Special issue of JIT on research methods (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Galliers, R.D.: Business Re-Engineering: The Fad That Forgot People. In: The Dynamics of Strategy, Sems, University of Surrey, pp. 1–13 (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hammer, M., Champy, J.: Reengineering the Corporation. HarperCollins Publishers (1993)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hedberg, B., et al.: Virtual Organizations and Beyond. Wiley, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heeks, R.: Reinventing Government in the Information Age: International Practice in IT-enabled Public Sector Reform. Routledge, London (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Osborne, D., Gaebler, T.: Reinventing government. The Penguin Group, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Snellen, I.T.M., van de Donk, W.B.H.J.: Public Administration in an Information Age. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1998)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thaens, B., Van Duivenboden, H.: BPR in the public administration. In: Conference for the European Group of Public Administration (EGPA), Budapest, Hungary (1995)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Weick, K.E.: Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination. Academy of Management Review, 516–531 (1989)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Whetten, D.A.: What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution? Academy of Management Review, 490–495 (1989)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kim Viborg Andersen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of InformaticsCopenhagen Business SchoolFrederiksbergDenmark

Personalised recommendations