Advertisement

Framing e-Gov: e=mc3

  • Åke Grönlund
Conference paper
  • 1k Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2739)

Abstract

There is a need for discussing the role of IT use in government and governance beyond the information processing aspects, but theories are badly lacking. The literature on various aspects of government tends to underestimate the role of IT while IT studies tend to overestimate it. IT and information systems are not much studied in political science. While some thirty years of studies of information systems have produced many theories concerning IT use in organisations, e-government studies require going beyond the border of the organization as government/nance cannot be reduced to individual organizations, not even if interorganisational cooperation is included. This paper proposes a model that considers governance as a system rather than in terms of its individual organizational units and processes, and views information systems from that perspective.

Keywords

Civil Society Political Sphere User Influence Electronic Government Focus Unit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anttiroiko, A.-V.: Toward the European Information Society. Communications of the ACM (January 2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goldkuhl, G., Röstlinger, A.: IT som möjliggörare och hinder – i samspel mellan politik och verksamhet i kommuner (IT as enabler and obstacle). In: Åke Grönlund & Agenta Ranerup (red) Elektronisk förvaltning, elektronisk demokrati (Electronic government, electronic democracy), Studentlitteratur (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grönlund, Å.: Electronic government – Design, Applications, and Management. Idea Group Publishing, USA (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grönlund, Å.: Emerging Infrastructures for E-democracy – in Search of Strong Inscriptions. eService Journal 2(4) (2002b)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grönlund, Å., Ilshammar, L.: e=mc3. A theory of electronic governance information systems. Forthcoming in proceedings of IRIS 2003 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heeks, R.: eGovernment for Development. Causes of eGovernment Success and Failure: Factor Model (visited December 1) (2002), http://www.egov4dev.org/causefactor.htm#model
  7. 7.
    Molin, B., Månsson, L., Strömberg, L.: Offentlig förvaltning (Public Administration). Bonniers (1975)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Snellen, I.T.M.: Channeling Democratic Influences Through Bureaucracies. In: van de Donk, W.B.H.J., Snellen, I.T.M., Top, P.W. (eds.) Orwell in Athens – A Perspective on Informatization and Democracy, pp. 51–60. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1995)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zouridis, S., Thaens, M.: eGovernment: Towards a Public Administration Approach. In: Proceedeings of Global e-Policy eGov Forum, Seoul, Korea, pp. 119–133. SungKyunKwan University, Global e-Policy eGovernment Institute (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Watson, R., Akselsen, S., Evjemo, B., Aasaether, N.: Teledemocracy in Local Government. Communications of the ACM, 58–63 (December 1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wiberg, M.: e-Government in Sweden: Centralization, Self-Service and Competition. In: Grönlund, Å. (ed.) Electronic Government – Design, Applications and Management. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    World Bank, A Definition of E*Government (2002), http://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/egov/definition.htm (visited November 13, 2002)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Åke Grönlund
    • 1
  1. 1.Örebro UniversityÖrebroSweden

Personalised recommendations