Supporting Voting Decisions: Two Municipal Referendum Websites

  • Arthur Edwards
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2739)


Two Dutch municipal referendum websites were evaluated with regard to their potential for supporting voting decisions. The websites embodied different approaches to information provision. Both approaches showed disadvantages. In particular, the websites fell short on ‘argumentative empowerment’, in the one case by not providing any argumentative frames within which information could be evaluated, in the other by providing information solely within the argumentative frame of the municipality.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Budge, I.: The New Challenge of Direct Democracy. Polity Press, London (1996)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schudson, M.: The Good Citizen. A History of American Civic Life. The Free Press, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lupia, A., McCubbins, M.D.: The Democratic Dilemma. Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know?. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lupia, A.: Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias. Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections. American Political Science Review 88(10), 63–76 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schevits, J.A.: The Fourth Branch of Government. An analysis of the initiative and referendum process and how the Internet might improve it. Initiative and Referendum Institute (2000), (retrieved May 30, 2003)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arthur Edwards
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Public AdministrationErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations