Advertisement

Optimization Tools for Radiation Treatment Planning in Matlab

  • Michael C. Ferris
  • Jinho Lim
  • David M. Shepard
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 70)

Summary

This chapter describes a suite of optimization tools for radiation treatment planning within the Matlab programming environment. The data included with these tools was computed for real patient cases using a Monte Carlo dose engine. The formulation of a series of optimization models is described that utilizes this data within a modeling system. Furthermore, visualization techniques are provided that assist in validating the quality of each solution. The versatility and utility of the tools are shown using a sequence of optimization techniques designed to generate a practical solution. These tools and the associated data are available for download from www.cs.wisc.edu/~ferris/3dcrt.

Key words

Optimization Radiation treatment planning Matlab 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Bortfeld, T. and W. Schlege (1993). Optimization of beam orientations in radiation-therapy-some theoretical considerations. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 38, 291–304.CrossRefADSPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Bortfeld, T., J. Burkelbach, R. Boesecke, and W. Schlegel (1990). Methods of image reconstruction from projections applied to conformation radiotherapy. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 25, 1423–1434.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Bortfeld, T., A.L. Boyer, W. Schlegel, D.L. Kahler, and T.J. Waldron (1994). Realization and verification of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with modulated fields. International Journal of Radiation Oncology: Biology, Physics, 30, 899–908.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Chen, Y., D. Michalski, C. Houser, and J. Galvin (2002). A deterministic iterative least-squares algorithm for beam weight optimization in conformal radiotherapy. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 47, 1647–1658.ADSPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Collaborative Working Group (2001). Intensity-modulated radiotherapy: Current status and issues of interest. International Journal of Radiation Oncology: Biology, Physics, 51, 880–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Jordan, T.J. and P.C. Williams (1994). The design and performance characteristics of a multileaf collimator. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 39, 231–251.CrossRefADSPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Tervo, T. and P. Kolmonen (2000). A model for the control of a multileaf collimator in radiation therapy treatment planning. Inverse Problems, 16, 1875–1895.CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Webb, S. (1998). Configuration options for intensity-modulated radiation therapy using multiple static fields shaped by a multileaf collimator. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 43, 241–260.ADSPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Wu, X. and Y. Zhu (2001). A global optimization method for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy treatment planning. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 46, 109–119.ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    van der Eijk, P. (2002). GDX facilities in GAMS. GAMS Contributed Software, http://www.gams.com/contrib/GDXUtils.pdf.
  11. [11]
    Goitein, M., M. Abrams, S. Rowell, H. Pollari, and J. Wiles (1983). Multi-dimensional treatment planning: I. beam’s eye view, back projection, and projection through ct sections. International Journal of Radiation Oncology: Biology, Physics, 9, 789–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Webb, S. (1997). The Physics of Conformal Radiotherapy. Bristol, UK: Institute of Physics Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Brewster, L., G.S. Mageras, and R. Mohan (1993). Automatic-generation of beam apertures. Medical Physics, 20, 1337–1342.CrossRefADSPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Chen, G.T.Y., D.R. Spelbring, C.A. Pelizzari, J.M. Balter, L.C. Myrianthopoulous, S. Vijayakumar, and H. Halpern (1992). The use of beam eye view volumetrics in the selection of noncoplanar radiation portals. International Journal of Radiation Oncology: Biology, Physics, 23, 153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Cho, B.C.J., W.H. Roa, D. Robinson, and B. Murray (1999). The development of target-eye-view maps for selection of coplanar or non-23 coplanar beams in conformal radiotherapy treatment planning. Medical Physics, 26, 2367–2372.ADSPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    McShan, D.L. B.A. Fraass, and A.S. Lichter (1989). Full integration of the beam’s eye view concept into computerized treatment planning. International Journal of Radiation Oncology: Biology, Physics, 18, 1485–1494.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Myrianthopoulos, L.C., G.T.Y. Chen, S. Vijayakumar, H. Halpern, D. R. Spelbring, and C.A. Pelizzari (1992). Beams eye view volumetrics-an aid in rapid treatment plan development and evaluation. International Journal of Radiation Oncology: Biology, Physics, 23, 67–375.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Lim, J., M.C. Ferris, S.J. Wright, D.M. Shepard, and M.A. Earl (2002). An optimization framework for conformation radiation treatment planning. Optimization Technical Report 02-08, Computer Sciences Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Redpath, A.T., B.L. Vickery, and D.H. Wright (1976). A new technique for radiotherapy planning using quadratic programming. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 21, 781–791.CrossRefADSPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Shepard, D.M., M.C. Ferris, G. Olivera, and T.R. Mackie (1999). Optimizing the delivery of radiation to cancer patients. SIAM Review, 41, 721–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Starkschall, G. (1984). A constrained least-squares optimization method for external beam radiation therapy treatment planning. Medical Physics, 11, 659–665.CrossRefADSPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Bahr, G.K., J.G. Kereiakes, H. Horwitz, R. Finney, J. Galvin, and K. Goode (1968). The method of linear programming applied to radiation treatment planning. Radiology, 91, 686–693.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Langer, M. and J. Leong (1987). Optimization of beam weights under dose volume restriction. International Journal of Radiation Oncology: Biology, Physics, 13, 1255–1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Morrill, S., R. Lane, J. Wong, and I.I. Rosen (1991). Dose-volume considerations with linear programming. Medical Physics, 6, 1201–1210.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Rosen, I.I., R. Lane, S. Morrill, and J. Belli (1990). Treatment plan optimization using linear programming. Medical Physics, 18, 141–152.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Romeijn, H.E., R.K. Ahuja, and J.F. Dempsey (2003). A new linear programming approach to radiation therapy treatment planning problems. Technical Report, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Kontogiorgis, S. (2000). Practical piecewise-linear approximation for monotropic optimization. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 12, 324–340.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Ho, J.K. (1985). Relationships among linear formulations of separable convex piecewise linear programs. Mathematical Programming Study, 24, 126–140.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Choi, B. and J. O’Deasy (2002). The generalized equivalent uniform dose function as a basis for intensity-modulated treatment planning. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 47, 3579–3589.ADSPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Ferris, M.C. (1998). MATLAB and GAMS interfacing optimization and visualization soft ware. Mathematical Programming Technical Report 98-19, Computer Sciences Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    Rowbottom, C.G., V.S. Khoo, and S. Webb (2001). Simultaneous optimization of beam orientations and beam weights in conformal radiotherapy. Medical Physics, 28, 1696–1702.CrossRefADSPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Langer, M., R. Brown, M. Urie, J. Leong, M. Stracher, and J. Shapiro (1990). Large-scale optimization of beam-weights under dose volume restrictions. International Journal of Radiation Oncology: Biology, Physics, 18, 887–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael C. Ferris
    • 1
  • Jinho Lim
    • 2
  • David M. Shepard
    • 3
  1. 1.Computer Sciences DepartmentUniversity of WisconsinMadison
  2. 2.Department of Industrial EngineeringUniversity of HoustonHouston
  3. 3.Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimore

Personalised recommendations