Skip to main content

DEA and Multicriteria Decision Modeling

  • Chapter
Modeling Performance Measurement
  • 1385 Accesses

Conclusions

This chapter has examined MCDM problems in the context of DEA. A multicriteria composite index model is presented which can accommodate both qualitative and quantitative data. Various example problem settings are given. The chapter also extends the methodology to handle situations where some alternatives may be evaluated only in terms of a proper subset of the full set of criteria. The proposed approach is based on examining performance of an alternative relative to an ideal status for that alternative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ang, J., and T. Lai (1990), The discount rate for overseas investments under exchange and political risk, In Pacific-Basin Capital Markets Research, 467–483.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blask, J. (1978), A survey of country evaluation systems in use, Financing and Risk in Developing Countries, Praeger, 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes (1978), Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research 2, 429–444.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Cook, W.D., J. Doyle, R. Green and M. Kress (1997), Multiple criteria modeling and ordinal data: Evaluation in terms of subsets of criteria, European Journal of Operational Research98, 602–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cook, W.D., and M. Kress (1994), A multiple-criteria composite index model for quantitative and qualitative data, European Journal of Operational Research 78, 367–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cook, W.D., and K.J. Hebner (1993), A multicriteria approach to country risk evaluation: with an example employing Japanese data, International Review of Economics and Finance 2, 327–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cook, W.D., and D.A. Johnston (1992), Evaluating suppliers of complex systems: a multiple criteria approach, Journal of Operational Research Society 43(11), 1055–1061.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cook, W.D., and M. Kress (1991), A multiple crisis decision model with ordinal preference data, European Journal of Operational Research 54, 191–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fishbein, M (1967), A behavioral theory approach to the relations between beliefs about an object and the attitude towards the object, in M. Fishbein (ed.), Readings in Attitude and Theory Measurement, Wiley, New York, 389–399.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goddard, S. (1990), Political risk in international capital budgeting, Managerial Finance 16, 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hwang, C.-L., and K. Yoon (1981), Multiple attribute decision-making methods and applications, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, no. 186, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Keeney, R.L., and H. Raiffa (1976), Decisions with multiple objectives, preferences and value tradeoffs, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kobrin, S. (1986), Assessing political risk overseas, The Multinational Enterprise in Transition, 425–439.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Korhonen, P., and J. Wallenius (1990), Using qualitative data in multiple objective linear programming, European Journal of Operational Research 48, 81–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Oral, H., and R. Yolalan (1990), An empirical study of measuring operating efficiency and profitability of bank branches, European Journal of Operational Research 46, 282–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Parker, B.R., and V. Srinivasan (1976), A consumer preference approach to the planning of rural primary health care facilities, Operations Research 24, 991–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Phillips-Patrick, F. (1989), The effect of asset and ownership structgure on political risk: evidence from Mitterrand’s election in France, Journal of Banking and Finance, 651–671.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Phillips-Patrick, F. (1990), Ownership, asset structure, and political risk, Financial Planning and Forecasting: International Dimensions of Securities and Currency Markets, JAI Press, 239–256

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rosenberg, M.J. (1956), Cognitive structure and attitudinal affect, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53, 367–372.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Saaty, T.L. (1980), The analytic hierarchy process, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sherman, H.D., and F. Gold (1985), Bank branch operating efficiency: evaluation with data envelopment analysis, Journal of Banking and Finance 9, 297–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Srinivasan, V., and A.D. Shocker (1973), Estimating the weights for multiple attributes in a composite criterion using pairwise judgements, Psychometrika 38, 473–493.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Ting, W. (1988), Multinational risk assessment and management, Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2005). DEA and Multicriteria Decision Modeling. In: Modeling Performance Measurement. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24138-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics