Skip to main content

Assessing Competency in Criminal Proceedings

  • Chapter
Forensic Psychology

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bagby, R. M., Nicholson, R. A., Rogers, R., & Nussbaum, D. (1992). Domains of competency to stand trial: A factor analytic study. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 491–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, G. W., Thompson, J. W., Freeman, W. C., Robbins, L., Gies, D., & Hankins, G.C. (1991). Competency to stand trial: Description and initial evaluation of a new computer-assisted assessment tool (CADCOMP). Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 19, 367–381.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnie, R. J. (1993). The competence of criminal defendants: Beyond Dusky and Drope. University of Miami Law Review, 47, 539–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnie, R. J. (1992). The competence of criminal defendants: A theoretical reformulation. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 10, 291–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Everington, C. T. (1990). The competence for standing trial for defendants with mental retardation (CAST-MR): A validation study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 147–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford v. Wainwright, 477 US 399 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • George Jr., B. J. (reporter) (1989). ABA Criminal Justice Mental Health Standards. Washington, D.C.: American Bar Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godinez v. Moran, 509 U.S. 389 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Golding, S. S., Roesch, R., & Schreiber, J. (1984). Assessment and conceptualization of competency to stand trial: Preliminary data on the Interdisciplinary Fitness Interview. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 321–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gothard, S., Viglione Jr., D. J., Meloy, J. R., & Sherman, M., (1995). Detection of malingering in competency to stand trial evaluations. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 493–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gothard, S., Rogers, R., & Sewell, K. W. (1995). Feigning incompetency to stand trial. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 363–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoge, S. K., Bonnie, R. J., Poythress, N., Monahan, J., Eisenberg, M., & Feucht-Haviar, T. (1997). The MacArthur adjudicative competence study: Development and validation of a research instrument. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 141–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoge, S. K., Bonnie, R. J., Poythress, N., & Monahan, J. (1999). The MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Criminal Adjudication. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson v. Indiana, 406 U.S. 715 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, J. W. & Mulick, J. A. (eds.) (1996) Manual of diagnosis and professional practice in mental retardation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laboratory of Community Psychiatry. (1973). Competency to stand trial and mental illness. DHEW Publication No. ADM77-103. Rockville, MD: Department of Health, Education and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladds, B. & Convit, A. (1994). Involuntary medication of patients who are incompetent to stand trial: A review of empirical studies. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 22, 519–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. D. (1994). Criminal competence. In Rosner, R. (Ed.) Principles and practice of forensic psychiatry, (pp. 174–197). New York, NY: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nestor, P.G., Daggett, D., Haycock, J. & Price, M. (1999) Competence to stand trial: A neuropsychological inquiry. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 397–412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, R. A., Briggs, S. R., & Robertson, H. (1988). Instruments for assessing competency to stand trial: How do they work? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19, 383–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobles v. State of Georgia, 168 U.S. 398 (1897).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohayon, M. M., Crocker, A., St-Onge, B. & Caulet, M. (1998). Fitness, responsibility, and judicially ordered assessments. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 43, 491–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pate v. Robinson, 383 U.S. 375 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry v. Louisiana, 498 US 38 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Plotnick, S., Porter, J., & Bagby, M. (1998) Is there bias in the evaluation of fitness to stand trial? International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 21, 291–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phyle v. Duffy, 34 Cal. 2d 144 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, J., & Tookey, L. (1986). Disagreements between court and psychiatrist on competency to stand trial. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 47, 616–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggins v. Nevada, 504 U.S. 127 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roesch, R. & Golding, S. L. (1980). Competency to stand trial. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeem, J. L., Golding, S. L., Cohn, N. B., & Berge, G. (1998). Logic and reliability of evaluations of competence to stand trial. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 519–547.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strafer, G. R. (1983). Volunteering for execution: Competency, voluntariness and the propriety of third party intervention. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 74, 860–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ustad, K. L., Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W. & Guarnaccia, C. A. (1996). Restoration of competency to stand trial: Assessment with the Georgia Court Competency Test and the Competency Screening Test. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 131–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, M., & Raifman, L.J. (1997). Recognizing and handling problems of incompetent deaf defendants charged with serious offenses. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 20, 373–387.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildman, R. W., II, Batchelor, E. S., Thompson, L., Nelson, F. R., Moore, J. T., Patterson, M.E., & DeLaosa, M. (1978). The Georgia Court Competency Test: An attempt to develop a rapid, quantitative measure of fitness for trial. Unpublished manuscript, Forensic Services Division, Central State Hospital, Milledgeville, GA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abrams, A.A. (2002). Assessing Competency in Criminal Proceedings. In: Van Dorsten, B. (eds) Forensic Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47923-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47923-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-47270-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47923-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics