This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ball, J. D., Archer, R.P., Imhof, E. A. (1994). Time requirements of psychological testing: A survey of practitioners. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 239–249.
Belter, R. W. & Piotrowski, C. (1999). Current status of Master’s level training in psychological assessment. Journal of Psychological Practice, 5 (1), 1–5.
Boccaccini, M. T. & Brodsky, S. L. (1999). Diagnostic test use by forensic psychologists in emotional injury cases. Professional psychology: Research and Practice, 31, (1), 251–259.
Borum, R. & Grisso, T. (1995). Psychological test use in criminal forensic evaluations. Professional Psychology, 26, 465–473.
Butcher, J. N. & Williams, C. L. (1992). MMPI-2 and MMPI-A: Essentials of clinical interpretation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Butcher, J. N. (1999). A beginner’s guide to the MMPI-2. Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.
Butcher, J. N. (2000). Dynamics of personality test responses: The empiricist’s manifesto revisited. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 56 (3), 1–12.
Butcher, J. N. (in press). Computer-based assessment strategies for clinical decision making. In J. R. Graham & J. A. Naglieri (Eds.). Handbook of assessment psychology.
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals. 113S. Ct 2786 (1993).
Downey, R. B., Sinnett, E. R. & Seeberger, W. (1998) The changing face of MMPI practice. Psychological Reports, 83 (3, Pt 2), 1267–1272.
Frauenhoffer, D., Ross, M. J., Gfeller, J., Searight, H. R., & Piotrowski, C. (1998). Psychological test usage among licensed mental health practitioners: A multidisciplinary survey. Journal of Psychological Practice, 4 (1), 28–33.
Goodman-Delahunty, J. & W. E. (1995). Compensation for pain and suffering and other psychological injuries: The impact of Daubert on employment discrimination claims. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 13, 183–206.
Goodman-Delahunty, J. (1997). Forensic psychological expertise in the wake of Daubert. Law and Human Behavior, 21(2), 121–140.
Graham, J. R. (2000). MMPI-2: Assessing personality and psychopathology. Third Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Greene, R. L. (1991). MMPI-2/MMPI: An interpretive manual, Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Grove, W. M. & Meehl, P. E. (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 293–323.
Hess, A. K. (1999). Serving as an expert witness. In A. Hess & I. Wiener (Eds.) Handbook of forensic psychology (Second edition). (Pp. 521–555). New York: Wiley.
Lees-Haley, P. R. (1992). Psychodiagnostic test usage by forensic psychologists. Amerian Journal of Forensic Psychology, 10, 25–30.
Lees-Haley, P. R., Smith, H. W., Williams, C. W. & Dunn, J. T. (1996). Forensic neuropsychological test usage: An empirical survey. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 11, 45–51.
London Times (1999, December 3). U. S. lawyer in clash with QC over Al Fayad (p.6).
McMinn, M. R., Buchanan, T., Ellens, B. M., & Ryan, M. (1999). Technology, professional practice, and ethics: Survey of findings and implications. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 30 (2), 165–172.
Meehl, P. E. (1997). Credentialed persons, credentialed knowledge. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 4, 91–98.
Melton, G. et al. (1999). Training in forensic psychology and the law. In A. K. Hess & I. I. Weiner (Eds). The handbook of forensic psychology. (Pp. +++). New York: Wiley.
Millon, T. F. (1994). MCMI-III: Manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
Nelson, L. D., Pham, D., & Uchiyama, C. (1996). Subtlety of the MMPI-2 Depression Scale: A subject laid to rest? Psychological Assessment, 8, 331–333.
News Release (1999). Expert witnesses and the new civil procedure rules. The Psychologist, 12, (12), p. 582.
Penrod, S. D., Solomon, M., Fulero, J. D., and Cutler, B. (1995). Expert testimony on eyewitness reliability before and after Daubert: The state of the law and the science. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 13, 229–259.
Piotrowski, C. (1993). Legal issues in the inpatient setting: A framework for literature retrieval strategies. In M. B. Squire, et al. (Eds.) Current advances in inpatient psychiatric care: A handbook. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.
Piotrowski, C. (1998). Assessment of pain: A survey of practicing clinicians. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 181–182.
Pope, K. S., Butcher, J. N., & Seelen, J. (2000). MMPI/MMPI-2/MMPI-Ain court: Assessment, testimony, and cross-examination for expert witnesses and attorneys. (Second edition) Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association
Reed, J. E. (1995). Fixed vs. flexible neuropsychological test batteries under the Daubert Standard for the admissibility of evidence. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 13, 315–322.
Rogers, R., Gillis, J. R., Dickens, S. E. & Bagby, M. (1991). Standardized assessment of malingering: Validation of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms. Psychological Assessment, 3(1), 89–96.
Rogers, R., Salekin, R. T. & Sewell, K. W. (1999). Validation of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory for Axis II disorders: Does it meet Daubert standard? Law & Human Behavior, 23, (4), 425–443.
Rorschach Workshops, “MMPI-2 Workshops,” Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Asheville, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Rorschach Workshops, “MMPI-2 Workshops,” Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Asheville, North Carolina.
Rotgers, F. & Barrett, D. (1996). Daubert v Merrell Dow and expert testimony by clinical psychologists: Implications and recommendations. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 27 (5), 467–474.
Schopp, R. F. & Quattrocchi, M. R. (1995). Predicting the present: Expert testimony and civil commitment. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 13, 159–181.
Weed, N. C., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Butcher, J. N. (1990). Failure of the Weiner-Harmon MMPI subtle scales as predictors of psychopathology and as validity indicators. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2, 281–283.
Wiener, D. N. (1948). Subtle and obvious keys for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory/ Journal of Consulting Psychology, 12, 164–170.
Weiner, I. (1999). Writing forensic reports. In A. K. Hess & I.I. Weiner (Eds). The handbook of forensic psychology. (Pp. +++). New York: Wiley.
Wetter, M. W. & Corrigan, S. K. (1995). Providing information to clients about psychological tests: A survey of attorney’s and law student’s attitudes. Professional Psychology, 26, 495–474.
Zonana, H. (1994). Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals: A new standard for scientific evidence in the courts. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 22 (2), 309–325.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Butcher, J.N. (2002). Assessment in Forensic Practice. In: Van Dorsten, B. (eds) Forensic Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47923-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47923-0_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-47270-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47923-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive