Studying the Functionality and Webometric Indicators of Specialized Science-Related Websites

Information Analysis

Abstract

A review is provided of the purposes, functionality, and webometric indicators (WMIs) for the websites of the leading international organizations that aggregate specialized scientific information, including citation and scientometric systems; websites designed to support national publications; etc. The WMIs of foreign websites are compared with those of the functionally similar Russian online resources. An overview is given of the structure of foreign and Russian websites that publish information related to dissertations, their extended abstracts, and their full-text versions. The terms of user access to these materials are described. The WMIs of these websites are compared. An analysis is conducted of the functionality and WMIs of the following online resources: the leading foreign and Russian websites that provide access to autonomous information–analytical and information systems for scientific journals; websites of individual journals related to scientometric studies and information management (services) in science.

Keywords

scientific information content-aggregator organizations websites thematic specialization dissertations extended abstracts functional specialization webometric indicators information and telecommunication technologies web analytics Internet user behavior 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Brumshteyn, Yu.M. and Vas’kovskii, E.Yu., Analysis of the webometric indicators of the main websites that aggregate multithematic scientific information, Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist., 2017, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 250–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Osipova, V.A., National Electronic Library: History, structure, and a new stage of development, Univ. Kn., 2013, no. 10, pp. 64–66.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sokolova, M.E., Russian Regional Index of Scientific Citation: Innovations and problems, Intell. Kap., 2016, no. 3, pp. 2–6.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shabanova, S.M., Scientific electronic library: Rules change, essence persists, Intell. Kap., 2016, no. 2 (4), pp. 29–33.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arskii, Yu.M. and Bykov, V.A., The activities of VINITI RAS as a key organization of the Commonwealth of Independent States for the exchange of scientific and technological information, Sci. Tech. Inf. Process., 2013, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Biktimirov, M.R., Glebskii, V.L., Dolgov, B.V., and Polikarpov, S.A., Use of information technologies and infrastructures for the aggregation of scientific information. Experience of Canada, the Netherlands, and the United States, Model. Anal. Inf. Sist., 2015, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 114–126.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gurov, A.N., Goncharova, Yu.G., and Bubyakin, G.B., Open access to scientific knowledge: Its state, problems, and prospects of development, Sci. Tech. Inf. Process., 2016, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Furniss, K. and Trifonova, A.V., Variants of access to resources for researchers: Where to look for resources in the technical sciences?, Din. Sist. Mekh. Mash., 2014, no. 5, pp. 87–89.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Björk, Bo-Ch., Open access to scientific publications—an analysis of the barriers to change?, Inf. Res., 2004, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 170. http://hdl.handle.net/10227/647. Accessed July 4, 2017.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zatsman, I.M., Electronic libraries of scientific documents on the Internet: Structuring, formal description, and search for non-verbal information, Nauchno-Tekh. Inf., Ser. 2, 1998, no. 11, pp. 12–18.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Laruk, O. and Garanovich, M.V., Assessment of access to scientific information for academic users on the Internet, Global. Nauchn. Potentsial, 2014, no. 9 (42), pp. 135–138.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Golitsina, O.L., Kupriyanov, V.M., and Maksimov, N.V., Information and technological solutions applied for knowledge-management tasks, Sci. Tech. Inf. Process., 2015, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 150–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Polyak, Yu.E., Estimation and ranking of web sites. Webometric ratings, Nauchn. Red. Izd., 2017, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 19–29.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lebedenko, M.S., Webometrics rank as index of effectiveness of web-site of enterprise, Ekon. Visn. Nats. Tekh. Univ. Ukr. Kiev. Politekh. Inst., 2014, no. 11, pp. 401–408.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gilyarevskii, R.S., Publication activity as an indicator of scientific performance, Sci. Tech. Inf. Process., 2014, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 170–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brumshtein, Yu.M., Kuz’mina, A.B., and Yakovleva, L.V., Publication policy of a regional higher educational institution in the context of managing its scientific image, Prikasp. Zh.: Upr. Vys. Tekhnol., 2013, no. 2 (22), pp. 99–109.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Arkhipov, D.B., Bulyanitsa, A.L., and Shcherbakov, A.P., Webometric analysis and its use for studying the trends in the development of analytical instrument making, Nauchn. Priborostr., 2014, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 52–60.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Syuntyurenko, O.V. and Gilyarevskii, R.S., Use of scientometrics methods and comparative analysis of data for the management of scientific research on thematic areas, Nauchno-Tekh. Inf., Ser. 2, 2016, no. 12, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lopatina, N.V., The information infrastructure of society: Problems of research and management, Sci. Tech. Inf. Process., 2016, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 95–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brumshtein, Yu.M., An analysis of the impact of information and communication technology on the structure of scientific and technical information in Russia, Sci. Tech. Inf. Process., 2016, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 257–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Galyavieva, M.S., On the formation of the concept of informetrics (review), Sci. Tech. Inf. Process., 2013, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pechnikov, A.A. and Tarakanovskii, N.A., Comparison of webometric ranking of RAS institutes and their reference popularity in Russian Wikipedia, Nauchnoobrazovatel’naya informatsionnaya sreda XXI veka. Materialy IX Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (Scientific and Educational Information Environment of the 21st Century. Proc. IX All-Russian Sci. Pract. Conf.), Petrozavodsk, 2015, pp. 148–150.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brumshtein, Yu.M., Vas’kovskii, E.Yu., and Kuanshkaliev, T.Kh., Searching for information on the Internet: Analysis of influencing factors and patterns of user behavior, Izv. Volgogr. Gos. Tekh. Univ., 2017, no. 1 (196), pp. 50–55.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Filozova, I.A., Open archives of scientific information, Sist. Anal. Nauke Obraz., 2010, no. 1, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Matushanskii, G.U. and Vitol’, E.V., A university scientific journal: Problems of inclusion into foreign abstract databases, Vestn. Kazan. Gos. Energ. Univ., 2013, no. 3 (18), pp. 170–173.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Prabakaean, R. and Lihitkar Shalini, Websites of astronomy and astrophisics libraries in India and USA: A webometric study, J. Libr. Inf. Sci., 2015, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 199–205.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Efremenkova, V.M. and Krukovskaya, N.V., Chemical Abstracts service centennial: Facts and figures, Sci. Tech. Inf. Process., 2007, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 328–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shalaeva, T.Z., National information resource: A hierarchical model and structure, Vestn. Polotsk. Gos. Univ., Ser. D: Ekon. Yuridich. Nauki, 2014, no. 6, pp. 119–122.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Petrov, V.V., Onyshchenko, O.S., Kryuchyn, A.A., Lobuzina, K.V., Minina, N.M., and Zaichenko, N.Y., The development of national referencing system, Visn. Nats. Akad. Nauk Ukr., 2015, no. 10, pp. 71–74.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sazonets', O.M.V. and Pinchuk, O.L.D., Ukraine’s accession to European scientometrics systems, Visn. Zhitomir. Derzhavn. Tekhnol. Univ., Ser.: Ekon. Nauki, 2015, no. 3 (73), pp. 128–133.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Li Syui, Development and improvement of the Chinese database of the citation index of social and scientific articles, Vlast’, 2017, no. 2, pp. 176–181.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pislyakov, V.V., Why create national citation indexes, Nauchn. Tekh. Bibl., 2007, no. 2, p. 9. https://Library. hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/200171529. Accessed July 9, 2017.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sukhoruchkina, I.N., Databases in the national system of scientific and technical information of Japan, Nauchno-Tekh. Inf., Ser. 1, 2016, no. 6, pp. 27–35.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Negishi, M., Sun, Y., and Shigi, K., Citation database for Japanese papers: A new bibliometric tool for Japanese academic society, Scientometrics, 2004, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 333–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Khachko, O.A., Electronic library of full texts SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online): Functions and search capabilities, in Informatsionnoe obespechenie nauki. Novye tekhnologii. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov (Information Support of Science. New Technologies. Collection of Scientific Works), Kalenov, N.E., Ed., Moscow, 2011, pp. 273–280.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jahangiri Saeideh, Asnafi Amir Reza, Amir Hussein Rajabzadeh Assarha, and Maryam Pakdaman Naeini, Iranian scientific associations’ websites in the field of Humanities: A webometric study, COLLNET J. Sci. Inf. Manage., 2014, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 273–279. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2014.1015310Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Brumshtein, Yu.M., Zaitsev, V.F., and Sokol’skii, A.F., Analysis of dissertations and related materials in the light of copyright law, Intell. Sobstvennost’. Avtorsk. Pravo Smezhnye Prava, 2005, no. 12, pp. 2–13.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kopaneva, E.A., Webometric indicators of the scientific periodicals of Ukraine, Nauchn. Tekh. Bibl., 2013, no. 5, pp. 75–82.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Istomin, I.A. and Baikov, A.A., Comparative features of domestic and foreign scientific journals, Mezhdunar. Protsessy, 2015, vol. 13, no. 41, pp. 114–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tret'yakov, A.L. and Korol’, A.N., Using the methods of library and webometry in the study of the microflow of library science journals, Bibliosfera, 2015, no. 3, pp. 69–74.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Astrakhan State UniversityAstrakhanRussia

Personalised recommendations