Abstract
The Wisconsin Wetlands Inventory (WWI) was conducted by the State of Wisconsin, USA using a classification system and methods that are similar but not identical to those of the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI). Dissimilarities between the two inventories present problems for applications that cross state boundaries, such as inter-state comparisons or compilation of regional wetland statistics. The methods and classification systems of the two wetland inventories were compared, and GIS coverages were analyzed where the two inventories overlap near the cities of Superior and Baraboo. The NWI mapped both wetland and deepwater habitats and included Lacustrine and Riverine deepwater habitats that were intentionally not mapped by the WWI. Of the 178 km2 Superior study area, 52% was mapped as upland by both, 22% was mapped as wetland by both, 10% was mapped as Palustrine wetland by NWI but not WWI, and 6% was mapped as wetland by WWI but not NWI. Of the 281 km2 Baraboo study area, 91% was mapped as upland by both, 2% was mapped as wetland by both, 1% was mapped as Palustrine wetland by NWI but not WWI, and 1% was mapped as wetland by WWI but not NWI. Errors of omission were found for both inventories, but errors of commission (i.e., areas incorrectly mapped as wetland) were found only for the NWI maps in the Superior study area, which were prepared using 1:80,000 black and white panchromatic aerial photos. In theory and in practice, the two inventories were nearly equivalent with regard to Palustrine wetland class and subclass. The WWI “hydrologic modifier” has fewer categoriese than the NWI “water regime,” but a preliminary conversion table was developed to recode the WWI digital maps to their equivalent NWI categories based on the modal NWI water regime associated with each NWI class. Methods were developed for converting the WWI digital databases to make the two inventories more compatible; recommendations for future updates of the WWI include use of leaf-off color infrared aerial photography and merging of the digital WWI with a digital database of deepwater habitats.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatured Cited
Clayton, L. 1984. Pleistocene geology of the Superior region. Wisconsin. Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey. Madison, WI, USA. Information Circular 46.
Cowardin, L. M., V. Carter, F. C. Golet, and E. T. LaRoe. 1977. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (An Operational Draft). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services, Washington, DC, USA.
Cowardin, L. M., V. Carter, F. C. Golet, and E. T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services, Washington, DC, USA. FWS/OBS-79/31.
Epstein, E. J., E. J. Judziewicz, and W. A. Smith. 1997. Wisconsin’s Lake Superior coastal wetlands evaluation. Wisconsin’s Natural Heritage Inventory Program, Department of Natural Resources. Madison, WI, USA. PUB ER-095 99.
Gong, P. and J. Chen. 1992. Boundary uncertainty in digitized maps I: some possible determination methods. p. 274–281. In GIS LIS’92 Proceedings, San Jose, CA, Volume I. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Johnston, C. A. 1977. Some considerations for wetland inventories in Wisconsin. M.S. Thesis. University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Johnston, C. A. 1982a. Wisconsin Wetlands Inventory operational definition of wetland. Unpublished mimeo dated 5/2/82, file reference 13821. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, WI, USA.
Johnston, C. A. 1982b. Wetlands in the Wisconsin landscape. Wisconsin Academy Review 29:8–11.
Johnston, C. A. 1984. Mapping Wisconsin’s wetlands. Wisconsin Natural Resources 8:4–6.
Johnston, C. A. 1998. Geographic Information Systems in Ecology. Blackwell Science, Oxford, England.
Johnston, C. A., B. Marlett, and M. Riggle. 1988. Application of a computer-automated wetlands inventory to regulatory and management problems. Wetlands 8:43–52.
Johnston, C. A., C. A. Sersland, J. Bonde, D. Pomroy-Petry, and P. Meysembourg. 1996. Constructing detailed vegetation databases from field data and airborne videography. In Proceedings, Third International Conference/Workshop on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modeling, Santa Fe, NM [CD-ROM and on-line html document]. National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, Santa Barbara, CA, USA http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/conf/SANTA_FE_CD_ROM/sf_papers/johnston_carol/paper2.html
Johnston, C. A., A. Trauger, P. Meysembourg, R. Hawrot, and G. Walton. 1999. Natural Resources of Minnesota Point: Maps and Data in Support of the Minnesotas Point Environmental Management Plan (CD-ROM). Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN, USA. Technical Report NRRI/TR-99/11.
Johnston, C. A., S. D. Bridgham, and J. P. Schubauer-Berigan. 2001. Nutrient dynamics in relation to geomorphology of riverine wetlands. Soil Science Society of America Journal 65:557–577.
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDNR). 1997. Minnesota’s wetland resources [CD-ROM set]. Division of Waters, Minnesota Department of Naturals Resources, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Moorhead, K. K. and A. E. Cook. 1992. A comparisons of hydric soils, wetlands, and land use in coastal North Carolina. Wetlands 12:99–105.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 1997. Duluth—Superior Harbor, 31st edition (map). Chart #14975, 1:15,000. National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and Boundaries. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.
National Wetlands Inventory (NWI). 1990. Photointerpretation conventions for the National Wetlands Inventory. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory Center, St. Petersburg, FL, USA.
Niemann, B. J., Jr. 2001. Wisconsin Land Informations Program, FY 2000–2003 Strategic Assessment, Wetlands Mapping Plan Element. 3/7/01 Draft. Wisconsin Land Information Program, Office of Land Information Services, Wisconsin Department of Administration, Madison, WI, USA.
Sather, J. H. (ed.). 1976. Proceedings of the national wetland classification and inventory workshop. Office of Biological Services. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC, USA.
Tiner, R. W. 1990. Use of high-altitude aerial photographys for inventorying forested wetlands in the United States. Forest Ecology and Management 33/34:593–604.
Tiner, R. W. 1996. Wetlands. p. 475–494. In W. Philipson (ed.) Manual of Photographic Interpretation, 2nd edition. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Bethesda, MD, USA.
Tiner, R. W. 1997. NWI maps: what they tell us. National Wetlands Newsletter 19(2):7–12.
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR). 1978. Wisconsin lakes. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Bureau of Fish Management, Madison, WI, USA. Pub. 7-3600 (78).
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR). 1998. Wetlands report. Online document: http://www.dnr.state.wi.us/org/gmu/uprock/surfascewaterfiles/watersheds/wetlands.html
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR). 1999. Mazomanie Bottoms State Natural Area (No. 142). Online document: http://www.dnr.state.wi.us/org/land/er/snas/snas142.htm
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnston, C.A., Meysembourg, P. Comparison of the Wisconsin and National Wetlands Inventories. Wetlands 22, 386–405 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2002)022[0386:COTWAN]2.0.CO;2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2002)022[0386:COTWAN]2.0.CO;2