Abstract
The question whether and to what degree urbanization causes a decrease in diversity of animal and plant species and changes in community structure is still a matter of debate. While many studies used ground beetles, vertebrates, and butterflies as assumed model taxa, little work has been done with other, particularly insect, taxa. Here we report on rural and urban diversities of communities of carcass visiting destruent and predatory beetles (Coleoptera). From 8 rural and 2 city sites, we sampled 15323 destruent beetles representing 58 species and 1871 predators from 43 species. We observed a reduced diversity and changes in community structure of both beetle guilds towards the city. However, these changes were guild specific and our study gives no evidence that there are simple rules that govern rural and urban patterns of diversity. Species abundance distributions did not significantly differ between the study sites. There is also no evidence that the intermediate disturbance hypothesis might apply. Lastly, we found only little support for a homogenizing effect of urban environments on carrion visiting beetles.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- BR:
-
Discrepancy metric of nestedness
- NMS:
-
Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling
- S:
-
Species number
- UAO:
-
The number of unexpected species absences or occurrences per site
References
Aleksandrowicz, O. and K. Komosiński. 2005. On the fauna of carrion beetles (Coleoptera, Silphidae) of Mazurian Lakeland (north-eastern Poland). In: L. Sklodowski, S. Huruk, A. Barłevskis and S. Tarasiuk (eds), Protection of Coleoptera in the Baltic Sea Region. Agricultural University Press, Warsaw. pp. 147–153.
Angold, P. G., J. P. Sadler, M. O. Hill, S. Pullin, S. Rushton, K. Austin, E. Small, B. Wood R. Wadsworth, R. Sanderson and K. Thompson. 2006. Biodiversity in urban habitat patches. Sci. Total Environm. 360: 196–204.
Araujo, M. B. 2003.The coincidence of people and biodiversity in Europe. Gl. Ecol. Biogeogr. 12: 5–12.
Atmar, W. and B. D. Patterson. 1993. The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat. Oecologia 96: 373–382.
Blair, R. B., 1999. Birds and butterflies along an urban gradient: surrogate taxa for assessing biodiversity. Ecol. Appl. 9: 164–170.
Blair, R. B. and A. E. Launer. 1997. Butterfly diversity and human land use: species assemblages along an urban gradient. Biol. Cons. 80: 113–125.
Blair, R. B. 2004. The effects of urban sprawl on birds at multiple levels of biological organization. Ecology and Society 9. Online at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss5/art2/.
Brualdi, R. A. and J. G. Sanderson.1999. Nested species subsets, gaps, and discrepancy. Oecologia 119: 256–264.
Burnham, K. P. and W. S. Overton. 1978. Estimation of the size of a closed population when capture probabilities vary among animals. Biometrika 65: 623–633.
Chace, J. F. and J. J. Walsh. 2006. Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landscape Urban Planning 74: 46–69.
Clarke, K. R. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analysis of changes in community structure. Austr. J. Ecol. 18: 117–143.
Clergeau, P., J.-P. L. Savard, G. Mennechez and G. Falardeau. 1998. Bird abundance and diversity along an urban-rural gradient: A comparative study between two cities on different continents. Condor 100: 413–425.
Connell, J. H. 1978. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199: 1302–1310.
Cousins, S. A. O. and O. Eriksson. 2001. Plant species occurrences in a rural hemiboreal landscape: effects of remnant habitats, site history, topography and soil. Ecography 24: 461–469.
Elek, Z. and G. L. Lövei. 2007. Patterns in ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages along an urbanisation gradient in Denmark. Acta Oecol. 32: 104–111.
Eversham, B. C, B. D. Roy and M. G. Telfer. 1996. Urban industrial and other manmade sites as analogues of natural habitats for Carabidae. Ann. Zool. Fennici 33: 149–156.
Fahrig, L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Ann. Rev. Ecol, Evol. Syst. 34: 497–515.
Fisher, R. A., Corbet, A. S. and C. B. Williams. 1943. The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of an animal population. J. Anim. Ecol. 12: 42–58.
Freude, H., K. -W. Harde and G. A. Lohse. 1964–2004. Die Käfer Mitteleuropas. Goecke and Evers, Krefeld.
Gaston, K. J., R. M. Smith, K. Thompson and P. H. Warren. 2005. Urban domestic gardens (II): experimental tests of methods for increasing biodiversity. Biodiv. Conserv. 14: 395–413.
Gibbs, J. P. and E. J. Stanton. 2001. Habitat fragmentation and arthropod community change : carrion beetles, phoretic mites, and flies. Ecol. Appl. 11: 79–85.
Gotelli, N. J. 2000. Null model analysis of species co-occurrence patterns. Ecology 81: 2606–2621.
Gotelli, N. J. and G. L. Entsminger. 2005. EcoSim: Null models software for ecology. Version 7. Acquired Intelligence Inc. & Kesey-Bear. Burlington, VT 05465. available at http://homepages.together.net/~gentsmin/ecosim.htm.
Gotelli, N. J. and D. McCabe. 2002. Species co-occurrence: a meta-analysis of J. M. Diamond’s assembly rules model. Ecology 83: 2091–2096.
Gödde, M., N. Richarz and B. Wlater. 1995. Habitat conservation and developmentin the city of Düsseldorf, Germany. In: H. Sukopp, M. Numata and A. Huber (eds),Urban Ecology as the Basis for Urban Planning. SPB Academic Publ., The Hague, pp 163–171.
Gray, J. S. 1989. Effects of environmental stress on species rich assemblages. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 37: 19–32.
Heck, K. L., G. van Belle and G. Simberloff. 1975. Explicit calculation of the rarefaction diversity measurement and the determination of the sufficient sample size. Ecology 56: 1459–1461.
Hornung, E, B. Tótmérész, T. Magura andF. Vilisics. 2007. Changes of isopod assemblages along an urban-suburban-rural gradient in Hungary. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 43: 158–165.
Ishitani, M., D. J. Kotze and J. Niemelä. 2003. Changes in carabid beetle assemblages across an urban – rural gradient in Japan. Ecography 26: 481–489.
Jokimäki, J. and J. Suhonen. 1993. Effects of urbanization on the breeding bird species richness in Finland: a biogeographical comparison. Ornis Fennica 70: 71–77.
Knapp, S. 2005. Artenvielfalt in städtischen und ländlichen Schutzgebieten. Unpubl. Thesis, Univ. Tübingen.
Kotze, D. J., J. Niemelä, R. B. O’Hara and H. Turin. 2003. Testing abundance-range size relationships in European carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Ecography 26: 553–566.
Koch, K. 1989. Die Käfer Mitteleuropas. Ökologie. Vol. 1. Goecke and Evers, Krefeld.
Kühn, I. and S. Klotz. 2006. Urbanization and homogenization – Comparing the floras of urban and rural areas in Germnay. Biol. Conserv. 127: 292–300.
Magura, T., B. Tóthmérész and T. Molnár. 2004. Changes in carabid beetle assemblages along an urbanization gradient in the City of Debrecen, Hungary. Landscape Ecol. 19: 747–759.
McCune, B. and M. J. Mefford. 1999. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, Oregon.
McDonnell, M. J. and S. T. A. Pickett. 1990. Ecosystem structure and function along rural – urban gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology 71: 1232–1237.
McIntyre, N. E., J. Rango, W. F. Faga and S. H. Faeth. 2001. Ground arthropod community structure in a heterogeneous urban environment. Landscape Urban Planning 52: 257–274.
McKinney, M. L. 2004. Measuring floristic homogenization by non-native plants in North America. Gl. Ecol. Biogeogr. 13: 47–53.
Natuhara, Y. and C. Imai. 2006. Spatial structure of avifauna along urban – rural gradients. Ecol. Res. 11: 1–9.
Niemelä, J. 1999a. Ecology and urban planning. Biodiv. Conserv. 8: 119–131.
Niemelä, J. 1999b. Is there a need for a theory of urban ecology? Urban Ecosystems 3: 57–65.
Niemelä, J., D. Kotze, S. Venn, L. Penev, I. Stoyanov, J. Spence J., D. Hartley and E. de Oca. 2002. Carabid beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae) across urban-rural gradients: an international comparison. Landscape Ecol. 17: 387–401.
Olden, J. D., N. L. Poff, M. R. Douglas and K. D. Fausch. 2004. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of biotic homogenization. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 19: 18–24.
Olden, J. D., N. L. Poff and M. L. McKinney. 2006. Forecasting faunal and floral homogenization associated with human population geography in North America. Biol. Conserv. 127: 261–271.
Patterson, B. D. and W. Atmar. 2000. Analyzing species composition in fragments. Bonner Zoologische Monographien 46.
Pickett, S. T. A., M. L. Cadenasso and J. M. Grove. 2004. Resilient cities: meaning, models, and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic, and planning realms. Landscape Urban Planning 69: 369–384.
Rahel, F. J. 2002. Homogenization of freshwater faunas. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33: 291–315.
Ranta, P., A. Tanskanen and M. Siitonen. 1997 Vascular plants of the city of Vantaa, S. Finland – urban ecology, biodiversity and conservation. Lutukka 13: 67–87.
Rebele, F. 1994. Urban ecology and special features ofurban ecosystems. Gl. Ecol. Biogeogr. Lett. 4: 173–187.
Ricketts, T. and M. Imhoff. 2003. Biodiversity, urban area and agriculture: locating priority ecoregions for conservations. Conserv. Ecol. 8: 1.
Rosenzweig, M. L. 1995. Species Diversity in Space and Time. University Press Cambridge.
Sadler, J. P., E. C. Small, H. Fiszpan, M. G. Telfer and J. Niemelä. 2006 Investigating environmental variation and landscape characteristics of an urban–rural gradient using woodland carabid assemblages. J. Biogeogr. 33: 1126–1138.
Sheil, D. and D. Burslem. 2003 Disturbing hypotheses in tropical forests. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 18–26.
Smith, R. M., K. Thompson, J. G. Hodgson, P. H. Warren and K. J. Gaston. 2006. Urban domestic gardens (IX): Composition and richness of the vascular plant flora, and implications for native biodiversity. Biol. Conserv. 129: 312–322.
StatSoft Inc. 2005. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 7.1. available at www.statsoft.com.
Ulrich, W. 2006. Nestedness - a FORTRAN program for calculating ecological matrix temperatures. Available at www.uni.torun.pl/~ulrichw.
Ulrich, W. and N. J. Gotelli. 2007. Null model analysis of species nestedness patterns. Ecology: 88: 1824–1831.
Ulrich, W., K. Komosiński and M. Zalewski. 2007. Body size and biomass distributions of carrion visiting beetles: Do cities host smaller species? Ecol. Res. online first.
Vilisics, F, Z. Elek, G. L. Lövei and E. Hornung. 2007. Composition of terrestrial isopod assemblages along an urbanisation gradient in Denmark. Pedobiologia 51: 45–53.
Wania, A., I. Kühn and S. Klotz. 2006. Biodiversity patterns of plants in agricultural and urban landscapes in Central Germany - spatial gradients of species richness. Landscape Urban Planning 75: 97–110.
Watts, C. H. and M.-C Larivière. 2004. The importance of urban reserves for conserving beetle communities: a case study from New Zealand. J. Ins. Cons. 8: 47–58.
Wolf, J. M. and J. P. Gibbs. 2004. Silphids in urban forests: diversity and function. Urban Ecosyst. 7: 371–384.
Zhao, S., L. Da, Z. Tang, H. Fang, K. Song and J. Fang. 2006. Ecological consequences of rapid urban expansion: Shanghai, China Ecol. Environm. 4: 341–346.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Ulrich, W., Zalewski, M. & Komosiński, K. Diversity of carrion visiting beetles at rural and urban sites. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 8, 171–181 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.8.2007.2.4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.8.2007.2.4