Advertisement

Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 22, Supplement 3, pp 742–749 | Cite as

Surgical Management of Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors: Specific Requirements and Their Impact on Staging and Prognosis

  • Arnaud Pasquer
  • Thomas Walter
  • Valérie Hervieu
  • Julien Forestier
  • Jean-Yves Scoazec
  • Catherine Lombard-Bohas
  • Gilles Poncet
Endocrine Tumors

Abstract

Background

Small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SB-NETs) are characterized by two main features: they usually are metastatic at diagnosis and multiple in 30 % of cases. As such, SB-NETs require specific surgical management. This retrospective study examined local recurrence, survival, and prognosis of SB-NETs after adapted surgery.

Methods

All consecutive patients with SB-NETs who underwent resection of at least one primary tumor between 1 January 2000 and 1 January 2013 were analyzed. The preoperative morphologic workup, histologic classification, and metastatic lymph node (LN) ratio (LNs involved/removed) were recorded.

Results

The study enrolled 107 patients, 35 (33 %) of whom had multiple SB-NETs (range 1–44; mean 3.1). Preoperative imaging and perioperative surgical examination missed 61 and 33 % of SB-NETs, respectively, in contrast to pathologic examination. Of the 107 patients, 43 % had carcinoid syndrome, 70 % had metastatic disease, and 90 % had LN involvement. The median number of LNs retrieved was 12 (range 1–69). The LN ratio (LNs involved/removed) was 0.25. The highest tumoral grades were G1 (in 61 % of patients) and G2 (in 37 % of patients). Of the 107 patients, 13 (12 %) had local LN recurrence. The rate of LN recurrence-free survival at 5 years was 88 %. The median overall survival (OS) time was 128 months (range 91–165 months). In the multivariate analysis, high chromogranin A (CgA) levels and peritoneal carcinomatosis were significantly associated with shorter OS.

Conclusions

Systematic palpation of the entire small bowel detects more multiple NETs than preoperative imaging. Systematic surgery with extensive LN resection is associated with low local recurrence. High CgA levels and carcinomatosis are linked with shorter survival.

Keywords

Overall Survival Small Bowel Lymph Node Ratio Carcinoid Syndrome Video Capsule Endoscopy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A, et al. One hundred years after “carcinoid”: epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3063–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Modlin IM, Oberg K, Chung DC, et al. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:61–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ferrone CR. Lymphadenectomy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: is that the relevant debate? Ann Surg. 2014;259:213–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eriksson B, Kloppel G, Krenning E, et al. Consensus guidelines for the management of patients with digestive neuroendocrine tumors: well-differentiated jejunal-ileal tumor/carcinoma. Neuroendocrinology. 2008;87:8–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boudreaux JP, Klimstra DS, Hassan MM, et al. The NANETS consensus guideline for the diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine tumors: well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the jejunum, ileum, appendix, and cecum. Pancreas. 2010;39:753–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ramage JK, Ahmed A, Ardill J, et al. Guidelines for the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine (including carcinoid) tumours (NETs). Gut. 2011;61:6–32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hellman P, Lundstrom T, Ohrvall U, et al. Effect of surgery on the outcome of midgut carcinoid disease with lymph node and liver metastases. World J Surg. 2002;26:991–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Givi B, Pommier SJ, Thompson AK, et al. Operative resection of primary carcinoid neoplasms in patients with liver metastases yields significantly better survival. Surgery. 2006;140:891–7; discussion 897–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Strosberg J, Gardner N, Kvols L. Survival and prognostic factor analysis of 146 metastatic neuroendocrine tumors of the mid-gut. Neuroendocrinology. 2009;89:471–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Capurso G, Rinzivillo M, Bettini R, et al. Systematic review of resection of primary midgut carcinoid tumour in patients with unresectable liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2012;99:1480–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    van Tuyl SA, van Noorden JT, Timmer R, et al. Detection of small-bowel neuroendocrine tumors by video capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:66–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kamaoui I, De-Luca V, Ficarelli S, et al. Value of CT enteroclysis in suspected small-bowel carcinoid tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:629–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Landry CS, Lin HY, Phan A, et al. Resection of at-risk mesenteric lymph nodes is associated with improved survival in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors. World J Surg. 2013;37:1695–700.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang YZ, Joseph S, Lindholm E, et al. Lymphatic mapping helps to define resection margins for midgut carcinoids. Surgery. 2009;146:993–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Strosberg JR, Cheema A, Weber J, et al. Prognostic validity of a novel American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Classification for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2013;29:3044–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Durante C, Boukheris H, Dromain C, et al. Prognostic factors influencing survival from metastatic (stage IV) gastroenteropancreatic well-differentiated endocrine carcinoma. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2009;16:585–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rindi G, Kloppel G, Couvelard A, et al. TNM staging of midgut and hindgut (neuro) endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch. 2007;451:757–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bosman FT CF, Hruban RH. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. IARC, Lyon, 2010.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekind C (2009) TNM classification of malignant tumours. 7th ed. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Norlen O, Stalberg P, Oberg K, et al. Long-term results of surgery for small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors at a tertiary referral center. World J Surg. 2012;36:1419–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Landerholm K, Zar N, Andersson RE, et al. Survival and prognostic factors in patients with small bowel carcinoid tumour. Br J Surg. 2011;98:1617–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arnaud Pasquer
    • 4
  • Thomas Walter
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
  • Valérie Hervieu
    • 2
    • 3
    • 5
  • Julien Forestier
    • 1
  • Jean-Yves Scoazec
    • 2
  • Catherine Lombard-Bohas
    • 1
  • Gilles Poncet
    • 2
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Service de Gastroentérologie et d’oncologie digestiveLyon Cedex 03France
  2. 2.INSERM, UMR 1052, Lyon Cancer Research Center, Faculté LaennecLyon Cedex 08France
  3. 3.Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Service Central d’Anatomie et Cytologie PathologiquesLyon Cedex 03France
  4. 4.Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Chirurgie digestiveLyon Cedex 03France
  5. 5.Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1Villeurbanne CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations