Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 18, Issue 8, pp 2158–2165 | Cite as

Disparities in Reconstruction Rates After Mastectomy: Patterns of Care and Factors Associated with the Use of Breast Reconstruction in Southern California

  • Laura Kruper
  • Alicia Holt
  • Xin Xin Xu
  • Lei Duan
  • Katherine Henderson
  • Leslie Bernstein
  • Joshua Ellenhorn
Breast Oncology

Abstract

Background

Many factors influence whether breast cancer patients undergo reconstruction after mastectomy. We sought to determine the patterns of care and variables associated with the use of breast reconstruction in Southern California.

Materials and Methods

Postmastectomy reconstruction rates were determined from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) inpatient database from 2003 to 2007. International Classification of Disease-9 codes were used to identify patients undergoing reconstruction after mastectomy. Changes in reconstruction rates were examined by calendar year, age, race, type of insurance, and type of hospital using a chi-square test. Univariate and multivariate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated for relative odds of immediate reconstruction versus mastectomy only.

Results

In multivariate analysis, calendar year, age, race, type of insurance, and type of hospital were statistically significantly associated with use of reconstruction. The proportion of patients undergoing reconstruction rose from 24.8% in 2003 to 29.2% in 2007. Patients with private insurance were 10 times more likely to undergo reconstruction than patients with Medi-Cal insurance (OR 9.95, 95% CI 8.46–11.70). African American patients were less likely (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.46–0.73) and Asian patients one-third as likely (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.29–0.47) to undergo reconstruction as Caucasians patients Most reconstructive procedures were performed at teaching hospitals and designated cancer centers.

Conclusions

Although the rate of postmastectomy reconstruction is increasing, only a minority of patients undergo reconstruction. Age, race, type of insurance, and type of hospital appear to be significant factors limiting the use of reconstruction.

Keywords

African American Woman Private Insurance Breast Reconstruction Inflammatory Breast Cancer Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy 

References

  1. 1.
    Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:225–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Veronesi U, Marubini E, Mariani L, Galimberti V, Luini A, Veronesi P, et al. Radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery in small breast carcinoma: long-term results of a randomized control trial. Ann Oncol. 2001;12:997–1003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, Morris TJ, Virnig BA. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW. Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36:1938–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brandberg Y, Malm M, Blomqvist L. A prospective and randomized study “SVEA”, comparing effects of three methods for delayed reconstruction on quality of life, patient-defined problem areas of life, and cosmetic result. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:66–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rowland JH, Desmond KA, Meyerowitz BE, Nelin TR, Wyatt GE, Ganz PA. Role of breast reconstructive surgery in physical and emotional outcomes among breast cancer survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1422–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wilkins EG, Cederna PS, Lowery JC, Davis JA, Kim HM, Roth RS, et al. Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan breast reconstruction outcome study. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:1014–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Foster RD, Esserman LJ, Anthony JP, Hwang ES, Do H. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective cohort for the treatment of advanced stages of breast carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:462–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Howard MA, Polo K, Pusic AL, Cordeiro PG, Hidalgo DA, Mehrara B, et al. Breast cancer local recurrence after mastectomy and TRAM flap reconstruction: incidence and treatment options. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:1381–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Murphy RX Jr, Wahab S, Rovito PF. Impact of immediate reconstruction on the local recurrence of breast cancer after mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50:333–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Tadjalli HE, Singletary SE, Ames FC. Risk of recurrence after treatment of early breast cancer with skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 1997;4:193–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Medina-Franco H, Vasconez LO, Fix RJ, Heslin MJ, Beenken SW, Bland KI, et al. Factors associated with local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2002;235:814–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rosson GD, Singh NK, Ahuja N, Jacobs LK, Chang DC. Multilevel analysis of the impact of community vs. patient factors on access to immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy in Maryland. Arch Surg. 2008;143:1076–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Morrow M, Scott SK, Menck HR, Mustoe TA, Winchester DP. Factors influencing the use of breast reconstruction postmastectomy: a national cancer database study. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;192:1–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reuben BC, Manwaring J, Neumayer. Recent trends in immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy in the United States. Am J Surg. 2009;198:237–43.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Polednak AP. Geographic variation in postmastectomy breast reconstruction rates. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:298–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Veronesi U: NIH consensus meeting on early breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1990;26:843–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Freedman RA, He Y, Winer EP, Keating NL. Trends in racial and age disparities in local therapy of early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;27:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, Davies C, Elphinstone P, Evans E, et al. Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomized trials. Lancet. 2005;366:2087–106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Alderman AK, Wei Y, Birkmeyer JD. Use of breast reconstruction after mastectomy following the Women’s Health and Cancer Rights Act. J Am Med Assoc. 2006;387–8.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Polednak AP. How frequent if postmastectomy breast reconstructive surgery? A study linking the two statewide databases. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:73–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Christian CK, Niland J, Edge SB, Ottesen RA, Hughes ME, Theriault R, et al. A multi-institutional analysis of socioeconomic determinants of breast reconstruction. Ann Surg. 2006;243:241–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tseng JF, Kronowitz SJ, Sun CC, Perry AC, Hunt KK, Babiera GV, et al. The effect of ethnicity on immediate reconstruction rates after mastectomy for breast cancer. Cancer. 2004;101:1514–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Morrow M, Mujahid M, Lantz PM, Janz NK, Fagerlin A, Schwartz K, et al. Correlates of breast reconstruction. Cancer. 2005;104:2340–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Alderman AK, McMahon L, Wilkins EG. The national utilization of immediate and early delayed breast reconstruction and the effect of sociodemographic factors. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:695–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Joslyn SA. Patterns of care for immediate and early delayed breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2000;115:1289–96.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Desch CE, Penberthy LT, Hillner E, McDonald MK, Smith TJ, Pozez AL, et al. A sociodemographic and economic comparison of breast reconstruction, mastectomy and conservative surgery. Surgery. 1999;125:441–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lipa JE, Youssef AA, Kuerer HM, Robb GL, Chang DW. Breast reconstruction in older women: advantages of autogenous tissue. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:1111–21.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chen JY, Malin J, Ganz, Ko C, Tisnado D, Tao ML, et al. Variation in physician-patient discussion of breast reconstruction. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24:99–104.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bian J, Krontiras H, Allison J. Outpatient mastectomy and breast reconstructive surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;15:1032–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura Kruper
    • 1
  • Alicia Holt
    • 1
  • Xin Xin Xu
    • 2
  • Lei Duan
    • 2
  • Katherine Henderson
    • 2
  • Leslie Bernstein
    • 2
  • Joshua Ellenhorn
    • 1
  1. 1.General and Oncologic SurgeryCity of Hope National Medical CenterDuarteUSA
  2. 2.Population SciencesCity of Hope National Medical CenterDuarteUSA

Personalised recommendations