Unfortunately, the original version of this article [1] contained an error. A sentence in the statistical analysis section was written incorrectly. It was written wrongly as:
“If there was significant heterogeneity, we choose a fixed model; if there was no heterogeneity, we choose a random model.”
The correct form of this sentence is:
“If there was significant heterogeneity, we choose a random model; if there was no heterogeneity, we choose a fixed model.”
Reference
Wang X, Li ZY, Zeng L, Zhang AQ, Pan W, Gu W, Jiang JX. Neutrophil CD64 expression as a diagnostic marker for sepsis in adult patients: a meta-analysis. Critical Care. 2015;19:245.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/s13054-015-0972-z.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, X., Li, ZY., Zeng, L. et al. Erratum to: ‘Neutrophil CD64 expression as a diagnostic marker for sepsis in adult patients: a meta-analysis’. Crit Care 20, 172 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1357-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1357-7