Rapid protocol for visualization of rust fungi structures using fluorochrome Uvitex 2B
- 3.4k Downloads
Histological examination using fluorochromes is one of the standard methods for observation of microorganisms in tissues and other compartments. In the study of fungi, especially those that cannot be cultured in axenic media such as biotrophic fungi, histological examination of processes associated with the fungal growth, differentiation, infection and other cellular functions can lead to the better understanding of host-parasite interactions. Fluorescence microscopy coupled with Fluorochrome Uvitex 2B have been extensively utilized to study rust fungi structures and host-pathogen interactions. In this study, we report development of a rapid staining protocol of the rust fungus Puccinia triticina using fluorochrome Uvitex 2B. The newly developed rapid procedure was compared with a standard staining technique to observe in planta fungal infection structures development during the wheat—Puccinia triticina interaction.
While significantly reducing the time for staining, the rapid protocol described here was equally efficient or better compared to standard procedure in detecting fungal infection structures using Uvitex 2B. In the rapid staining procedure, pre-heating of the stain increased efficiency to detect all the infection structures including haustoria with highly reduced background noise from plant tissue.
This staining process described here is simple and quick. It can be completed in 4 h, which is of 6 times faster than the standard Uvitex 2B staining procedure.
KeywordsWheat Leaf rust Fungus Puccinia triticina Uvitex 2B Histology Staining Fluorescence microscopy Infection structures Host-pathogen interaction
Days post inoculation
Hours post incubation
Laser capture microdissection
Reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction
Histology is considered as one of the most appropriate technique to detect fungus and its infection structure development in plant and animal systems. The histological examination of fungal structure morphology and development during the infection process has offered valuable information to mycologists and plant pathologists for diagnosis, identification, classification of pathogenic microorganisms and their interaction with host and non-host plants specially when dealing with biotrophic fungi such as rust pathogens [1, 2]. In recent years a new interest in histology has been prompted by the availability of more powerful microscopes and the interest on connecting molecular and functional genomics discoveries to physical components. The fluorochromes Calcoflour White and Uvitex 2B and fluoresce microscopy have been extensively utilized to study rust fungi structures and host-pathogen interactions [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. Both fluorochromes, Uvitex 2B and Calcoflour White, bind to the chitin present in the fungal body wall allowing fungal detection [15, 16]. However, Calcoflour White fades away quickly when exposed to light, including it’s specific excitation wavelengths and stains plant structures containing cellulose making it difficult to differentiate fluorescence between the plant structures like trichomes, and fungal structures [14, 17, 18]. Therefore, Uvitex 2B has been more widely used to study rust fungi infection structures development in host and non-host interactions [1, 12, 19, 20, 21]. Currently used staining procedures are time consuming, and involve numerous chemical reagents including chloroform, methanol, lactophenol, ethanol, and NaOH. The procedure for fixation and staining of rust fungi as described by Kuck 1981  has been the most widely used for staining rust fungi. This protocol requires 12–18 h for fixing and clearing of specimens, depending on the stage of the plant development (adult or seedling) and staining requires an additional 5 h. The length of the protocol and numerous steps has limited its applicability when dealing with large number of specimens or when downstream molecular biology applications require intact cells and cell components such as nucleic acids.
The objective of the current study was to develop a rapid and less complex staining procedure that can be utilized to evaluate all infection structures during Puccinia triticina infection of wheat. We describe a rapid Uvitex 2B staining protocol that can be utilized for easy and comprehensive observation of the wheat leaf rust pathogen Puccinia triticina fungal structures in planta using wide-field fluorescence and structured illumination techniques. The newly developed rapid procedure was compared with the Uvitex 2B standard staining technique to observe in planta fungal infection structures development during wheat—Puccinia triticina interaction.
Results and discussion
Rapid protocol development and comparison to standard protocol
We have developed a rapid and effective way to stain wheat leaf tissue infected with the fungal pathogen P. triticina and were able to clearly observe and distinguish all fungal infection structures in planta in a time course experiment. In the newly developed rapid Uvitex 2B protocol there is only a single step involved for fixing and clearing the specimen and it reduced the time from 18 to 24 h to only 1 h. By pre-heating the fluorochrome Uvitex 2B a brighter staining of fungal structures and better contrast against plant cell was obtained.
Currently developed rapid staining protocol has several advantages over the standard Uvitex 2B staining protocol that has been used to study fungal infection process in planta. First, staining the specimens using this rapid staining procedure is fast and simple, fixation and staining can be completed within 1 and 3 h, respectively. Second, the pre-heating of the Uvitex 2B before the staining step allows for better detection of fungal structures including haustoria (when coupled with confocal microscopy) and provides a clear differentiation between host and fungal structures. Third, with this rapid staining procedure the number of chemical reagents is reduced which results in a lower cost per specimen.
Moreover, due to the short time required from collection to observation of specimens and rapid specimen fixation step, the rapid Uvitex 2B staining protocol is suitable for use in the preparation of samples for plant-cell isolations maintaining nucleic acid integrity. The ability to amplify RNA from excised cells from the Uvitex 2B stained samples demonstrates that the rapid staining protocol does not affect quality of RNA making this protocol suitable for specific cell gene expression studies.
Furthermore, the rapid staining procedure has been successfully applied to other rust pathogen-host and non-host interaction including Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici-Hordeum vulgare, P. triticina—Triticum turguidum subsp. durum, P. triticina—H. vulgare and Puccinia coronata f. sp. avenae—Avena sativa (data not shown). Future work will determine if the rapid staining protocols can be utilized in other pathosystems outside of the cereal rusts.
Wheat cultivar Thatcher , susceptible to most of the known wheat leaf rust races was used in this study. Seedling were grown in flats in a rust free greenhouse at (18–21 °C day, 16–18 °C night, 16 h photoperiod) until second leaf stage was reached (primary leaf fully expanded).
The experimental design was a completely randomized design, with each cell containing three seedlings considered as an experimental unit replication. Three replications were used for microscopic observations at 2 h post incubation (hpi), 4, 6, 12, 18, 24, 48, 72, 96 hpi and 7 days post inoculation (dpi) for both staining methods (rapid and traditional staining methods).
A single spore isolate of the wheat leaf rust pathogen, Puccinia triticina, race THBL was used for inoculation. Fresh spores were utilized and urediniospores concentration was adjusted to 6.2 × 105 spores per ml in Soltrol 170 oil. Inoculations were done using a spray inoculator at secondary leaf stage. After inoculation plants were allowed to dry for 30 min before incubation in a mist chamber with a 100 % relative humidity (RH) for 16 h in dark and then transferred to a greenhouse compartment kept at 18–22 °C (day) and 18–20 °C (night) with a 16 h photoperiod, and 80 % RH.
For all microscopic observations two 3-cm leaf pieces from the central portion of primary leaf were collected in a time course at 6, 24, 48, 72, 96 hpi and 7 dpi. After cutting the leaf tissue all specimens were placed in a plastic centrifuge tube and placed in an ice bath until further processing.
Development of rapid staining protocol
Combinations of staining temperature and pre-staining incubation time tested to determine best conditions to differentiate fungal structures when staining wheat leaf specimens inoculated with P. triticina
Room temperature (min)
65 °C (min)
Pre-staining incubation time
Standard staining procedure
To determine if the new rapid protocol provided reliable data, equal or better than the previously described Uvitex 2B staining protocols, a second set of specimens from the experiment described above were stained using the standard protocol which is a modified version of Rohringer et al.  as described by Moldenhauer et al. . This protocol was used as the standard as it has been the most widely used procedure in previously published histological evaluation research using Uvitex 2B [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. Briefly, infected leaves were fixed and cleared with lactophenol-ethanol or chloroform–methanol mostly by boiling method, and then washed with a series of different solutions including ethanol, NaoH, and water before and after staining the specimens.
Three primary leaves sections (2 cm each) from each of the three replicates were collected and six slides (two slides per each primary leaf) were mounted for microscopic observations. A total of 10–15 infection units were observed per each slide per time point and images of representative infection sites were acquired. Specimens were examined under wide-field fluorescence using an Zeiss Axio Imager M2 research epifluorescence upright microscope with an excitation filter BP379-401; chromatic beam splitter FT 420; emission 435–485; using AxioVision rel. 4.8 software. All observations were carried at 5×, 20× and 40×. For confocal microscopy and haustoria observation, specimens were observed using Zeiss Axio Observer Z1 inverted microscope with LSM700 laser scanning unit, 405 solid state laser at 40× magnification. Staining procedures were evaluated for their efficiency in visualizing pathogen infection structures including spore, germ tube, appressorium, sub-stomatal vesicle (SSV), haustorial mother cell (HMC) and haustorium; and background noise from staining host structures.
SD, and MA designed the study, obtained data, interpreted the results and drafted the manuscript. PB developed the measuring procedure and the assessment fluorescent microscopic images of wheat leaves. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors would like to thank Matthew Breiland and Sheri Dorsam for their technical support. This research was supported in part by National Science Foundation Grant # HRD-0811239 to the NDSU Advance FORWARD program, the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant no. 2009-65203-05696 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture to the NDSU Advance Imaging and Microscopy Center, ND State Board of Agricultural Research and Education (SBARE) and the North Dakota Wheat Commission.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
- 2.Swertz CA. Morphology of germlings of urediospores and its value for the identification and classification of grass rust fungi. Stud Mycol. 1994;36:1–80.Google Scholar
- 9.Wang X, McCallum BD, Fetch T, Bakkeren G, Maraias GF, Saville BJ. Comparative microscopic and molecular analysis of Thatcher near-isogenic lines with wheat leaf rust resistance genes Lr2a, Lr3, LrB or Lr9 upon challenge with different Puccinia triticina races. Plant Pathol. 2012;62:698–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Monheit JE, Cowan DF, Moore DG. Rapid detection of fungi in tissues using calcofluor white and fluorescence microscopy. Arch Patho Lab Med. 1984;108(8):616–8.Google Scholar
- 24.Nyarko J, Michael G, Wang Z. Application of laser microdissection to study plant-fungal pathogen interactions. Molecular and cell biology methods for fungi. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;638.Google Scholar
- 25.Hayes HK, Ausemus ER, Stakman EC, Bailey CH, et al. Thatcher wheat. Minn Agric Exp Stn. 1936;325.Google Scholar
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.