Advertisement

BMC Nephrology

, 19:115 | Cite as

Early renal damage among children living in the region of highest burden of chronic kidney disease of unknown etiology (CKDu) in Sri Lanka

  • S. B. Agampodi
  • G. S. Amarasinghe
  • P. G. C. R. Naotunna
  • C. S. Jayasumana
  • S. H. Siribaddana
Open Access
Research article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Epidemiology and Health Outcomes

Abstract

Background

Chronic kidney disease of unknown origin (CKDu) in Sri Lanka is grouped with several other epidemics of similar nature across the world as Chronic Interstitial Nephritis in Agricultural Communities (CINAC). In CKDu endemic countries, the focus has mainly been on adults. We hypothesized that studying distribution and factors associated with elevated urine albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR), an early marker of kidney injury, among children living in a CKDu endemic area may provide important clues about the onset and progression of the disease.

Methods

This cross sectional study was performed in rural primary schools in North Central Province of Sri Lnaka, a CKDu high endemic region. Total of 2880 students aging 5 to 11 years from 67 schools were enrolled for urinalysis in a random spot urine sample. Bedside Schwartz formula was used to measure estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) on all children with UACR > 30 mg/g in Polonnaruwa district and a group of age matched controls. A standard multiple linear regression using log transformed UACR as the dependent variable was performed. Mean eGFR were compared between UACR elevated group and controls using independent sample t test.

Results

Median UACR was 10.3 mg/g. Sex, ethnicity, history of having a chronic disease and age uniquely contributed to the multiple regression model which only explained 2.8% of the variance in the log of the UACR (p < 0.001). Only 15 (0.5%) had UACR> 300 mg/g while 8.2% (n = 236) had UACR between 30 to 300 mg/g and 89.8% (n = 203) of them did not have a chronic disease (Chi square 2.21, p = 0.091). Mean eGFR was significantly lower in the group with elevated UACR (88.9 mg/dl/1.73 m2, 95% CI for mean 86.4- 91.3) compared to group with normal UACR (93.7 mg/dl/1.73 m2,95% CI 91.1- 96.3) (t 2.7, p 0.007). Three out of the four students with eGFR less than 60 mg/dl/1.73 m2 had moderately elevated UACR.

Conclusion

This study provides evidence to suggest that children in CKDu endemic regions are having an early renal damage. This observation needs to be investigated further in order to understand the worldwide epidemic of CKDu.

Abbreviations

CINAC

Chronic Interstitial Nephritis in Agricultural Communities

CKDu

Chronic Kidney Disease of Unknown Origin

eGFR

Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate

NCP

North Central Province

NKF

National Kidney Foundation

WHO

World Health Organization

Background

Epidemics of chronic kidney disease of unknown origin (CKDu) resulting in progressive deterioration of renal function causing end stage renal failure that cannot be linked to a known causative factor are reported from different regions of the world including areas of Sri Lanka, India and Central America [1, 2, 3]. CKDu in Sri Lanka and Mesoamerican nephropathy demonstrate clinicopathological similarities and are also referred to as Chronic Interstitial Nephritis in Agricultural Communities (CINAC) [4]. Though exact etiology has not been confirmed yet, multiple factors such as exposure to environmental toxins, heavy metals, heat stress, and genetic susceptibility are assumed to be responsible for origin of the disease [5].

Renal insult leading to CKDu may start on a very early age, specially due to exposure to environmental toxins [6]. However, in countries where CKDu is a major public health issue, the focus is mainly on adult age groups. In Sri Lanka, a country with a heavy burden of CKDu, neither the screening programmes nor the studies pay attention on children and possibility of early renal damage. Nevertheless, young patients have been reported in some studies from Sri Lanka. For an example, 2 (7.7%) out of 26 less than 20 years old individuals participating in a screening programme in Madawachiya (Anuradhapura district, Sri Lanka) were reported to have stage 3-5 CKD (GFR less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m2) [7]. According to a hospital based study, 11.2% CKDu patients treated at the tertiary care center of Anuradhapura district were between 15 to 30 years of age [8]. CKDu has been reported in 10-15 years old children in North Central Province (NCP) as well [9]. Significance of these findings on describing epidemiology of CKDu in young population is limited by small number of younger participants and need for different Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation methods for children.

Screening children for renal problems is predominantly done using urinalysis due to none-invasive nature of the test. It has been used in several countries across the world with varying success in identifying and preventing permanent renal diseases [10]. School based urinalysis programmes, specially in Asian countries such as Japan and Korea have shown success in reducing the progress to end stage renal disease through early identification of asymptomatic renal diseases [11, 12].

Urine albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) in a spot sample is an early marker of kidney injury [13, 14]. Further, the presence of proteinuria has also been described as a risk factor for rapid progression and poorer prognosis of CKD [15, 16]. We hypothesized that studying distribution and factors associated with elevated UACR among children living in a CKDu endemic area may provide important clues about the onset and progression of the disease. We report here the first Sri Lankan study on renal functions of children in the province with the highest burden of CKDu.

Methods

Study design

This is a part of a large school based cross sectional study conducted among rural primary school children in North Central Province (NCP). Detailed methodology of the larger study has been described elsewhere [17].

Study setting

The study was carried out in Anuradhapura and Polonnaruwa districts of the NCP, in the dry zone of Sri Lanka. Estimated population of Anuradhapura and Polonnaruwa districts were 893,000 and 419,000 respectively in 2015 [18]. Majority of the population engage in paddy cultivation [19]. According to ministry of health, approximately 1000 and 500 CKD/CKDu patients has been reported annually from Anuradhapura and Polonnaruwa districts between 2011 to 2015 [20].

Data collection was carried out in October to December 2014.

Study population

School children studying in grade 1 to 5 (aging 5 to 11 years) attending very difficult and difficult schools (classified according to number of students, accessibility and facilities available at the school) in NCP were the study population for the present study.

Study sample

The sampling frame for the original study included 701 rural primary schools in the province and 100 schools were selected using a multi stage cluster sampling. From each school, 50 students in 5 to 11 years age group were enrolled randomly.

From the original sample, 2880 children from 67 schools from five educational zones representing both Anuradhapura and Polonnaruwa districts were selected for the present study. From this, children attending 42 schools from Polonnaruwa district were selected for eGFR analysis. It included all the children with elevated UACR (> 30 mg/g) in Polonnaruwa and an age matched sample of children with UACR less than 30 mg/g.

Variables

We used district, sex, age, ethnicity, family history of kidney disease, history of having a chronic disease, drinking water source, BMI for age (z value) and hemoglobin concentration as predictor variables.

Several methods are available to estimate urine albumin excretion. Urine albumin excretion in a 24-h urine collection is considered the best bust is difficult to be assessed specially in children. Albumin and albumin to creatinine ratio in a random spot urine sample are more convenient methods that are used [21].

National Kidney Foundation (NKF) reference ranges for UACR was used to classify urine albumin excretion (UACR< 30 mg/g – normal, 30-300 mg/g –moderately increased, > 300 mg/g – severely increased [21].

Serum creatinine (SCr) was assessed using IDMS traceable modified Jaffe method. GFR was calculated using the beside Schwartz formula (eGFR = kL/SCr, k = 0.413). Though early stages of CKD may have GFR levels below 90 mg/dl/1.73m2, GFR < 60 mg/dl/1.73 m2 was used as the cutoff for low GFR [16].

The WHO cutoff upper limit of the reference range (11.5 g/dl) was used to define anemia [22].

Data sources/measurement

A self-administered questionnaire was sent to parents prior to the day of data collection. Trained medical graduates measured weight and height. A random spot urine sample was collected on the day of data collection. Trained nurses drew blood samples. Investigation reports were obtained from a commercial diagnostic laboratory with external quality control methods.

Data analysis

Urine albumin and UACR showed skewed distribution hence we used Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskel Wallis test. Since data was skewed we performed a standard multiple linear regression using log transformed UACR as the dependent variable. District (Anuradhapura and Polonnaruwa), Sex (Male and Female), Ethnicity (Sinhalese or other), Family history of CKD (No, Yes), Drinking water source (from approved wells or filtered or bottled water or springs or from other sources including unapproved wells, water supply schemes, ponds, and tube wells), Hemoglobin (g/dl), BMI for age (z score) and age (in months) were entered as dependent variables. Beta coefficients were exponentiated to interpret the results. Correlation was tested between BMI for age (z value) and log transformed urine albumin and UACR.

We compared the mean eGFR value of UACR elevated group in Polonnaruwa with that of age matched controls with normal UACR using independent sample t test.

SPSS version 20 was used for data analysis. Diagrams were created using GraphPad Prism.

Results

Altogether, 2880 school children aging 5-10 years were included in the sample. Male to female ratio was almost 1:1. Majority (86.7%) were Sinhalese. Of 2880 children studied, 580 reported CKD among their parents/ grandparents (Table 1).
Table 1

Characteristics of the 2880 rural primary school children from North Central Province, Sri Lanka

 

N

%

District

 Anuradhapura

1014

35.2

 Polonnaruwa

1866

64.8

Education Division

 Anuradhapura

364

12.6

 Dibulagala

517

18.0

 Higurakgoda

818

28.4

 Kabathigollawa

650

22.6

 Polonnaruwa

531

18.4

Age category

 5 years

216

7.5

 6 years

677

23.5

 7 years

598

20.8

 8 years

606

21.0

 9 years

574

19.9

 10 years

209

7.3

Sex

 Female

1412

49.0

 Male

1453

50.5

Ethnicity

 Sinhalese

2298

86.7

 Moor/Malay

347

13.1

 Tamil

4

0.2

History of any chronic disease

 Yes

293

7.5

 No

3597

92.5

Family history of CKD

 No

3353

85.3

 Yes

580

14.7

Distributions of urine albumin, urine creatinine and UACR (Fig. 1) were skewed. The median values for urine albumin, creatinine and UACR were 7 mg (range 2-902), 71.5 g (range 9-289) and 12.6 mg/g (range 1-784) respectively (Table 2).
Fig. 1

Distribution of UACR among 2880 rural primary school children from North Central Province, Sri Lanka

Table 2

Distribution of urine albumin, urine creatinine, and urine albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) among 2880 rural primary school children from North Central Province, Sri Lanka

 

Median

Mean (95% CI)

SD

Maximum

Minimum

Urine albumin (mg)

6

12.4 (10.8-13.9)

42.8

902

2

Urine creatinine (g)

67

74.1(72.6-75.7)

41.3

289

9

UACR (mg/g)

10.3

18.3(16.7-19.9)

44.0

784

1

District, sex, ethnicity and having a history of chronic disease showed statistically significant difference in the mean ranks of UACR between the groups but the effect sizes were small in all of them [23] (See Table 3).
Table 3

Comparison of UACR (mg/g) between groups using Mann-Whitney U test for binary independent variables

  

Median

Z

p

Approximate effect size

District

Anuradhapura

10.74

−2.217

0.027

−0.04

Polonnaruwa

10.00

Sex

Males

9.43

−6.633

0.001

−0.12

Females

11.29

Ethnicity

Sinhala

10.64

−4.357

0.001

−0.09

Other

9.09

Family History of CKD

No

10.25

−0.833

0.405

−0.02

Yes

10.53

Chronic diseases

Yes

11.11

−2.047

0.041

−0.04

No

10.38

Anemia

No

10.11

−1.908

0.056

−0.04

Yes

11.04

Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to compare the median UACR values between categorical variables. None of the variables that were tested; age (in years) (Chi Square 10.787, p 0.056) drinking water source (Chi-Square 5.57, p 0.59), thinness (Chi-Square 7.0, p 0.14) wasting (Chi Square 2.38, p 0.31) and stunting (Chi-Square 0.69, p 0.71) revealed statistically significant difference in UACR between groups. There was no statistically significant correlation between the BMI for age and log converted urine albumin (Pearson r − 0.03, p 0.10) or log converted UACR (Pearson r − 0.03, p 0.13).

Standard multiple linear regression using log transformed UACR as the dependent variable showed that the model explain only 2.8% of the variance in the log of the UACR (p < 0.001). Sex, ethnicity, history of having a chronic disease and age make a unique contribution to the model. The exponentiated β values (done separately in Microsoft excel) showed that when all other variables stay the same, female sex leads to 1.14% increase in UACR while Sinhalese ethnicity leads to 0.95% increase in UACR and having a chronic disease leads to a 0.96% increase in UACR. For a month increase in age, UACR decreases by 0.96%. (Table 4).
Table 4

Results of the standard multiple linear regression using log UACR as the independent variable

Variable

N

exponentiated β

p

District (Anuradhapura)

2880

0.97

0.094

Sex (Male)

2865

1.14

0.000

Ethnicity (Sinhala)

2649

0.94

0.001

Family history of CKD (No)

2534

1.01

0.726

Drinking water source

2600

1.00

0.860

Hemoglobin (g/dl)

2880

1.01

0.787

BMI for age (z score)

2802

0.97

0.131

Age (in months)

2880

0.96

0.026

History of chronic disease (Yes)

2523

0.96

0.048

N number available for analysis, β Standardized Coefficient, p Significance of standardized coefficient

UACR was less than 30 mg/g among 2623 (91.3%) students while 8.2% (n = 236) had moderately elevated UACR. Only 15 (0.5%) had highly elevated UACR. Out of students with UACR more than 30 mg/g, 89.8% (n = 203) did not have a history of a chronic disease (Chi square 2.21, p = 0.091).

In the Polonnaruwa district, serum creatinine was done and eGFR was estimated for all children with elevated UACR (n = 141). Mean eGFR was 88.9 mg/dl/1.73 m2 (95% CI for mean 86.4- 91.3). Three (2.1%) had eGFR less than 60 mg/dl/1.73 m2 and another 74 (52.8%) were having eGFR 60-90 mg/dl/1.73 m2. All 3 students who had eGFR less than 60 mg/dl/1.73 m2 had moderately elevated UACR and only one of them had a history of chronic disease. To compare the eGFR among UACR elevated and normal groups we selected an age and district matched comparison group with normal ACR levels (n = 142). Mean eGFR in this sample was 93.7 mg/dl/1.73 m2 (95% CI 91.1- 96.3) and it was significantly higher than that of UACR elevated group (t 2.7, p 0.007). One of the children (0.7%) had eGFR less than 60 mg/dl/1.73 m2 and only 55 (44.4%) had eGFR within 60-90 mg/dl/1.73 m2 range (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Distribution of eGFR among UACR normal and elevated groups of rural primary school children in Polonnaruwa

Discussion

This is the largest study reported in scientific literature on renal functions of children living in CKDu endemic regions. In an area where CKDu is hyper endemic and considered the highest priority public health issue, we showed that 8.7% children are having elevated UACR. This seems to be higher compared to the prevalence reported in studies examining UACR in children of this age group from other countries. For an example prevalence of elevated UACR in 5-9 years old children from an Australian Aboriginal community where chronic kidney disease is highly prevalent was 5% [24]. Among 10 to 19 years old Korean children, microalbuminuria was reported as 3% [25]. According to a Japanese school based screening programme 2.5% had elevated UACR [26]. Another study in England reported that median UACR was 12.4, 5.9, 9.5, 8.0 mg/g among 6 to 11 years old white girls, white boys, black girls and black boys respectively [27]. Mean UACR was reported as 8.55 mg/g and 9.7 mg/g in 6 to 9 years old Spanish boys and girls respectively [28].

Albuminuria is a marker of different pathologies in both adults and children. Although upper limits for the reference range have not been specifically developed for children, it is considered similar to that of adults [21]. However, studies show that the association with adverse effects starts well below the recommended cutoff values [29, 30]. The normal level of albuminuria for young adults and children is considered to be 10 mg/g [16]. Microalbuminuria is associated with cardiovascular diseases and all-cause mortality in adults [16, 31] and metabolic syndrome and obesity in children [32]. Further, it is associated with renal injury in children due to variety of causes such as diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, structural renal diseases, urinary tract infections and sickle cell disease [25, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37]. Urine albumin excretion is also proposed as a marker of generalized endothelial damage [37].

We observed that majority of children having elevated UACR were not having known chronic diseases; renal or other. This may be due to undetected renal injury or generalized endothelial damage from an unknown cause in these children. Urine albumin excretion can be increased in situations such as exercise, dehydration and orthostatic proteinuria [38]. To overcome the problem, an early morning sample is recommended to assess the albuminuria [39, 40]. In our study, we collected a random spot urine sample. However, the data collection was performed during morning hours of the day, usually before the recess when children are most likely to go and play out in the sun. Though using a random spot urine sample rather than a first void sample or repeated urine testing can overestimate the prevalence of elevated UACR [10] it is important to further investigate this finding to make sure that these children are not a target of CKDu prevailing in this area. Specially with our finding of lower mean eGFR levels among those who are having elevated UACR levels, the higher prevalence cannot be totally attributed to use of random urine sample.

We also observed that the mean GFR is lower even among the UACR normal group when compared to previous studies done in Iranian (99.66 ml/min/1.73 m2) [41] and Korean (99.24 ml/min/1.73m2) children [42]. Prevalence of low GFR (< 60 ml/min/1.73m2) was 1.7% among poor Mexican children under 18 years of age [43] and 1.26% (N = 9) among Iranian children [41]. Though there are difference in formula used and slight changes in the age groups, abnormalities we observed in UACR, mean eGFR and prevalence of low eGFR in this study sample poses an important question to answer; whether the CKDu in this area is having very early onset.

UACR vary with age, gender and race in children which was observed in this sample as well [32]. Epidemiological studies show that female sex, agricultural communities, family history, geographical clustering and consumption of surface water are associated with CKDu [5, 44]. We did not find that UACR in children was significantly affected by positive family history or water source.

As previously mentioned, interpretation of finding of this study should be done within the limitations of methodology. First, the urinalysis was done using a spot urine sample. We did not exclude children with acute or chronic renal diseases from the study sample. However, weather each child is having any chronic disease (including renal) was recorded. Since the data was collected from children attending the school on day of data collection, children suffering severe acute illness would have been excluded. Further, we do not have enough data to confirm or exclude CKDu in children with lower eGFR values. In addition, it is generally recommended to look for proteinuria rather than UACR for children as the later may underestimate proteinuria due to non-albumin proteins in the urine [16].

We recommend using our findings as baseline data only. Future studies should be looking in to proteinuria rather than albuminuria and require properly planned early morning samples. Further, a repeat sample is essential for confirmation of proteinuria. Use of new biomarkers to identify early renal insult among children in CKDu endemic area is recommended to investigate this issue.

Conclusions

This study provides evidence to suggest that children in CKDu endemic regions are having an early renal damage. This observation needs to be investigated further in order to understand the worldwide epidemic of CKDu.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was commissioned as a part of school health programme conducted by Former National Nutrition Coordinator Dr. Lalith Chandradasa. We acknowledge all school children participated in this study and the staff of their schools.

Funding

First phase of this study was funded through a grant from Sri Lankan country office of World Health Organization. The study was partially supported through Rajarata University research grant RJT/RP&HDC/2014/ FMAS/R/06. The funding bodies did not intervene in any stage of the research process.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are not publicly available as it has other yet unpublished data. But they are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

ASB conceived and design the study, analyzed and interpreted data, obtained funds and contributed the manuscript writing. AGS involved in field work, data collection and management, initial analysis and wrote the first draft of manuscript. NNPGCR involved in designing the study, coordinated field work and data management and data processing. JCS and SSH provided inputs in design, obtaining funds and interpretation of data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Informed written consent was obtained from parents prior to data collection. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Ethics Review Committee of Faculty of Medicine and Allied Sciences, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.
    Lunyera J, Mohottige D, Isenburg MV, Jeuland M, Patel UD, Stanifer JW. CKD of uncertain etiology: a systematic review. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11:379–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Almaguer M, Herrera R, Orantes CM. Chronic kidney disease of unknown etiology in agricultural communities. MEDICC Rev. 2014;16:9–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gifford FJ, Gifford RM, Eddleston M, Dhaun N. Endemic nephropathy around the world. Kidney Int reports Elsevier. 2017;2:282–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jayasumana C, Orantes C, Herrera R, Almaguer M, Lopez L, Silva LC, et al. Chronic interstitial nephritis in agricultural communities: a worldwide epidemic with social, occupational and environmental determinants. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016;32:gfw346. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rajapakse S, Shivanthan MC, Selvarajah M. Chronic kidney disease of unknown etiology in Sri Lanka. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2016;22:259–64. Taylor & FrancisCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Orantes-Navarro CM, Herrera-Valdés R, Almaguer-López M, López-Marín L, Vela-Parada XF, Hernandez-Cuchillas M, et al. Toward a comprehensive hypothesis of chronic interstitial nephritis in agricultural communities. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2017;24:101–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Senevirathna L, Abeysekera T, Nanayakkara S, Chandrajith R, Ratnatunga N, Harada KH, et al. Risk factors associated with disease progression and mortality in chronic kidney disease of uncertain etiology: a cohort study in Medawachchiya, Sri Lanka. Environ Health Prev Med. 2012;17:191–8. SpringerCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Selvarajah M, Weeratunga P, Sivayoganthan S, Rathnatunga N, Rajapakse S. Clinicopathological correlates of chronic kidney disease of unknown etiology in Sri Lanka. Indian. J Nephrol. 2016;26:357.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jayasekara J, Dissanayake D, Adhikari S, Bandara P. Geographical distribution of chronic kidney disease of unknown origin in north central region of Sri Lanka. Ceylon Med J. 2013:58, 6–10. The Sri Lanka Medical AssociationGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hogg RJ. Screening for CKD in children: a global controversy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4:509–15. American Society of NephrologyCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Park Y-H, Choi J-Y, Chung H-S, Koo J-W, Kim S-Y, Namgoong M-K, et al. Hematuria and proteinuria in a mass school urine screening test. Pediatr Nephrol. 2005;20:1126–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Imai E, Yamagata K, Iseki K, Iso H, Horio M, Mkino H, et al. Kidney disease screening program in Japan: history, outcome, and perspectives. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2:1360–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Glassock RJ. Is the presence of microalbuminuria a relevant marker of kidney disease? Curr Hypertens Rep. 2010;12:364–8. SpringerCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Son MK, Yoo HY, Kwak BO, Park HW, Kim KS, Chung S, et al. Regression and progression of microalbuminuria in adolescents with childhood onset diabetes mellitus. Ann. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. Korean Society of Pediatric. Endocrinology. 2015;20:13–20.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wingen AM, Fabian-Bach C, Schaefer F, Mehls O. Randomised multicentre study of a low-protein diet on the progression of chronic renal failure in children. European study Group of Nutritional Treatment of chronic renal failure in childhood. Lancet (London, England). 1997;349:1117–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group. KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 2013;3:4–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Naotunna NPGCR, Dayarathna M, Maheshi H, Amarasinghe GS, Kithmini VS, Rathnayaka M, et al. Nutritional status among primary school children in rural Sri Lanka; a public health challenge for a country with high child health standards. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Registrar general department SL. Mid-year population estimates by district and sex 2013 - 2015 [Internet]. [cited 2017 Oct 19]. Available from: http://www.statistics.gov.lk/PopHouSat/VitalStatistics/MidYearPopulation/Mid-year population by district.pdf. Accessed 22 Dec 2017.
  19. 19.
    Samples Survey Division Department of Census, Department of Census and Statistics. Household income and expenditure survey 2012/13 final report Department of Census and Statistics Ministry of policy planning economic affairs, child youth and cultural affairs Sri Lanka. 2012.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    President Task Force for Chronic Kidney Disase [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2017 Oct 19]. Available from: http://www.presidentialtaskforce.gov.lk/en/kidney.html
  21. 21.
    ACR - The National Kidney Foundation [Internet]. [cited 2017 Mar 6]. Available from: https://www.kidney.org/kidneydisease/siemens_hcp_acr
  22. 22.
    WHO, Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Assessing the Iron status at the population level. 2nd ed: Geneva, World Health Organization; 2004. WHOGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New. New York: Routledge Academic; 1988.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hoy WE, Mathews JD, Mccredie DA, Pugsley DJ, Beverly HG, Rees M, et al. The multidimensional nature of renal disease: rates and associations of albuminuria in an Australian aboriginal community. Kidney Int. 1998;54:1296–304. ElsevierCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cho H, Kim JH. Prevalence of microalbuminuria and its associated cardiometabolic risk factors in Korean youth: Data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.​ PLoS One. 2017;12:e0178716.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pugia MJ, Lott JA, Kajima J, Saambe T, Sasaki M, Kuromoto K, et al. Screening school children for albuminuria, proteinuria and occult blood with dipsticks. Clin Chem Lab Med. 1999;37:149–57. Walter de GruyterCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Trachtenberg F, Barregård L. The effect of age, sex, and race on urinary markers of kidney damage in children. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007;50:938–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sanchez-Bayle M, Rodriguez-Cimadevilla C, Asensio C, Ruiz-Jarabo C, Baena J, Arnaiz P, et al. Urinary albumin excretion in Spanish children. Pediatr Nephrol. 1995;9:428–30. Springer-VerlagCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wachtell K, Ibsen H, Olsen MH, Borch-Johnsen K, Lindholm LH, Mogensen CE, et al. Albuminuria and cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy: the LIFE study. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:901–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hillege HL, Fidler V, Diercks GFH, van Gilst WH, de Zeeuw D, van Veldhuisen DJ, et al. Urinary albumin excretion predicts cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality in general population. Circulation. 2002;106:1777–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Xia F, Liu G, Shi Y, Zhang Y. Impact of microalbuminuria on incident coronary heart disease, cardiovascular and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:1–9. e-Century Publishing CorporationPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rademacher ER, Sinaiko AR. Albuminuria in children. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2009;18:246–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Aloni MN, Mabidi J-LL, Ngiyulu RM, Ekulu PM, Mbutiwi FI, Makulo JR, et al. Prevalence and determinants of microalbuminuria in children suffering from sickle cell anemia in steady state. Clin. Kidney J. 2017;10:479–86.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Becton LJ, Kalpatthi RV, Rackoff E, Disco D, Orak JK, Jackson SM, et al. Prevalence and clinical correlates of microalbuminuria in children with sickle cell disease. Pediatr Nephrol. 2010;25:1505–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kwak BO, Chung S, Kim KS. Microalbuminuria in children with urinary tract infection. Korean. J Pediatr. 2010;53:840.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sharp C, Johnson A, Gabow P. Factors relating to urinary protein excretion in children with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1998;9:1908–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Singh A, Satchell SC. Microalbuminuria: causes and implications. Pediatr Nephrol. 2011;26:1957–65. SpringerCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Vehaskari VM. Orthostatic proteinuria. Arch Dis Child. 1982;57:729–30. BMJ GroupCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hogg RJ, Portman RJ, Milliner D, Lemley KV, Eddy A, Ingelfinger J. Evaluation and management of proteinuria and nephrotic syndrome in children: recommendations from a pediatric nephrology panel established at the National Kidney Foundation conference on proteinuria, albuminuria, risk, assessment, detection, and elimination (PARADE). Pediatrics. 2000;105:1242–9. American Academy of PediatricsCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Witte EC, Lambers Heerspink HJ, de Zeeuw D, Bakker SJL, de Jong PE, Gansevoort R. First morning voids are more reliable than spot urine samples to assess microalbuminuria. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:436–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gheissari A, Kelishadi R, Roomizadeh P, Abedini A, Haghjooy-Javanmard S, Abtahi S-H, et al. Chronic kidney disease stages 3-5 in Iranian children: need for a school-based screening strategy: the CASPIAN-III study. Int J Prev Med. 2013;4:95–101. Medknow PublicationsPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kwak BO, Lee ST, Chung S, Kim KS. Microalbuminuria in normal Korean children. Yonsei Med J. 2011;52:476.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Koshy SM, Garcia-Garcia G, Pamplona JS, Renoirte-Lopez K, Perez-Cortes G, Gutierrez MLS, et al. Screening for kidney disease in children on world kidney day in Jalisco, Mexico. Pediatr Nephrol. 2009;24:1219–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wanigasuriya K. Update on uncertain etiology of chronic kidney disease in Sri Lanka’s north-central dry zone. MEDICC Rev. 2014;16:61–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. B. Agampodi
    • 1
  • G. S. Amarasinghe
    • 1
  • P. G. C. R. Naotunna
    • 1
  • C. S. Jayasumana
    • 2
  • S. H. Siribaddana
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Allied SciencesRajarata University of Sri LankaSaliyapuraSri Lanka
  2. 2.Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Allied SciencesRajarata University of Sri LankaSaliyapuraSri Lanka
  3. 3.Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Allied SciencesRajarata University of Sri LankaSaliyapuraSri Lanka

Personalised recommendations