Nanoscale Research Letters

, 11:250 | Cite as

Lattice Dynamics of the Rhenium and Technetium Dichalcogenides

Open Access
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. EMN Meeting


The rhenium and technetium dichalcogenides are layered van der Waals semiconductors which show a large number of Raman-active zone-centre phonon modes as a result of their unusually large unit cells and deviation from hexagonal symmetry. They thus offer the possibility of introducing in-plane anisotropy into composite heterostructures based on van der Waals materials, and Raman spectroscopy is generally used to determine their in-plane orientation. We show that first-principles calculations give a good description of the lattice dynamics of this family of materials and thus predict the zone-centre phonon frequencies and Raman activities of TcS2. We consider the distribution of the phonon modes in frequency and their atomic displacements and give a unified understanding of the phonon frequencies and Raman spectra of ReS2, TcS2 and ReSe2 in terms of the scaling of Raman frequency with the chalcogen mass.


Rhenium sulphide Technetium sulphide Rhenium selenide Transition metal dichalcogenide Raman spectroscopy 


The transition metal dichalcogenides (TMD) have been known for a considerable time; the basic properties of about 40 members of the family were reviewed in 1969 [1]. However, the enormous fundamental scientific interest generated by the isolation of graphene, and the potentially disruptive technologies based on it, has stimulated interest in the wider family of two-dimensional layered van der Waals materials, to which the TMDs belong, with some 2500 publications on the archetypal family member MoS2 alone in 2015. This level of activity is likely to be sustained as researchers develop the concept of devices based on multi-layered structures [2] in which dissimilar materials are stacked to achieve new functionalities, for instance, as light emitters [3, 4]. The key to this approach is the wide variety of behaviors that the TMDs exhibit, with metallic, semiconducting and superconducting phases, with properties that can be tuned by doping, and with novel types of coupling between spin and valley physics [5]. Here, we consider some of the less well-studied TMDs, based on Re and Tc, which are also attracting growing interest.

The rhenium and technetium dichalcogenides are layered van der Waals semiconductors with large unit cells due to their deviation from hexagonal symmetry towards a distorted 1T structure with space group P\(\bar {1}\) in which the metal atoms group into parallelograms of four atoms [6, 7, 8]. They thus offer the unusual possibility of introducing a built-in planar anisotropy into composite heterostructures. Clearly, if their anisotropy is to be useful, one must be able to determine their in-plane orientation, and one promising method for this is Raman spectroscopy [9] since the large unit cell and lack of symmetry-related degeneracies leads to a large number (18) of Raman-active zone-centre phonon modes [9, 10].

It has already been shown that first-principles calculations can give a good description of the lattice dynamics of this family of materials [9, 10]; here, we compare predictions of the phonon frequencies of ReS2, TcS2 and ReSe2. The zone-centre phonon modes show a common distribution in frequency, and we give a simple interpretation of this in terms of the atomic displacements, which leads to a unified understanding of the Raman spectra of ReS2, TcS2 and ReSe2.

Little is known directly about crystalline TcS2 though its structure is known [6, 8] and its electronic band structure has been predicted via density functional theory [11, 12, 13]. Technetium is not found naturally on Earth but only occurs as a by-product of nuclear fission of uranium-235; all its isotopes are unstable. The most readily available isotope, 99m Tc, is used in nuclear medicine as a radiopharmaceutical for labeling applications and is highly radioactive with a half-life of ∼6 h. In that context, it is sometimes produced in the form of a colloid with rhenium sulphide [14]. A longer-lived isotope is 99Tc (half-life 2.13 × 105 years), and the planning of long-term control and storage for this radionuclide in a water-insoluble form is a priority. One proposed strategy involves sequestration of 99Tc by the formation of its sulphides [15]. For both these applications, a knowledge of the Raman spectrum of TcS2 should provide a useful analytic and diagnostic tool. We therefore also present a prediction of the Raman-active modes of TcS2 and show how these relate to those of the analogous rhenium compounds.


Raman spectra in a backscattering geometry were obtained for the rhenium dichalcogenides using a Renishaw InVia Raman microscope with a ×50 objective lens giving a laser spot size of around 1 μm with, typically, 100 μW of 532-nm excitation; this microscope also provided the images of the samples in Fig. 1. The preparation (by micro-mechanical cleavage) and characterization of the ReSe2 samples is described elsewhere [9], and the ReS2 sample was prepared similarly. The ReSe2 sample was a few unit cells in thickness whereas the ReS2 sample was thicker; the differences between monolayer, few-layer and bulk Raman spectra of these materials are small [9, 10], being much less significant than in the case of MoS2, for example, but have recently been shown to vary systematically with thickness, as do the interlayer modes [16, 17, 18, 19].
Fig. 1

The Raman spectra of thick a ReSe2 and b ReS2 flakes on a SiO2/silicon substrate at room temperature; the red arrows link the peaks in the two materials corresponding to three phonon modes of significance for the present discussion. The insets show the the sample flakes used; the circles show the areas sampled and the bars indicate a scale of 20 μm

Calculations of phonon frequencies were carried out using density functional perturbation theory [20] (DFPT) as implemented in the Quantum Espresso code [21]. Initial atomic coordinates were taken from earlier X-ray diffraction studies [7, 8] and were relaxed to reduce the atomic forces below 10−3 eV/Å. We have explored the use of norm-conserving pseudopotentials (NCPP) and also the projector augmented wave (PAW) method within both the local density (LDA) and generalized gradient (GGA) approximations; the resulting phonon frequencies given by these methods vary by less than ±2 % and are in good agreement with experiment, as found by other authors [10, 22]. The criteria for the convergence of the total energy with respect to kinetic energy cutoffs (here typically 680 eV) and k-point grid size (typically 6×6×6 for 3D or 6×6×1 for 2D) were discussed earlier [9]. Since the bulk unit cell of ReS2 may be doubled along the out-of-plane axis [8] (that is, the unit cell may contain two layers), we calculated the phonon modes for an isolated monolayer with a single layer per supercell, so as to obtain the same number of modes and thus facilitate comparison. Since the differences between the phonon modes of monolayers and multiple layers are small for a transition metal dichalcogenide [10, 23], this procedure is justified. We note also that this question is not resolved, and one group saw no evidence of doubling of the unit cell for ReS2 [24].

Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows representative spectra of ReSe2 and ReS2; most of the 18 expected Raman-active A g modes can be seen and, as has been described in detail before, the peak intensities are a function of the angle of orientation between the excitation laser polarization and the in-plane crystal axes [9, 18]. For these low-symmetry materials, all components of the Raman tensors for each A g mode are non-zero, so that all Raman-active modes have a finite intensity at any angle, but the maximum intensities of different modes occur at different angles. The modes are densely spaced in frequency, but for both materials there is a noticeable “gap” in the spectrum between the 9th and 10th modes as indicated by the red arrows in Fig. 1 (the higher red arrow links the positions of the highest-frequency Raman-active modes). This makes the two modes in either side of this gap easy to recognize even when weak; they are also found to be amongst the strongest modes in the Raman spectrum [25, 26, 27, 28], and so have been a focus of other studies, where they are sometimes labelled as E 2g -like and A 1g -like by analogy with MoS2 [10]; the E 2g -like modes are identified because they have significant in-plane displacements, which would twofold degenerate in hexagonal symmetry, and the modes that have displacements with components predominantly normal to the plane would be non-degenerate and are A 1g -like.

We focus on the two modes either side of the gap in the following. In Table 1, we give the frequencies of the Raman-active A g modes nearest to the gap limits (these are the 8th or 9th and 10th or 11th modes), and the highest frequency Raman-active mode (35th or 36th), and compare to our experimental values. The indices at which A u (IR) and A g (Raman) modes occur are not exactly the same for the set of materials or even for the same material with different choices of (for example) pseudopotential, because close-lying A u and A g modes can sometimes exchange positions in the sequence. Note that calculations of the phonon dispersion of ReS2 show that the gap is not a bandgap, in that it does not extend over the whole Brillouin zone [10], but it is an important and reproducible feature at the zone center. A recent calculation of the phonon dispersion of TcS2 used a 2×2×1 supercell, which yields a somewhat better accuracy in the phonon frequencies than the present approach but folds several modes into the range of the gap and so masks its existence in the zone-centre Raman modes [13].
Table 1

Calculated zone-centre phonon frequencies of gap-edge and highest Raman-active modes (cm −1)













8 or 9






10 or 11






highest A g






To summarize the DFPT predictions, we plot in Fig. 2 the calculated frequencies of the 33 zone-centre vibrational modes (18 A g and 15 A u ) in order of increasing frequency. The gap occurs in all three materials at the same position, between the 9th and 10th modes, emphasizing the strong similarity between these three compounds. The modes of the sulphides however cover a larger frequency range than those of the selenide, as one would expect based on the lower mass of sulphur (32.065) compared to selenium (78.96), and the frequencies of the Tc and Re sulphides are closely similar well above the gap but different near and below it. This suggests a simple classification of the modes into those in which the displacements of the metal atoms are significant (mainly below the gap) and those where it is predominantly the chalcogens that are moving (mainly above the gap). By considering the predicted atomic displacements for all modes, we can see that this classification is justified, though there are too many modes to show an exhaustive set of displacements here. As an example, we show in Fig. 3 one view of the predicted displacements for the two gap-edge modes (top and bottom rows, respectively). The displacements of the metal atoms are approximately in-plane and are significant for the lower-frequency mode (8 or 9) but smaller for the higher mode; however, for the higher mode (10 or 11), there are significant out-of-plane displacements of the chalcogen atoms. Similar patterns of phonon displacements were presented earlier for ReS2 [10] and, as Fig. 3 shows, the displacement patterns are broadly similar for all three compounds. Concentrating on the displacements of the chalcogen atoms, we can also see the in-plane character of mode 9 (E 2g -like) and the out-of-plane character of mode 10 (A 1g -like), in agreement with earlier work [10], and that this is valid also for TcS2.
Fig. 2

The calculated zone-centre phonon modes of ReS2 (black squares), ReSe2 (red circles) and TcS2 (green triangles) plotted in order of increasing frequency. All modes are either IR- or Raman-active. The vertical dotted line indicates the position in frequency of the gap in the phonon spectrum between modes 9 and 10. Note, modes 1–3 are zero-frequency rigid displacements of the unit cell and are not plotted

Fig. 3

The unit cell and phonon displacement vectors (red) for TcS2 (a, b), ReS2 (c, d) and ReSe2 (e, f). Top row: displacements for the highest frequency mode (mode 9) below the gap and bottom row: displacements for the lowest frequency mode above the gap (mode 10). S, yellow; Se, orange; Tc, turquoise; Re, blue

The similarity of the calculated displacements suggests that the interpretation above is reasonable. To test this further, we make the very simple assumption that, if interatomic “force constants” k are comparable, the frequencies of corresponding displacement patterns will scale with the square root of the mass m of the displaced atoms (\(\omega \propto \sqrt {k/m}\)). For the modes above the gap, this is the chalcogen mass, and therefore, we replot the calculated phonon frequencies in Fig. 4 (top panel) multiplied by \(\sqrt {32.065}=5.66\) (sulphides) and by \(\sqrt {78.96}=8.89\) (selenide). The effect of this scaling is dramatic; all three sets of phonon modes now almost coincide above the gap. We can also test the idea that the modes below the gap should scale with the square root of the reduced mass taking into account the metal ions (Fig. 4, bottom panel); the displacement patterns of Fig. 3 suggest that this will not be so successful, because both metal and chalcogen atoms are displaced significantly in the below gap modes. However, by comparison of Fig. 4 with Fig. 2, it is clear that the ReS2 and TcS2 modes 4–9 now lie closer together.
Fig. 4

The calculated zone-centre phonon modes of ReS2 (black squares), ReSe2 (red circles) and TcS2 (green triangles) plotted in order of increasing frequency and scaled as discussed. Top: scaled by the square root of the chlacogen mass; bottom: scaled by the square root of the transition metal mass

Finally, in Table 2, the calculated zone-centre phonon frequencies of TcS2 are given, since these have not been presented elsewhere. We also give the predicted infrared and Raman activities of these modes, principally to identify the Raman-active modes of the set; it should be noted that the Raman activity given here is the one computed in Quantum Espresso and other packages and represents a specific experimental geometry and an average over all possible sample orientations, as given in Eq. (6) of Porezag et al. [29]. So it does not correspond to the experimental configuration for a cleaved flake supported on a substrate; however, it would be relevant to the measurements on a polycrystalline or colloidal sample, the forms in which TcS2 is likely to be available.
Table 2

Calculated zone-centre phonon frequencies of TcS2


Frequency (cm −1)

IR Activity

Raman Activity


































































































































We have shown that a simple argument based on scaling by chalcogen mass allows one to understand the zone centre phonon modes of the rhenium and technetium dichalcogenides in a unified way and to understand qualitatively the distribution of the modes in frequency. This emphasizes the strong similarity between the members of this family of materials. The good agreement between the predicted and experimental frequencies of the Raman bands of the rhenium dichalcogenides gives us confidence in the behavior predicted for the technetium dichalcogenides, and this may be of use in monitoring the chemical composition of technetium-containing suspensions and colloids.



This work was supported by the Centre for Graphene Science of the Universities of Bath and Exeter, funded by the EPSRC (UK) under grants EP/G036101 and EP/M0022188; LH is supported by the Bath/Bristol Centre for Doctoral Training in Condensed Matter Physics, grant EP/L015544. Computational work was performed on the University of Bath’s High Performance Computing Facility. Data created during this research are freely available from the University of Bath data archive at DOI:10.15125/BATH-00130.


  1. 1.
    Wilson JA, Yoffe AD (1969) The transition metal dichalcogenides: discussion and interpretation of the observed optical, electrical and structural properties. Adv Phys 18(73): 193–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Geim AK, Grigorieva IV (2013) van der Waals heterostructures. Nature 499(7459): 419–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang X, Xia F (2015) van der Waals heterostructures: stacked 2D materials shed light. Nat Mater 14(3): 264–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Withers F, Del Pozo-Zamudio O, Schwarz S, Dufferwiel S, Walker PM, Godde T, Rooney AP, Gholinia A, Woods CR, Blake P, Haigh SJ, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Aleiner IL, Geim AK, Fal’ko VI, Tartakovskii AI, Novoselov KS (2015) WSe2 light-emitting tunneling transistors with enhanced brightness at room temperature. Nano Lett 15(12): 8223–8228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xiao D, Liu GB, Feng WX, Xu XD, Yao W (2012) Coupled spin and valley physics in monolayers of MoS2 and other group-VI dichalcogenides. Phys Rev Lett 108(19): 196802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wildervanck JC, Jellinek F (1971) The dichalcogenides of technetium and rhenium. J Less-Common Metals 24(1): 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Murray HH, Kelty SP, Chianelli RR, Day CS (1994) Structure of rhenium disulfide. Inorg Chem 33(19): 4418–4420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lamfers HJ, Meetsma A, Wiegers GA, deBoer JL (1996) The crystal structure of some rhenium and technetium dichalcogenides. J Alloys Compounds 241(1-2): 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wolverson D, Crampin S, Kazemi AS, Ilie A, Bending SJ (2014) Raman spectra of monolayer, few-layer, and bulk ReSe2: an anisotropic layered semiconductor. Acs Nano 8(11): 11154–11164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tongay S, Sahin H, Ko C, Luce A, Fan W, Liu K, Zhou J, Huang YS, Ho CH, Yan J, Ogletree DF, Aloni S, Ji J, Li S, Li J, Peeters FM, Wu J (2014) Monolayer behaviour in bulk ReS2 due to electronic and vibrational decoupling. Nat Commun 5: 3252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fang CM, Wiegers GA, Haas C, deGroot RA (1997) Electronic structures of ReS2, ReSe2 and Tcs2 in the real and the hypothetical undistorted structures. J Phys Condensed Matter 9(21): 4411–4424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weck PF, Kim E, Czerwinski KR (2013) Semiconducting layered technetium dichalcogenides: insights from first-principles. Dalton Trans 42(43): 15288–15295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jiao Y, Zhou L, Ma F, Gao G, Kou L, Bell JM, Sanvito S, Du A (2016) Predicting single-layer technetium dichalcogenides (TcX2, X= S, Se) with promising applications in photovoltaics and photocatalysis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(8): 5385–5392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koizumi M, Nomura E, Yamada Y, TakiguchiI T, Tanaka K, Yoshimoto M, Makita M, Sakamoto G, Kasumi F, Ogata E (2003) Sentinel node detection using 99mTc-rhenium sulphide colloid in breast cancer patients: evaluation of 1 day and 2 day protocols, and a dose-finding study. Nuclear Med Commun 24(6): 663–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fan D, Anitori RP, Tebo BM, Tratnyek PG, Lezama Pacheco JS, Kukkadapu RK, Engelhard MH, Bowden ME, Kovarik L, Arey BW (2013) Reductive sequestration of pertechnetate by nano zerovalent iron transformed by abiotic sulfide. Environ Sci Technol 47(10): 5302–5310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nagler P, Plechinger G, Schüller C, Korn T (2016) Observation of anisotropic interlayer raman modes in few-layer ReS2. physica status solidi (RRL)-Rapid Research Letters10(2): 185–189.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lorchat E, Froehlicher G, Berciaud S (2016) Splitting of interlayer shear modes and photon energy dependent anisotropic raman response in n-layer ReSe 2 and ReS2. ACS Nano 10(2): 2752–2760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chenet DA, Aslan OB, Huang PY, Fan C, van der Zande AM, Heinz TF, Hone JC (2015) In-plane anisotropy in mono- and few-layer ReS2 probed by Raman spectroscopy and scanning transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett 15(9): 5667–5672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    He R, Yan JA, Yin Z, Ye Z, Ye G, Cheng J, Li J, Lui CH (2016) Coupling and stacking order of ReS2 atomic layers revealed by ultralow-frequency raman spectroscopy. Nano Lett 16: 1404–1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Baroni S, de Gironcoli S, Dal Corso A, Giannozzi P (2001) Phonons and related crystal properties from density-functional perturbation theory. Rev Mod Phys 73: 515–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Giannozzi P, Baroni S, Bonini N, Calandra M, Car R, Cavazzoni C, Ceresoli D, Chiarotti GL, Cococcioni M, Dabo I, Corso AD, de Gironcoli S, Fabris S, Fratesi G, Gebauer R, Gerstmann U, Gougoussis C, Kokalj A, Lazzeri M, Martin-Samos L, Marzari N, Mauri F, Mazzarello R, Paolini S, Pasquarello A, Paulatto L, Sbraccia C, Scandolo S, Sclauzero G, Seitsonen AP, Smogunov A, Umari P, Wentzcovitch RM (2009) Quantum espresso: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J Phys Condens Matter 21(39): 395502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Feng Y, Zhou W, Wang Y, Zhou J, Liu E, Fu Y, Ni Z, Wu X, Yuan H, Miao F (2015) Raman vibrational spectra of bulk to monolayer ReS2 with lower symmetry]. Phys Rev B 92: 054110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhao H, Wu J, Zhong H, Guo Q, Wang X, Xia F, Yang L, Tan PH, Wang H (2015) Interlayer interactions in anisotropic atomically-thin rhenium diselenide. Nano Research 8(11): 3651–3661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ho CH, Huang YS, Liao PC, Tiong KK (1999) Crystal structure and band-edge transitions of ReS2-xSex layered compounds. J Phys Chem Solids 60(11): 1797–1804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yang S, Tongay S, Yue Q, Li Y, Li B, Lu F (2014) High-performance few-layer mo-doped ReSe2 nanosheet photodetectors. Sci Rep 4: 5442.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Taube A, Lapinska A, Judek J, Zdrojek M (2015) Temperature dependence of raman shifts in layered ReSe2 and SnSe2 semiconductor nanosheets. Appl Phys Lett 107(1): 13105–13105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yang S, Wang C, Sahin H, Chen H, Li Y, Li SS, Suslu A, Peeters FM, Liu Q, Li J, Tongay S (2015) Tuning the optical, magnetic, and electrical properties of ReSe2 by nanoscale strain engineering. Nano Lett 15(3): 1660–1666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Keyshar K, Gong Y, Ye G, Brunetto G, Zhou W, Cole DP, Hackenberg K, He Y, Machado L, Kabbani M, et al. (2015) Chemical vapor deposition of monolayer rhenium disulfide (ReS2). Adv Mater 31: 4640–4648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Porezag D, Pederson MR (1996) Infrared intensities and Raman-scattering activities within density-functional theory. Phys Rev B 54: 7830–7836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Wolverson and Hart. 2016

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of BathBathUK

Personalised recommendations