Conserved features of cohesin binding along fission yeast chromosomes
- 8k Downloads
Cohesin holds sister chromatids together to enable their accurate segregation in mitosis. How, and where, cohesin binds to chromosomes are still poorly understood, and recent genome-wide surveys have revealed an apparent disparity between its chromosomal association patterns in different organisms.
Here, we present the high-resolution analysis of cohesin localization along fission yeast chromosomes. This reveals that several determinants, thought specific for different organisms, come together to shape the overall distribution. Cohesin is detected at chromosomal loading sites, characterized by the cohesin loader Mis4/Ssl3, in regions of strong transcriptional activity. Cohesin also responds to transcription by downstream translocation and accumulation at convergent transcriptional terminators surrounding the loading sites. As cells enter mitosis, a fraction of cohesin leaves chromosomes in a cleavage-independent reaction, while a substantial pool of cohesin dissociates when it is cleaved at anaphase onset. We furthermore observe that centromeric cohesin spreads out onto chromosome arms during mitosis, dependent on Aurora B kinase activity, emphasizing the plasticity of cohesin behavior.
Our findings suggest that features that were thought to differentiate cohesin between organisms collectively define the overall behavior of fission yeast cohesin. Apparent differences between organisms might reflect an emphasis on different aspects, rather than different principles, of cohesin action.
KeywordsAdditional Data File tRNA Gene Fission Yeast Ribosomal Protein Gene Sister Chromatid Cohesion
green fluorescent protein
heterochromatin protein 1
open reading frame
- Pol II
RNA polymerase II
- Pol III
RNA polymerase III.
After DNA replication in S phase, sister chromatids are held together by the cohesin complex. This allows DNA break repair by homologous recombination in G2 and bipolar attachment of the spindle to sister kinetochores in mitosis. At anaphase onset, sister chromatid cohesion is resolved to trigger chromosome segregation (reviewed in [1, 2]). Cohesin is an essential, conserved protein complex consisting of at least four subunits, Psm1, Psm3, Rad21 and Psc3 in fission yeast, as well as a less firmly associated fifth subunit, Pds5 (orthologs of budding yeast Smc1, Smc3, Scc1, Scc3 and Pds5, respectively) [3, 4]. Biochemical studies and electron micrographs have shown that cohesin forms large proteinaceous rings. Together with strong experimental evidence, this has fostered the idea that cohesin binds to and holds sister chromatids together by topological embrace .
Several studies have investigated cohesin's chromosomal binding sites in different model organisms. Despite its conserved function in DNA repair and mitosis, no common rule has emerged that defines these sites. In budding yeast, cohesin appears to be excluded from transcribed open reading frames (ORFs) and accumulates almost exclusively at convergent RNA polymerase II (Pol II) transcriptional termination sites (called 'convergent sites' in the following) [6, 7, 8]. In contrast, in mammalian cells cohesin colocalizes along chromosomes with CTCF, a DNA-binding zinc-finger protein required for transcriptional insulation, with no strong preference with respect to ORF location or orientation [9, 10]. The functional interaction with CTCF has highlighted an additional conserved, but poorly understood, role of cohesin in transcriptional regulation [11, 12, 13]. Although CTCF is conserved in the fruit fly, cohesin exhibits yet a different binding pattern in this organism, associating with highly transcribed genes throughout the non-repetitive genome [13, 14].
A preliminary analysis in fission yeast found cohesin enriched at convergent sites , although closer examination of the pattern, which we report here, reveals further determinants of binding. In addition, the fission yeast heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) ortholog, Swi6, acts to enrich cohesin at centromeres and telomeres [15, 16]. Swi6 interacts with cohesin, and it has been suggested that it is also involved in cohesin recruitment to convergent sites along chromosome arms . A possible contribution of heterochromatin to human centromeric cohesin enrichment has remained controversial [18, 19]. In particular, it is unclear how heterochromatin could maintain centromeric cohesin during mitosis, when HP1 dissociates from chromatin after aurora B kinase-dependent phosphorylation of histone H3 [20, 21].
Little is known about the Mis4/Ssl3 cohesin loader (orthologs of budding yeast Scc2/Scc4), a protein complex that is required for cohesin's association with chromosomes [3, 22, 23]. How the cohesin loader recognizes its binding sites on chromosomes, and how it promotes cohesin loading at these sites, are poorly understood. In budding yeast, Scc2/Scc4 binding correlates with high transcriptional activity along chromosome 6 , and a recent genome-wide survey found tRNA genes, other RNA polymerase III (Pol III) transcribed genes, and Pol II-transcribed genes encoding ribosomal protein components among its binding sites . While budding yeast cohesin appears to translocate away from these loading sites to accumulate at convergent sites , Drosophila cohesin has been found to largely colocalize with the Scc2 ortholog Nipped-B . In Xenopus oocyte extracts, binding of the Scc2/Scc4 cohesin loader to transcriptionally silent chromosomes depends on the pre-replicative complex involved in initiation of DNA replication [25, 26]. The localization of Scc2/Scc4 in transcriptionally active somatic cells has not yet been studied. Mutations in human Scc2 are the cause of Cornelia de Lange syndrome, a severe developmental disorder, which has been taken to suggest a contribution of the Scc2/Scc4 complex, in conjunction with cohesin, to transcriptional regulation .
Chromosome segregation at anaphase onset is triggered when the protease separase is activated to cleave cohesin's Rad21 subunit [3, 28, 29]. In higher eukaryotes, but not in budding yeast, a significant fraction of cohesin is already released from chromosome arms as chromosomes condense in prophase. This prophase pathway of cohesin removal is independent of separase, but depends on cohesin phosphorylation by Polo-like kinase and on the cohesin destabilizer Wapl [29, 30]. The regulation of mitotic cohesin removal in fission yeast remains poorly characterized. Only a small fraction of cohesin is thought to be cleaved at anaphase onset, but whether and where cohesin is removed from chromosome arms during prophase is not known. A cytological study found that cohesin remains chromosome-bound throughout mitosis .
Here we have analyzed the localization of fission yeast cohesin and its loader throughout the mitotic cell cycle using chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by hybridization to high density oligonucleotide tiling arrays. We find that cohesin is enriched at convergent sites but, unlike in budding yeast, only approximately half of all convergent sites are bound by cohesin. In addition, we find cohesin away from convergent sites, coinciding with its Mis4/Ssl3 loading complex at tRNA genes, ribosomal protein genes and additional strongly transcribed genes. As cells enter mitosis, a small fraction of cohesin is released from chromosomes in a cleavage-independent reaction, while a substantial fraction dissociates from chromosomes as it is cleaved at anaphase onset. Detectable amounts of cohesin remain associated with chromosomes during anaphase, suggesting that not all of cohesin participates in sister chromatid cohesion. We find that as centromeric Swi6 dissociates from chromosomes in mitosis, cohesin spreads from centromeres onto neighboring sequences. Our findings suggest that features that were thought to differentiate cohesin behavior between organisms collectively define the overall behavior of fission yeast cohesin. Apparent differences between organisms could reflect an emphasis on different aspects, rather than different principles, of cohesin behavior.
Cohesin binding to an ordered subset of convergent sites along chromosome arms
Sister chromatid cohesion along chromosome arms facilitates DNA break repair by homologous recombination . While it has not been addressed whether proximity to a cohesin binding site affects the efficiency of DNA repair, it is assumed that sister chromatid cohesion at frequent intervals maintains contact between sister chromatids. The mean distance between cohesin binding sites along chromosome 2 was 13.1 kb, the median 16.5 kb. To address whether an organizing principle underlies the distribution of cohesin peaks among the convergent sites, we used a bootstrapping approach to randomize the distribution of 228 peaks among all available convergent sites (Figure S2 in Additional data file 1). The average median distance between cohesin peaks in 10,000 random distributions was 14.5 kb, somewhat closer than the observed median distance. In contrast, the greatest distance between two neighboring binding sites in random distributions ranged from 64.9 and 230.4 kb, on average 104.6 kb, almost twice the actual greatest observed distance between convergent site peaks of 60.9 kb. This suggests that a mechanism exists that ensures even distribution of cohesin binding among convergent sites (p < 0.0001).
We also analyzed whether the orientation of ORFs along chromosomes, which defines the pattern of convergent sites, was ordered in any way. A previous analysis in budding yeast found a pattern of ORF orientations close to a random distribution, in which any ORF is equally likely to be followed by an ORF pointing in the same or opposite direction . Along the three fission yeast chromosomes, ORFs are significantly more likely to be followed by an ORF in the opposite (54.13%) than in the same direction (45.87%, χ2-test, p = 3 × 10-9). Consequently, in addition to the non-random distribution of cohesin peaks among the convergent sites, a larger and more frequent number of convergent sites exists along fission yeast chromosomes than expected by chance.
Gene arrangement and expression, but not Swi6, contribute to defining cohesin's pattern among convergent sites
We next tested whether the transcriptional strength of convergent gene pairs generally correlated with cohesin binding. As an indicator for transcriptional activity, we compared the transcript abundance measured under growth conditions similar to those used in our experiments . This revealed that convergent genes surrounding cohesin binding sites are more strongly transcribed than those lacking cohesin (2,325.5 versus 1,848.0 median relative mRNA levels of genes flanking cohesin-bound and cohesin-free convergent sites, respectively, p = 0.011; Figure S3 in Additional data file 1). In addition, we noticed that convergent sites with gene runs of more than one ORF in each direction were more likely to be bound by cohesin. We grouped convergent sites along chromosome 2 in two classes, class 1 containing all convergent sites where from one or both sides only one gene terminates (n = 412), and class 2 containing the remaining sites with at least two convergent genes on both sides (n = 96; Figure 2b). While 74% of class 2 convergent sites were bound by cohesin, only 46% of class 1 were. This suggests that in addition to the strength of transcription, the number of genes that point towards a convergent site influences the chance of cohesin binding.
It has been suggested that transcriptional readthrough at convergent sites promotes double stranded RNA-dependent heterochromatin formation, which in turn underlies cohesin recruitment . We therefore tested whether the heterochromatin protein Swi6, thought to recruit cohesin, played a role in generating the observed cohesin pattern. We grew wild-type and swi6Δ cells in synthetic medium lacking thiamine, conditions under which the nmt2 gene is transcribed at the nmt2/avn2 convergent site that has been studied as an example. In contrast to the prediction, the cohesin pattern along chromosome arms, including the nmt2/avn2 convergent site, remained unchanged in swi6Δ cells (Figure 2c, right). We detected only small amounts of cohesin at the nmt2/avn2 convergent site, a class 1 convergent site following the above classification. At the centromeric repeats, cohesin levels were reduced in the absence of Swi6 (Figure 2c, left). These findings are consistent with previous reports implicating Swi6 in cohesin recruitment to centromeric heterochromatin, but not chromosome arms [15, 16].
We also compared the observed cohesin pattern during the mitotic cell cycle with that during meiosis, when the Rad21 subunit is largely replaced by its meiotic paralog Rec8 . Figure 2d shows that during meiosis, cohesin appears to be more uniformly distributed among convergent sites; 346 (68%) of all convergent sites along chromosome 2 were cohesin-bound in meiosis, compared to 262 (52%) during mitosis. This difference could stem in part from an altered transcriptional profile during meiosis, or could be the consequence of a distinct chromosome architecture during meiotic prophase - for example, a specific requirement of cohesin for homolog pairing or recombination.
The Mis4/Ssl3 cohesin loader coincides with highly transcribed genes
Mis4/Ssl3 binding sites at tRNA genes overlapped with the binding profile of the Pol III transcription factor TFIIIC subunit Sfc6, while at ribosomal protein genes it colocalized with the forkhead domain containing protein Fhl1 (Figure 3a). Fhl1 is a possible fission yeast ortholog of the transcription factor Fhl1 that controls ribosomal protein gene expression in budding yeast . We found Sfc6 also associated with ribosomal protein genes, and Fhl1 with tRNA genes, though with weaker signal intensities (Figure 3a). We do not currently know whether Sfc6 contributes to transcriptional control of ribosomal protein genes, and Fhl1 to that of tRNA genes, or whether the weaker levels of association may reflect indirect association, mediated by interactions between ribosomal protein and tRNA gene loci. Similar to budding yeast, Mis4/Ssl3 binding sites are also binding sites for the chromosomal condensin complex, which may mediate such interactions (Figure 3a) [24, 36].
To analyze the localization patterns of the above proteins using a complementary technique, we performed immunostaining of spread chromosomes. The staining patterns obtained were consistent with colocalization of Mis4 with Ssl3, condensin, the TFIIIC subunit Sfc3 and Fhl1, and confirmed a largely distinct localization of Mis4 and cohesin (Figure 3b).
tRNA and ribosomal protein genes are strongly transcribed by Pol III and Pol II, respectively. Together, these loci account for approximately half of the detected Mis4/Ssl3 binding sites. We therefore tested whether Mis4/Ssl3 binding sites were generally characterized by high expression levels. The median mRNA level of genes bound by Mis4/Ssl3, excluding tRNA genes, was almost twice the median of all unbound genes (2,918 versus 1,559, p < 10-12, Wilcoxon signed ranks test; genes with expression level '0' were excluded from the analysis; Figure S6 in Additional data file 1). When the strongly transcribed ribosomal protein genes were excluded from the analysis, the remaining Mis4/Ssl3 bound genes still showed significantly higher expression than the unbound genes (median mRNA level 2,331, p < 10-5). However, not all highly expressed genes are Mis4/Ssl3 binding sites; 389 genes along chromosome 2 showed mRNA levels greater than the median of all Mis4/Ssl3-bound genes, yet are not associated with the cohesin loader. This indicates that Mis4/Ssl3 associates with highly expressed genes, but that a high level of transcription is not a sufficient determinant for binding. Rather, certain groups of highly transcribed genes may contain features - for example, promoter elements or associated transcription factors - that form a cohesin loading site.
The relationship between cohesin and its loading sites
We next asked whether the distribution of loading sites also influences the cohesin pattern among convergent sites. We therefore compared the distances of convergent sites that were bound by cohesin, or not, from their respective nearest Mis4/Ssl3 binding sites. The median distance of cohesin-bound convergent sites to the nearest Mis4/Ssl3 site was 3.9 kb, significantly less than convergent sites that were free of cohesin (7.4 kb, p = 0.033; Figure 4b). This suggests that the loading site distribution contributes to defining the cohesin pattern along chromosomes arms.
If Mis4/Ssl3 association sites promote cohesin binding in their surroundings, deletion of a loading site should alter the cohesin pattern. To test this, we deleted a 489 bp sequence containing two adjacent tRNA genes that form a Mis4/Ssl3 and cohesin binding site on the left arm of chromosome 2 (Figure 4a). In response to the deletion, Mis4/Ssl3 binding to this locus disappeared. Cohesin was also no longer detected at this site, consistent with the notion that cohesin loading had been disrupted. However, the cohesin distribution at convergent sites in the vicinity of the former loading site remained unchanged. This suggests that establishment of the overall cohesin pattern in the surroundings did not depend on this specific Mis4/Ssl3 binding site. Despite the tRNA deletion, residual Mis4/Ssl3 remained detectable in the vicinity (Figure 4a). Cohesin loading by Mis4/Ssl3 might therefore be less restricted to its peaks of binding than the pattern suggests. Alternatively, other determinants - for example, gene orientation and transcriptional activity - might define cohesin distribution at this locus.
Prophase removal and cohesin cleavage during mitosis
In order to follow cohesin through mitosis, we arrested a cell population in G2 using the thermosensitive cdc25-22 mutation and released the culture into synchronous mitotic progression at permissive temperature. As cells entered mitosis (10 minutes), we again detected increased cohesin levels in the soluble fraction, consistent with removal of a small cohesin pool during prophase (Figure 5b). At the time of anaphase (20-30 minutes), Rad21 cleavage products became detectable and chromosomal cohesin levels dropped by about half. As the carboxy-terminal Rad21 cleavage fragments are expected to be rapidly turned over by the N-end rule pathway , it is hard to estimate the total amount of cohesin cleaved during anaphase. Considering the amount of cohesin loss at this time, we estimate that up to half of the cohesin might be cleaved. The appearance of the cleavage product mainly in the soluble fraction is consistent with the idea that cohesin dissociates from chromosomes after cleavage. The loss of cohesin from chromosomes during anaphase could also be visualized by immunostaining of cohesin on spread chromosomes. Cells in anaphase displayed a distinctly reduced cohesin signal, consistent with its removal from chromosomes (Figure 5c). A lower level of cohesin remained visible even on anaphase chromosomes, confirming that a subpool of cohesin is not removed from chromosomes during anaphase and, therefore, may not have participated in sister chromatid cohesion.
Reciprocal regulation of Mis4/Ssl3 and condensin during mitosis
Because of the colocalization of Mis4/Ssl3 with condensin, and the role of the budding yeast cohesin loader in mitotic chromosome condensation , we analyzed the binding pattern of fission yeast condensin with chromosomes during mitosis. As fission yeast cells enter mitosis, condensin accumulates in the nucleus due to mitotic phosphorylation of its Cut3 subunit . In G2 cells, a small but significant fraction of condensin fractionated with the chromosome-bound material. This fraction increased during mitosis when approximately half of cellular condensin was chromosome-bound (Figure 6b). The increase of chromosomal condensin in mitosis could also be clearly seen on immunostained spread chromosomes (Figure 6c). This suggests that as cells enter mitosis, Mis4/Ssl3 is retained on chromosomes while levels of condensin increase.
Spreading of centromeric cohesin onto chromosome arms during mitosis
We next investigated whether cohesin removal in mitosis affected certain regions of the chromosome more than others. We therefore followed the cohesin binding pattern in cells synchronously progressing through mitosis by chromatin immunoprecipitation. The cohesin pattern remained largely unchanged throughout G2, metaphase and anaphase, although the height of peaks along chromosome arms decreased (Figure S7 in Additional data file 1). This suggests that cohesin is not removed from a subset of its binding sites during mitosis, but that its association among most binding sites was uniformly reduced.
Cohesin is an essential chromosomal protein complex with ubiquitous roles in chromosome segregation, DNA repair and transcriptional regulation. Despite its conserved function, recent studies have revealed striking apparent disparities between its chromosomal association patterns in different organisms. Our analysis of cohesin localization along fission yeast chromosomes has contributed to reconciling different aspects of cohesin behavior on chromosomes and suggests that differences between organisms may reflect an emphasis on individual aspects of cohesin behavior rather than different principles of action.
Cohesin loading onto chromosomes starts in a reaction catalyzed by the Mis4/Ssl3 (Scc2/Scc4; Nipped-B) complex. How the Mis4/Ssl3 complex is recruited to chromosomes is still largely unknown, but in budding yeast and Drosophila its binding sites correlate with strongly expressed genes [7, 14, 24]. We find that the same is true in fission yeast, although strong transcription by itself is not sufficient to create a Mis4/Ssl3 binding site. Rather, certain features of a subset of strongly transcribed genes might make them cohesin loading sites, the nature of which remains to be elucidated. In Drosophila, the chromosomal association pattern of the cohesin complex largely overlaps with that of its loading factor . In contrast, budding yeast cohesin is thought to translocate away from its loading sites to accumulate in regions of convergent transcriptional termination . In fission yeast, we see evidence for both retention of cohesin at a subset of its loading sites as well as translocation to convergent sites. This opens the possibility that cohesin associates with chromosomes in the same way in these organisms, with more or less pronounced retention at its loading sites. While no evidence for cohesin translocation to convergent sites has been obtained along Drosophila chromosomes, we cannot exclude that a similar process takes place. Intergenic regions at convergent sites are larger in higher eukaryotes, as compared to the yeasts, so that cohesin in these regions may not form peaks of association that can be easily detected. We do not yet know the location of human Scc2/Scc4 along chromosomes, and whether cohesin's peaks of association at CTCF binding sites are indicative of its loading sites or of locations distinct from the loader. Apparently normal total levels of cohesin on chromosomes in the absence of CTCF suggest that CTCF might act as a cohesin anchor, as exemplified by fission yeast Swi6, rather than a loading factor .
Cohesin fulfils roles both in sister chromatid cohesion as well as transcriptional regulation. It is possible that cohesin's function at its loading sites, and at distant convergent sites, differs. Cohesin at its loading site may maintain a more dynamic state of binding, conducive for promoting reversible interactions between gene regulatory regions. tRNA genes, which we identified as cohesin loading sites in budding and fission yeast, are known transcriptional insulators . The Drosophila cohesin loader Nipped-B together with cohesin also regulate transcriptional insulation , and the identification of cohesin as a component of human CTCF insulators suggests that this aspect of cohesin function is conserved [9, 10]. At convergent sites, distant from the loading sites, cohesin may reach a more stable mode of interaction required for enduring sister chromatid cohesion.
The distribution of cohesin binding sites along fission yeast chromosome arms is not random and shows signs of an ordered arrangement. Only about half of all convergent sites are bound by cohesin, and these are spaced such that large gaps between binding sites are avoided. This appears to be achieved not by a single mechanism, but by a number of factors, including gene arrangement, transcription levels and proximity to a loading site. Of note, the gene arrangement along fission yeast chromosomes favors alterations in gene orientation at the expense of parallel gene runs. As a consequence, the fission yeast genome contains 107 more convergent sites as possible cohesin binding sites than expected by chance. We do not know whether the benefit of regularly spaced cohesin along chromosome arms contributed to the selection of this non-random gene order. Non-randomness of the gene orientation is less pronounced in budding yeast . In this organism, virtually all convergent sites are cohesin-bound, thus reducing the possible impact of parallel gene runs. The higher frequency of cohesin binding sites in budding yeast could be the consequence of a larger number of loading sites. In comparison to 274 tRNA genes in budding yeast, the fission yeast genome contains only 196 tRNA genes, many of which are clustered close to centromeres.
As cells enter mitosis, a small fraction of cohesin is released from chromosomes in an apparently cleavage-independent reaction. This could be related to the prophase pathway of cohesin removal that is observed in higher eukaryotes [29, 30]. At anaphase onset, a larger proportion of cohesin is lost from chromosomes as cohesin is cleaved. The distribution of the remaining chromosomal cohesin stays largely unchanged along chromosome arms. This suggests that cohesin removal in prophase and anaphase does not affect specific cohesin locations, but uniformly acts on all chromosome arm-bound cohesin. A substantial part of cohesin remains associated with chromosomes throughout mitosis, which is therefore unlikely to be involved in sister chromatid cohesion. It could be that this pool of cohesin associated with chromosomes during G2, which in fission yeast takes up a large part of the cell cycle, and therefore did not participate in the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion during S phase. This pool may promote cohesin functions outside of sister chromatid cohesion - for example, transcriptional regulation - which may continue throughout mitosis. Whether and how separase is able to discriminate during cohesin cleavage between molecules that are, or are not, involved in sister chromatid cohesion are not known. The recent identification of Smc3 acetylation as a cohesin modification that promotes sister chromatid cohesion opens the possibility for such a distinction [44, 45]. Cohesin that persists on chromosomes during mitosis may then participate in cohesion establishment in the subsequent S phase, thus supplementing new cohesin loading during the short fission yeast G1 phase.
At centromeres, we observed that cohesin spreads out onto chromosome arms during mitosis. This could be because Swi6-dependent anchoring at the outer centromeric repeats is lost at this time. Initial cohesin tethering to the outer centromeric repeats ensures persisting cohesin enrichment around the centromere, which forms the basis for bi-orientation of sister chromatids on the mitotic spindle [15, 16]. Release from this tether in mitosis may, in turn, facilitate the dynamic centromere breathing behavior that is part of the bi-orientation process . Whether the enrichment of the cohesin loader Mis4/Ssl3 at core centromeric sequences plays a role in mitotic cohesin behavior remains to be investigated. These considerations suggest a possible explanation for the phenotype of mammalian cells lacking centromeric heterochromatin [18, 19]. Cohesin is still found enriched at centromeres, suggesting that cohesin loading occurs independently of heterochromatin. Nevertheless, centromere cohesion may be compromised because cohesin anchoring to its underlying DNA sequences is lost, resulting in the observed reduction of the centromeric constriction. A fuller understanding of cohesin behavior at higher eukaryotic centromeres will have to await identification of the DNA sequences that it associates with.
Using high resolution chromosome-wide analysis of the localization of fission yeast cohesin and its loading factor, we describe previously unappreciated principles of eukaryotic chromosome organization. Transcriptional features along chromosomes describe both the loading sites as well as determinants of the final pattern of cohesin localization. Our analysis goes towards reconciling distinct characteristics of cohesin binding in different model organisms. Cohesin is retained at a subset of its loading sites, with the potential of contributing to transcriptional insulation, while also responding to active transcription by accumulation at convergent sites. The behavior of fission yeast cohesin during mitosis underscores the existence of cohesin subpools with different dynamic properties along chromosomes.
Materials and methods
Strains, media and molecular genetics
A detailed strain list can be found in Table S1 in Additional data file 1. Gene deletions and epitope tagging were performed by gene targeting using PCR products [47, 48]. Deletion of the two tRNA genes SPBTRNAGLY.05 and SPBTRNAARG.04 on the left arm of chromosome 2 was achieved by replacing the region between coordinates 326,235 and 326,724 (as annotated in GeneDB) with a Kluyveromyces lactis URA3 auxotrophic marker, complementing Schizosaccharomyces pombe ura4, flanked by 142 bp direct repeats . The URA3 insertion was then lost after counterselection on 5-fluoroorotic acid, leaving one 142 bp repeat behind. Cells were grown in YE4S rich medium or EMM2 minimal medium with amino acid supplements at 25°C .
Cell cycle synchronization
For G2 arrest, strains carrying the thermosensitive cdc25-22 allele were shifted to 36.5°C for 6 hours in EMM2 medium. Subsequent synchronous release into progression through mitosis was achieved by rapid shaking of the culture flasks in ice-water until the medium cooled down to 25°C and further incubation at this temperature. Arrest and release were monitored by spindle morphology and the septation index. Mitotic metaphase arrest was achieved in strains bearing the nda3-KM311 cold-sensitive mutation by shifting the cultures to 20°C for 6-8 hours in YE4S medium. G1 arrest was performed with cells carrying the cdc10-129 allele, shifted to 36°C for 4 hours in YE4S. G1 arrest was monitored by flow cytometric analysis of DNA content.
Chromosome spreading and cell fractionation
Chromosome spreading was performed as described previously . For cell fractionation into soluble and chromosome-bound pools, spheroplasts were prepared as for chromosome spreads and processed as described , but spheroplasts were resuspended in 20 mM HEPES/KOH pH 7.9, 1.5 mM MgAc, 50 mM KAc, 10% glycerol, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 1 mM phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride (PMSF), 2.4 μg/ml chymostatin, 20 μg/ml leupeptin, 40 μg/ml aprotinin, 1.5 μg/ml pepstatin, 2 mM benzamidine and lysed by addition of 1% Triton X-100.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis was performed as described . In brief, 2 × 109 cells were fixed in 1% formaldehyde for 30 minutes at room temperature. A multibead shocker (Yasui Kikai, Osaka, Japan) was used to prepare cell extracts by glass bead breakage, followed by sonication to retrieve 400-800 bp long DNA fragments. α-HA mouse monoclonal antibody clone 16B12 (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) or α-Pk clone SV5-Pk1 (Serotec, Kidlington, UK) were added, and immunocomplexes adsorbed to protein A coupled magnetic beads (Dynal Biotech ASA, Oslo, Norway). SDS eluates were incubated overnight at 65°C to reverse the crosslink, and DNA fragments were purified and amplified using random prime PCR. After biotin labeling, the DNA cocktail was hybridized to oligonucleotide tiling arrays covering fission yeast chromosomes 2 and 3 (S_pombea520106F, Affymetrix P/N 520106). The microarray data in this report have been deposited with the Gene Expression Omnibus, accession number [GEO:GSE13517].
DNA content was measured by flow cytometry of propidium iodide-stained ethanol-fixed cells using a FACScanner (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). For microscopy, DNA was stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), septa were stained with calcofluor and microtubules were visualized in methanol-fixed cells expressing a GFP-Atb2 fusion protein. 1NM-PP1 (Toronto Research Chemicals Inc., cat. No. A603003, North York, On., Canada), used to inhibit the ark1-as3 allele, was diluted into the culture medium from a 1 mM stock solution in DMSO. Antibodies used for cytology and western blotting were α-Pk clone SV5-Pk1 (Serotec), α-GFP clone TP401 (Torrey Pines Biolabs, Houston, TX, USA), α-histone H3 antiserum ab1791 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and α-PSTAIRE serum, recognizing Cdc2, sc-53 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA).
Additional data files
The following additional data are available with the online version of this paper: a PDF containing Figures S1-S7 and Table S1 (Additional data file 1).
We would like to thank G Kelly and M Ocampo-Hafalla for their help, J Bähler, S Hauf, Y Katou, and K Shirahige for datasets, reagents and support, the LRI fission yeast laboratories for advice and reagents, J Hayles, T Toda and members of our laboratory for discussions and critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by Cancer Research UK and the Human Frontier Science Program.
- 3.Tomonaga T, Nagao K, Kawasaki Y, Furuya K, Murakami A, Morishita J, Yuasa T, Sutani T, Kearsey SE, Uhlmann F, Nasmyth K, Yanagida M: Characterization of fission yeast cohesin: essential anaphase proteolysis of Rad21 phosphorylated in the S phase. Genes Dev. 2000, 14: 2757-2770.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Wendt KS, Yoshida K, Itoh T, Bando M, Koch B, Schirghuber E, Tsutsumi S, Nagae G, Ishihara K, Mishiro T, Yahata K, Imamoto F, Aburatani H, Nakao M, Imamoto N, Maeshima K, Shirahige K, Peters JM: Cohesin mediates transcriptional insulation by CCCTC-binding factor. Nature. 2008, 451: 796-801.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Parelho V, Hadjur S, Spivakov M, Leleu M, Sauer S, Gregson HC, Jarmuz A, Canzonetta C, Webster Z, Nesterova T, Cobb BS, Yokomori K, Dillon N, Aragon L, Fisher AG, Merkenschlager M: Cohesins functionally associate with CTCF on mammalian chromosome arms. Cell. 2008, 132: 422-433.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Misulovin Z, Schwartz YB, Li X-Y, Kahn TG, Gause M, MacArthur S, Fay JC, Eisen MB, Pirrotta V, Biggin MD, Dorsett D: Association of cohesin and Nipped-B with transcriptionally active regions of the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Chromosoma. 2008, 117: 89-102.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.