The birds of Genome10K
- 1.9k Downloads
Everyone loves the birds of the world. From their haunting songs and majesty of flight to dazzling plumage and mating rituals, bird watchers – both amateurs and professionals - have marveled for centuries at their considerable adaptations. Now, we are offered a special treat with the publication of a series of papers in dedicated issues of Science, Genome Biology and GigaScience (which also included pre-publication data release). These present the successful beginnings of an international interdisciplinary venture, the Avian Phylogenomics Project that lets us view, through a genomics lens, modern bird species and the evolutionary events that produced them.
KeywordsBirds Aves Avian Vertebrate Genomics Genome10K Phylogenomics Avian phylogenomics project
Bird 10,000 genomes project
Genome 10K project
Genome 10K Community of Scientists
Million years ago.
"With the same unity of purpose shown for the Human Genome Project, we can now contemplate reading the genetic heritage of all species, beginning today with the vertebrates." G10KCOS-2009.
Modern birds trace their origins to the Jurassic epoch as reptilian ancestors of crocodile and feathered relatives emerged from the dinosaur lineages. When a 10 km-wide meteorite struck the Yucatan Peninsula 66 million years ago, the collision blackened the planet, terminating the vast and successful dinosaur world dominance. The cataclysm is widely believed to have opened new ecological niches thereby allowing the emergence of terrestrial mammal diversification and their (and our) subsequent world domination. At the same time the avian ancestral species found the skies free from Archaeopteryx. The reduced ecological constraints precipitated a contemporaneous star-like (big-bang) evolutionary radiation into the most specious terrestrial vertebrate class, Aves, which today comprises some 10,500 living bird species. This detailed history, enriched by morphological, behavioral, molecular and paleontological data has produced fascinating opportunities to examine evolutionary processes, neuroscience, and developmental biology, even as the reduction of species —largely through anthropogenic agency— has brought them into conservation focus. However, with all of this intriguing material for study, relatively few birds have enjoyed genomic attention so far: the chicken, turkey and zebra finch were the only sequenced bird genomes[5, 6, 7] when the Avian Group began. Today’s collection of reports changes that — for the better.
Vertebrate species with whole genome sequence published or posted
Lineage age (MYA)
No spp. with whole genome sequence
The reports released today from the open-access collaborative analyses of bird genome assemblies are an amazing harbinger for genome big-data collaborative projects, and the analyses and data here in many ways offer a refreshing preview of the hopes and perils of coming adventures for this, the Avian Genome Project, the G10K Project, and others like it.
At its onset, the Avian Phylogenomics Group looked at the biodiversity of birds and saw important questions and key advantages for moving forward with genome sequencing of numerous species. First of all, birds have off-loaded much of the ancestral transposon-based repeat families, a bane of mammal genome assemblies (~50% of the human genome is repetitive; while birds have but 5–10% repeats). Further, repeat family reduction, accompanied by massive segmental loss that has included more than 1000 genes, shrank the bird ancestral genome. Bird genomes are on the order of 1 Gbp versus 3 Gbp for most mammals and 6–9 Gbp for many amphibians, making birds eminently suited for such a massive sequencing project.
With 48 genomes now in hand, the group undertook extensive analyses from multiple angles and produced an overabundance of findings. The first of which was an incredibly robust phylogenetics tree for birds that resolved major ordinal splits, including many of those that occurred almost contemporaneously circa 66 MYA (1). Quite a feat since the avian hierarchy has been fraught with controversies and unresolved polytomies (i.e., ambiguous divergence nodes dividing species) in all but the most course-grained super-ordinal splits. In several cases where branching order remains unresolved, the studies presented in this collection of papers provide evidence for incomplete lineage sorting, in which segregating polymorphism is differentially inherited among descendant lineages, a common occurrence among rapidly diverging species events. In the process the Avian Phylogenomics Group fine-tuned genome assembly, alignment and phylogenetic analysis algorithms, avoiding many artifacts that big-data comparative genomics studies face today and taking the field to a new level.
Moving from phylogeny to biology, their work uncovered many new and provocative candidate gene associations (gene expansions, contractions, selection signatures or modification) for avian characteristics, such as for vocal learning (cadherin 4-CDH4), for skeletal development in parallel with fight accommodation (Alpha-2-HS-glycoprotein [AHSG], associated with bone mineral density), for efficient high oxygen metabolism to power flight (gene loss of latent TGF-β binding protein 3-LTBP3, a critical lung gene in mammals), and for feather development (expansion of β-keratins to 1623 complete and 1084 incomplete gene copies and contraction of α-keratins relative to reptiles and mammals). Loss of hens’ —and other birds’— teeth seems to involve knock-out deletions of six enamel and dentin synthesis pathway enzyme coding genes. Faster divergence rates were seen in 15 genes involving plumage pigmentation, while re-organization of the opsin gene family offers a new blueprint for the amazing wavelength breadth and visual acuity in many birds, such as the incredible precision sight of Pelicanus crispus, the Dalmatian pelican, sequenced here, that makes a living diving for ocean fish.
In all, 35 reports have so far emerged from this avian genome sequence collection, and provide rich new genomic details about avian reproduction, sex determination, sexual adaptations, behaviors, endogenous retroviral footprints, genome contraction relative to reptiles and mammals, genome exchange breakpoints and ecological accommodations. This compendium represents the most extensive comparative genomics analysis produced for any vertebrate group so far.
In the face of the big bird advances, there remain formidable challenges to the Genome 10K reverie. NextGen sequencing technology, with a price tag approaching $1000 USD, provides a real bargain for reasonable coverage of a genome the size of the human genome (~3.0 Gbp), but that $1000 sequencing product is not so good unless it is a human genome. The human genome has a reference sequenced to very high accuracy and contiguity to use as a framework, whereas most other species do not. Thus, to achieve the level of sequence completion desired, there is a need for more cost-effective technology to properly assemble short sequence contigs to long-range chromosomal contiguity without a reference. Budget constraints for the bird project were such that exceptional measures to achieve long-range contiguity could be applied only to a select subset of species. The community stands in urgent expectation of a solution to this bioinformatics dilemma for robust genome assemblies, for gene and genome feature annotations, for genome alignments, and for comparative analyses.
Further, the logistics of DNA transfer necessary for large-scale sequencing is severely impeded by permitting constraints for moving biospecimens internationally. Ironically, given the high value of information obtained by sequencing, regulatory processes constraining the movement of genomic DNA samples of threatened species— put in place to protect those species— may actually end up slowing conservation efforts. The Genome 10K Community of Scientists (G10KCOS) supports a rethinking and streamlining of these regulations now.
So where are we and will we ever hit 10,000 vertebrate genomes, let alone 10,000 bird genomes? Table 1 shows a near ten-fold increase in the number of species sequenced since G10K began 5 years ago, and the birds as a group make up just under 25%. If we continue at this rate of growth (10×/5 yrs.) we’d expect 2500–3000 species in 2019 and to hit the 10,000 mark a few years hence. Over 100,000 human genomes have already been sequenced, so with resolution of the issues discussed above, this seems achievable, and given the findings presented from just these few bird species, well worthwhile. Also encouraging is the emergence of several new sequencing consortia aimed at sequencing species of insects with human impact (Insect 5K), marine invertebrates (GIGA), snakes, fungi, microbes and plants.
The Avian Phylogenomics Group’s achievements represent a beacon of hope that we shall move forward deliberately in the quest for vertebrate genome sequence assessment, analysis and release. The finished assemblies, annotations, gene orthologs, optical maps and more of the new bird genomes are archived and widely available in open access repositories (EBI, NCBI, DDBJ) for inspection and further analyses, and were released pre-publication in the GigaScience database, Giga DB (data described in) allowing the entire community to begin their own investigations as soon as possible. We look forward to the day when nearly all vertebrate species will be curated in an online library of genomes. There, biologists of a coming generation will employ new tools for exploring the gene scripts that made the wonders of biological development and survival happen.
Note from the Editors
GigaScience, Genome Biology and a number of BMC-Series journals are collecting a series of companion papers from the following series page:http://www.biomedcentral.com/series/avian.
aSM1 Rationale for selection of species, sex, tissue sources, and bird collection details in Reference Supplemental for a detailed narrative background description.
We thank the leaders of the Avian Phylogenomics Group, Guojie Zhang, Erich Jarvis and Tom Gilbert for insightful suggestions. SJO was supported in part by Russian Ministry of Science Mega-grant no.11.G34.31.0068.
- 1.Jarvis ED, Siavash M, Aberer AJ, Li B, Houde P, Li C, Ho SYW, Faircloth BC, Nabholz B, Howard JT, Suh A, Weber CC, da Fonseca RR, Li J, Zhang F, Li H, Zhou L, Narula N, Liu L, Ganapathy G, Boussau B, Bayzid S, Zavidovych V, Subramanian S, Gabaldón T, Capella-Gutiérrez S, Huerta-Cepas J, Rekepalli B, Munch K, Schierup M: Whole genome analyses resolve the early branches in the tree of life of modern birds. Science. 2014, 346: doi:10.1126/science.1253451Google Scholar
- 2.Zhang G, Li C, Li Q, Li B, Larkin DM, Lee C, Storz JF, Antunes A, Meredith RW, Ödeen A, Cui J, Zhou Q, Xu L, Pan H, Wang Z, Jin L, Zhang P, Hu H, Yang W, Hu J, Xiao J, Yang Z, Liu Y, Xie Q, Lian J, Wen P, Zhang F, Li H, Zeng Y, Xiong Z: Comparative genomics across modern bird species reveal insights into panavian genome evolution and trait biodiversity. Science. 2014, 346: doi:10.1126/science.1251385Google Scholar
- 3.Schulte P, Alegret L, Arenillas I, Arz JA, Barton PJ, Bown PR, Bralower TJ, Christeson GL, Claeys P, Cockell CS, Collins GS, Deutsch A, Goldin TJ, Goto K, Grajales-Nishimura JM, Grieve RA, Gulick SP, Johnson KR, Kiessling W, Koeberl C, Kring DA, MacLeod KG, Matsui T, Melosh J, Montanari A, Morgan JV, Neal CR, Nichols DJ, Norris RD, Pierazzo E: The chicxulub asteroid impact and mass extinction at the cretaceous-paleogene boundary. Science. 2010, 327: 1214-1218. 10.1126/science.1177265. published online Epub Mar (doi:10.1126/science.1177265)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Dalloul RA, Long JA, Zimin AV, Aslam L, Beal K, Blomberg LA, Bouffard P, Burt DW, Crasta O, Crooijmans RPMA, Cooper K, Coulombe RA, De S, Delany ME, Dodgson JB, Dong JJ, Evans C, Frederickson KM, Flicek P, Florea L, Folkerts O, Groenen MAM, Harkins TT, Herrero J, Hoffmann S, Megens H-J, Jiang A, de Jong P, Kaiser P, Kim H: Multi-platform next-generation sequencing of the domestic turkey (meleagris gallopavo): genome assembly and analysis. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8: e1000475-10.1371/journal.pbio.1000475.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 7.Warren WC, Clayton DF, Ellegren H, Arnold AP, Hillier LW, Künstner A, Searle S, White S, Vilella AJ, Fairley S, Heger A, Kong L, Ponting CP, Jarvis ED, Mello CV, Minx P, Lovell P, Velho TAF, Ferris M, Balakrishnan CN, Sinha S, Blatti C, London SE, Li Y, Lin Y-C, George J, Sweedler J, Southey B, Gunaratne P, Watson M: The genome of a songbird. Nature. 2010, 464: 757-762. 10.1038/nature08819.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 9.Hackett SJ, Kimball RT, Reddy S, Bowie RC, Braun EL, Braun MJ, Chojnowski JL, Cox WA, Han KL, Harshman J, Huddleston CJ, Marks BD, Miglia KJ, Moore WS, Sheldon FH, Steadman DW, Witt CC, Yuri T: A phylogenomic study of birds reveals their evolutionary history. Science. 2008, 320: 1763-1768. 10.1126/science.1157704.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.