Canine leishmaniosis and its relationship to human visceral leishmaniasis in Eastern Uzbekistan
The Namangan Region in the Pap District, located in Eastern Uzbekistan is the main focus of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in Uzbekistan. In total, 28 cases of human VL were registered during 2006-2008 in this region. A study on the epidemiology of VL in this area was carried out in 2007-2008 in the villages of Chodak, Oltinkan, Gulistan and Chorkesar located at elevations of 900-1200 above sea level.
A total of 162 dogs were tested for Leishmania infection. Blood was drawn for serology and PCR. When clinical signs of the disease were present, aspirates from lymph nodes and the spleen were taken. Forty-two dogs (25.9%) had clinical signs suggestive of VL and 51 (31.5%) were sero-positive. ITS-1 PCR was performed for 135 dogs using blood and tissue samples and 40 (29.6%) of them were PCR-positive. Leishmanial parasites were cultured from lymph node or spleen aspirates from 10 dogs.
Eight Leishmania strains isolated from dogs were typed by multi-locus microsatellite typing (MLMT) and by multilocus enzyme electrophoretic analysis (MLEE), using a 15 enzyme system. These analyses revealed that the strains belong to the most common zymodeme of L. infantum, i.e., MON-1, and form a unique group when compared to MON-1 strains from other geographical regions.
The data obtained through this study confirm the existence of an active focus of VL in the Namangan region of Uzbekistan. The fact that L. infantum was the causative agent of canine infection with typical clinical signs, and also of human infection affecting only infants, suggests that a zoonotic form of VL similar in epidemiology to Mediterranean VL is present in Uzbekistan.
KeywordsVisceral Leishmaniasis Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Visceral Leishmaniasis Patient Human Visceral Leishmaniasis Canine Infection
Studies on the epidemiology of VL in this area were carried out in 2007-2008 in the villages of Chodak, Oltinkan, Gulistan and Chorkesar. A study on VL in the human population in this region found that 11% of 432 children were seropositive to L. infantum antigen by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and L. infantum DNA was amplified from Giemsa-stained slides of bone marrow from eight VL patients [4, 5].
Several sand fly species were found in a previous entomological survey in the same area with Phlebotomus sergenti being the most prevalent species (46%), followed by P. papatasi (18.8%), P. longiductus (15.5%), P. alexandri (10.3%) and other species . The suspected local vector of VL in the Namangan region is P. longiductus as it was found to transmit VL caused by L. infantum elsewhere in Central Asia [3, 6]. An entomological study carried out in the Namangan region concomitantly with the human disease study in 2007 and 2008 included the analysis of 10,000 sand flies and was in general agreement with species composition found by Maroli et al. in 2001 [, Ponirovskii and Warburg, unpublished data].
The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of canine leishmaniosis in the Namangan human VL focus and to evaluate the possible role of domestic dogs as the disease reservoir.
The total population and number of children in the villages included in the study in 2007-2008 (Source - Uzbekistan Ministry of Health).
Children up to 10 years
Animals and sampling procedures
Dogs were sampled in houses where human VL patients were diagnosed during the past 5 years, and in houses within 300 meters of patient houses. Local health workers accompanied the research team to the houses of VL patients and neighboring houses where consent was obtained for the sampling of dogs.
All sampled dogs were monitored for clinical signs compatible with canine leishmaniosis including exfoliative dermatitis, skin ulceration, onychogryphosis, lymphadenomegaly, splenomegaly and poor body condition with emaciation. Blood from all dogs was collected by cephalic or jugular venipuncture in EDTA and clot tubes for serum. Dogs with suspected clinical signs were sampled by fine needle aspirations of lymph nodes if lymphadenomegaly was present, and of the spleen when splenomegaly was palpated. Blood in EDTA was spotted on sterile filter paper for PCR, and blood in clot tubes was centrifuged and separated for serum to be used for serology. Lymph node and spleen aspirates were spotted on filter paper for PCR and in some cases also seeded in medium for parasite culture.
Samples were collected from dogs during three field trips in July of 2007, April 2008 and September 2008. The study in animals was approved by the Isaev Institute, a branch of the Uzbekistan Health Ministry, and the local health authorities in Namangan.
ELISA serology, PCR, and parasite culture
Serum anti-leishmanial antibodies were determined by ELISA using crude leishmanial antigen as previously described . Briefly, dog sera were diluted to 1:100 and incubated in L. infantum antigen-coated (MCAN/IL/1994/LRC-L639) plates for 1 hour. The plates were then incubated with Protein A conjugated to horseradish peroxidase and developed by adding the substrate 2,2-azino-di-3-ethylbenzthiazolihne sulfonate (ABTS) (Boerhinger Manneheim, Germany). Each plate was read at wavelength 405 nm after the positive control canine serum reached a value between 0.95 and 1.0. A sample was considered positive if the optical density was 2.6 times higher than the standard deviation of the control group.
DNA was extracted from blood on filter paper, lymph node and spleen aspirates, and from parasite cultures using the phenol/chloroform method, and internal transcribed spacer 1 region (ITS1) PCR was used to amplify leishmanial DNA from the samples essentially as previously described . Identification of Leishmania parasites at species level was achieved by sequencing the ITS1 PCR product .
Fine needle aspirates from the lymph node and spleen of dogs were seeded into rabbit blood-agar NNN semi-solid as described by Abdeen et al. . For mass culture, parasites were grown in Schneider's Drosophila Medium containing 10% fetal calf serum in 25 ml flasks. All cultures were maintained at 26°C.
Leishmania strain typing
Leishmania strains cultured from dogs were typed by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (MLEE) using a 15 enzymatic system and starch electrophoresis . DNA samples from these strains were also analyzed for variation in 14 multilocus microsatellite sequences shown to be highly discriminatory within L. infantum[11, 12]. This multilocus microsatellite typing (MLMT) used the primers sequences, PCR conditions and approaches for data evaluation previously described .
Chi-square test was used for determining statistical significance. For all analyses statistical significance was indicated by a p-value < 0.05. Analysis was performed by the WinPepi™ statistical package.
The numbers of dogs surveyed for leishmaniosis in each village, dogs with clinical signs suspected of the disease (clinical suspects), seropositive, PCR positive in blood or tissues, and positive by culture.
No. of dogs sampled
PCR positive of total number tested by PCR
40/135 (29. 6%)
Dogs from all four villages were positive by serology, PCR and culture. The overall rates of canine seropositivity in the different villages were similar and no association was found between seropositivity and village, dog age, or dog gender.
A significant association was found between the presence of suspected clinical signs of leishmaniosis and positive serology (p < 0.001). The positive predictive value, e.g. the likelihood that a dog with compatible clinical signs will be seropositive, was 60.5%. Twenty four dogs out of the 119 asymptomatic dogs (20.2%) were seropositive. Thus, the negative predictive value of clinical signs (i.e. percentage of asymptomatic dogs that were seronegative) was 79.8%.
The Namangan region in Uzbekistan is an endemic region for human VL as indicated by the high numbers of patients and seropositive children reported from this area during 2006-2008 [4, 5]. Although VL is a reportable disease in Uzbekistan which must be notified to the health authorities, the number of human cases is probably underestimated because of the lack of an efficient reporting system and appropriate diagnostic capabilities. This study has found that a high proportion of dogs are infected in the disease focus. Dogs harbor the same unique L. infantum MON-1 strain group identified in infected children from this region . The fact that L. infantum was the causative agent of canine infection with typical clinical signs, and also of human infection affecting only infants clinically, suggests that a zoonotic form of VL similar in epidemiology to Mediterranean VL is present in Uzbekistan.
The unique L. infantum MON-1 strain group found in the Namangan region differs by MLMT from European, Middle Eastern and North African MON-1 strains. It has been, therefore, suggested that the Uzbeki strains have been circulating in Central Asia for a long time rather than having been introduced recently . This supports the assumption that the Namangan focus is stable and that the disease is likely to have been present in this area for decades.
A significant association was found in this study between the presence of clinical signs compatible with canine leishmaniosis and seropositivity. However, a high proportion of dogs, 20.2%, were seropositive without clinical signs of infection, in agreement with previous surveys on canine leishmaniosis in endemic areas [13, 14]. As found in other studies on canine leishmaniosis, this indicates that dogs in this region are infected asymptomatically and may serve as peri-domestic reservoirs for infection even without showing signs of infection [15, 16]. The presence of clinical signs compatible with leishmaniosis can be helpful for the detection of some of the clinical cases, but it is not sufficient for diagnosis as some cases are infected without clinical signs, and others have non-specific clinical signs such as lymphadenomegaly, splenomegaly and epistaxis that can be caused also by other infectious diseases or inflammatory processes associated with other conditions .
The sensitivity of the PCR technique used in this study was limited due to the fact that it was done on blood in most dogs, which is considered less sensitive than lymph node, bone marrow or spleen [18, 19]. The ITS-1 PCR used is also less sensitive than kDNA PCR, however it is useful for determining the Leishmania species causing the infection . The ability to determine the species of the infecting agent is of particular importance in areas such as the Namangan region where P. sergenti, the major sandfly vector of Leishmania tropica, is present , as this species is able to cause VL in humans and dogs, in addition to being a major cause of human cutaneous leishmaniasis [21, 22, 23].
The seroprevalence rate of the dogs studied in the Namangan region is among the highest found in surveys of canine populations in endemic regions, with 8.1% found among dogs in the area of Madrid, Spain, 26% found in Malllorca, Spain, and 29.6% in the south of France [24, 13, 14]. In comparison to studies in other foci of VL, the Namangan region foci is located in an area where there is little awareness among the local population of the fact that this disease is zoonotic and associated with canine infection. No prevention of sand fly bites to dogs using topical insecticides in collars or spot on formulations is practiced as these measures are not available and cost-prohibitive. Vaccines against canine leishmaniosis could potentially also be effective in decreasing canine and human infection , as the Namangan focus is of limited geographic size and a vaccine campaign could reach the majority of households and domestic dogs living in the focus.
In conclusion, widespread canine infection with a unique strain of L. infantum, also present in infected humans, has been found in the Namangan region of Uzbekistan. The pattern of disease appears to be zoonotic and similar in epidemiology to the Mediterranean form of VL. Preventative measures involving protection of dogs from becoming infected by sand fly bites or limiting the transmission of infection to sand flies from infected dogs could be helpful in decreasing the disease incidence in humans.
This study was supported by the European Commission INTAS program grant no. 05-1000008-8043. The authors thank JP Dedet and F Pratlong from the University of Montpellier for the MLEE analysis of dog isolates. Publication of the CVBD6 thematic series has been sponsored by Bayer Animal Health GmbH
- 1.Finkelstein Y: Visceral'nyi leishmnaioz v Namanganskoi oblasti. Med Parazitol (Mosk). 1956, 25: 158-159.Google Scholar
- 2.Ponirovskii EN, Strelkova MV, Goncharov DB, Zhirenkina EN, Chernikova IA: Visceral leishmaniasis in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS): results and basic lines of further study. Med Parazitol (Bolezni). 2006, 4: 25-31.Google Scholar
- 4.Schönian G, Kovalenko DA, Razakov SA, Baneth G, Ponirovsky EN, Warburg A, Nasyrova RM, Ponomareva VI, Fatulla AA: Epidemiology of visceral leishmaniasis in eastern Uzbekistan and identification of Leishmania infantum as its cause. Proceedings of the 4TH World Congress on Leishmaniasis. 3-7 February 2009; Luckow, India. Edited by: Neeloo Singh. 2009, 83-84.Google Scholar
- 5.Alam MZ, Kovalenko DA, Kuhls K, Nasyrova RM, Ponomareva VI, Fatullaeva AA, Razakov SA, Schnur LF, Schönian G: Identification of the agent causing visceral leishmaniasis in Uzbeki and Tajiki foci by analysing parasite DNA extracted from patients' Giemsa-stained tissue preparations. Parasitology. 2009, 136: 981-986. 10.1017/S0031182009006465.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Kuhls K, Chicharro C, Canavate C, Cortes S, Campino L, Haralambous C, Soteriadou K, Pratlong F, Dedet JP, Mauricio I, Miles M, Schaar M, Ochsenreither S, Radtke OA, Schonian G: Differentiation and Gene Flow among European Populations of Leishmania infantum MON-1. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008, 2: e261-10.1371/journal.pntd.0000261.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Solano-Gallego L, Morell P, Arboix M, Alberola J, Ferrer L: Prevalence of Leishmania infantum infection in dogs living in an area of canine leishmaniasis endemicity using PCR on several tissues and serology. J Clin Microbiol. 2001, 39: 560-563. 10.1128/JCM.39.2.560-563.2001.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Michalsky EM, Rocha MF, da Rocha Lima AC, França-Silva JC, Pires MQ, Oliveira FS, Pacheco RS, dos Santos SL, Barata RA, Romanha AJ, Fortes-Dias CL, Dias ES: Infectivity of seropositive dogs, showing different clinical forms of leishmaniasis, to Lutzomyia longipalpis phlebotomine sand flies. Vet Parasitol. 2007, 147: 67-76. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.03.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Palatnik-de-Sousa CB, Silva-Antunes I, Morgado Ade A, Menz I, Palatnik M, Lavor C: Decrease of the incidence of human and canine visceral leishmaniasis after dog vaccination with Leishmune in Brazilian endemic areas. Vaccine. 2009, 27: 3505-3512. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.03.045.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.