Tight performance bounds for two-way opportunistic amplify-and-forward wireless relaying networks with TDBC protocols
- 2k Downloads
Based on amplify-and-forward network coding (AFNC) protocol, the outage probability and ergodic capacity of two-way network coding opportunistic relaying (TWOR-AFNC) systems are investigated as well as the corresponding closed-form solutions. For the TWOR-AFNC systems, it is investigated under two scenarios, namely, the TWOR-AFNC systems without direct link (TWOR-AFNC-Nodir) and the TWOR-AFNC systems with direct link (TWOR-AFNC-Dir). First, we investigate TWOR-AFNC-Nodir systems by employing the approximate analysis in high SNR, and obtain closed-form solutions to the cumulative distribution function (CDF) and the probability density function (PDF) of the instantaneous end-to-end signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) with very simple expressions. The derived simple expressions are given by defining an equivalent variable ω eq-k (θ), 2 ≤ θ ≤ 3. When θ = 2, the derived results are the tight lower bounds to CDF and PDF. The sequent simulation demonstrates that the derived tight lower bounds are also very effective over the entire SNR region though which the results are derived in high SNR approximation. Then, with the derived tight closed-form lower bound solutions (θ = 2) in TWOR-AFNC-Nodir systems, we investigate TWOR-AFNC-Dir systems as well as the overall comparison of the outage probability and the ergodic capacity between the two system models. The comparison analysis performed over path loss model basis shows that, in urban environment, due to utilizing the direct link the TWOR-AFNC-Dir outperform considerably the TWOR-AF-Nodir systems. However, when the value of path loss exponent is relatively large, the achievable gain is very small and the direct link can be omitted. In this case, the TWOR-AFNC-Dir model can be displaced by TWOR-AFNC-Nodir model having lower implementation complexity.
Keywordsopportunistic relaying amplify-and-forward outage probability ergodic capacity
- AC phase
- BC phase
cumulative distribution function
moment generating function
maximum ratio combining
probability density function
time division broadcast
two-way network coding opportunistic relaying
TWOR-NC systems where there is direct link between two sources
TWOR-NC systems where there is no direct link between two sources.
Cooperative diversity is an overwhelming research topic in wireless networks [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. The notion of cooperative communications is to enable transmit and receive cooperation at user level by forming virtual multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) system, so that the overall performance including power efficiency and communications reliability can be improved greatly. However, due to the half-duplex constraint in practical systems, the advantages of the cooperative diversity come at the expense of both the spectral efficiency and the implementation complexity. Especially, in multi-relay wireless network with K relays, to achieve the full diversity order K + 1 orthogonal wireless channels (slot or frequency) are required, which incurs in the enhancement of implementation complexity as the perfect time synchronization among the relays.
In order to reduce the implementation complexity and to improve the spectrum efficiency but still realize the potential benefits of multi-relay cooperation, based on the network coding (NC) techniques  and the opportunistic relaying (OR) techniques , the two-way network coding opportunistic relaying (TWOR-NC) has emerged as a promising solution , and instantly become one of research hot topics in wireless network fields [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17]. The basic idea of the TWOR-NC is that, in multi-relay two-way systems, a round of signals exchange between two sources consists of two phases, namely, access phase (AC phase) and broadcast phase (BC phase). Notice that, according to the different transmission protocols employed, time division broadcast (TDBC) and multi-access broadcast (MABC), the AC phase can include one or two sub-slots while the BC phase only does one slot. In AC phase, two sources transmit their signals to relays while the relays are listening state. After receiving the signals from both sources, the best relay selection is performed based on a predefined criterion, which results in that only a best relay is selected for NC-ing the received signals and broadcasting the NC-ed signal in BC phase. Thus, after performing NC on the received signals, the selected best relay simultaneously broadcasts the NC-ed signal to two sources. After receiving the broadcasted signal from the best relay, each source can remove the self-interference from the received signal by taking its own transmitted signal as prior. Thus, the two sources can obtain the wished signal. Obviously, the TWOR-NC perfectly integrates the NC and OR techniques and possesses the advantages of the two techniques. The TWOR-NC systems hold the improvement not only on the spectral efficiency improved by as much as 33 or 50% due to the employing of NC , but also on the implementation complexity decreased because the perfect time synchronization among the relays is no longer performed.
Currently, there are a few literatures contributing to TWOR-NC systems [9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17]. In the existing works, based on the fact that whether the direct link between two sources is utilized, the TWOR-NC systems can be grouped into two kinds. The first is the TWOR-NC systems in which there is no direct link, which is referred to as TWOR-NC-Nodir model in the work. On the contrary, in the second TWOR-NC systems where the direct link is utilized perfectly, which is called the TWOR-NC-Dir model. Oechtering and Boche  first investigated the TWOR-NC-Nodir systems under the MABC transmission protocol. In the work, the employed NC scheme was superposition network coding [4, 5, 6]. For the MABC TWOR-NC-Nodir systems, the updated contribution can be found in , where the decode-and-forward NC (DFNC) was employed. By comparing the achievable maximum diversity gains of two TWOR-DFNC-Nodir sytems where the max-min criterion and maxmum sum-rate criterion were adopted, respectively, authors have presented a intelligent switching selection criterion which switches between max-min and maximum sum-rate criterions according to a certain threshold of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). In , with the amplify-and-forward NC (AFNC) protocol, authors first obtained the end-to-end rate expressions, R12 and R21. Then, with the aim of maximizing the sum rate of R12 and R21, i.e., max(R12 and R21), the maximum sum-rate criterion has been proposed. In , besides the investigation of the TWOR-NC-Nodir system based on the conventional single best relay selection criterion, authors have studied the TWOR-NC-Nodir system where a double best relay selection criterion was employed. In , with the aim of minimzing pairwise error probability, authors have investigated the TWOR-DFNC-Nodir systems.
At the same time, compared with the decode-and-forward TWOR , TWOR-AFNC is one of the most attractive protocols due to its operational simplicity. Motivated by its practical implementation potential, the TWOR-AFNC systems have been studied in [15, 16, 17] under different channels and assumptions. In these studies, the employed system models are still TWOR-AFNC-Nodir. With the Rayleigh channels, in  authors have pointed out that both the instantaneous end-to-end SNRs considered as independence random variables (RVs) in  are dependent mutually, and have presented the exact closed-form expression for outage probability in integral form as well as the lower bound. A more overall investigation of the TWOR-AFNC-Nodir has been presented in .
Observing the above summarization, we can find that, in existing works, the TWOR-NC-Nodir systems have been investigated widely. For the one with direct link, TWOR-NC-Dir, there is no open report yet. However, in practical implementation systems, such direct link between two sources is always existent. In half-duplex systems, the employed transmission protocol should be TDBC when the direct link is exploited. The reliability of TWOR-NC systems can be further improved when such practical existence direct transmission exploited. For the investigation of TWOR-NC-Dir systems, the canonical argument line  is that we must first obtain the statistical description of the instantaneous end-to-end SNRs for the systems without direct link, which includes cumulative distribution function (CDF), probability density function (PDF), moment generating function (MGF), etc. Besides this, the ones of direct link gains are also required. With these obtained statistical results of the system without direct link, we can investigate the TWOR-NC-Dir systems by employing some complicated mathematic manipulations such as (inverse) Laplace transformation, integral, etc. This mathematic manipulation requires that the statistical descriptions of the end-to-end SNRs for the systems without direct link should be given with simple closed-form expressions. However, observing the results given in [16, 17], we find that it is difficult to obtain the simple closed-form expressions of these statistics even if the lower bound expression (4) in  is considered. Motivated by these observations, the work contributes to a comprehensive comparison investigation for the TWOR-AFNC. We will first obtain the closed-form tight lower bound statistical descriptions for the TWOR-AFNC-Nodir, and then by using the derived tight lower bound we will study performance of the TWOR-AFNC-Dir systems.
2. TWOR-AFNC system model
3. PDF and CDF to the equivalent instantaneous end-to-end SNR
In this section, we investigate the statistical characteristic of the TWOR-AFNC scheme. According to the statement in Section 1, the statistical description of the TWOR-AFNC-Nodir systems is required, firstly. Then, one of TWOR-AFNC-Dir systems can be obtained readily. Thus, we first present the statistical description of the TWOR-AFNC-Nodir systems.
3.1. Statistical description for TWOR-AFNC-Nodir systems
where b1,...,b k a binary sequence is whose elements assume the value of zero or one.
3.2. Statistical description for TWOR-AFNC-Dir systems
3.3. Ergodic capacity for TWOR-AFNC systems
where ε1(m) is the exponential integral function defined by .
3.4. Outage probabilities for TWOR-AFNC systems
4. Simulation analysis
With the above investigation, the simulations are presented in this section. In the simulation, we employ a path loss model , which includes path loss, show fading, and frequency non-selective fading because the rich scattering environment is given by , where h mn and d mn , respectively, denote the link gain and the distance from node m to n, c is attenuation constant, and p is the path loss exponent. In general, in urban or suburban environment, the path loss exponent is a little greater than 3. Without loss of generality, we assume that the distance between two sources is normalized to 1, the normalized distance from S1 to relay R k is d1k, and the one from S2 to R k is d2k. It is also assumed that all the relays are close together and the inter-relay distances are enough small. This assumption is commonly used in the context of cooperative diversity systems and guarantees equivalent average variances: ω1kand ω2kfor links S1 - > R k and S2 - > R k . Thus, we have ω0 = c2, ω1k= ω0(d1k)-p, and ω2k= ω0(1-d1k)-p, where k = 1,...,K, K is the maximum of the achievable relays.
Figure 3 is the comparison of ergodic capacity between the symmetric channels and asymmetric channels for TWOR-AFNC systems with and without direct link cases. It is observed that, in the both TWOR-AFNC systems, the ergodic capacities of symmetric channels are granter than the one of asymmetric channels. When the number of relays is small, the gain of ergodic capacity achieved by symmetric channels over the asymmetric one is increasing with K. However, when K is relatively large (K > 6), it equals to a constant, approximately.
Through the high SNR approximation, we first obtain the closed-form analytical solutions to CDF and PDF of the end-to-end SNR for TWOR-AF-Nodir systems, and present the corresponding tight lower bound. Though the tight lower bounds are obtained in high SNR approximation, the sequent simulations demonstrate that the high SNR approximation results are also effective over the entire SNR region. Especially, the results are given with very simple closed-form expressions, which are significant for the investigation of the TWOR-AFNC systems having direct link between two sources. With the approximate lower bounds to PDF and CDF for TWOR-AF-Nodir systems, the outage performance and the ergodic capacity for TWOR-AF-Dir systems are investigated comprehensively. The presented simulation indicates that, in urban environment, by utilizing the direct link the TWOR-AF systems can obtain the considerable improvement on the performance. However, when the value of path loss exponent is large relatively, the TWOR-AF-Dir model can be displaced with the TWOR-AF-Nodir model having lower implementation complexity.
The study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61071090 and 61171093, by the Postgraduate Innovation Program of Scientific Research of Jiangsu Province under Grant CX10B-184Z and CXZZ11_0388, and by the project 11KJA510001 and PAPD.
- 6.Xiangdong J, Haiyang F: Research on the outage exponent of superposition coding relaying with only relay-to-source channel state feedback. Chin J Electron (CJE) 2011, 20(1):161-164.Google Scholar
- 11.Kyu-Sung H, Young-Chai K, Alouini MS: Performance bounds for two-way amplify-and-forward relaying based on relay path selection. IEEE 69th Proc Vehicular Technology Conference, 2009. VTC Spring 2009 2009, 1-5.Google Scholar
- 12.Yonghui L, Louie RHY, Vucetic B: Relay selection with network coding in two-way relay channels. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 59(9):4489-4499.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.