Cardiac mri strain analysis demonstrates systemic right ventricular dysfunction late after atrial switch procedure despite normal ejection fraction

  • Karen Smith
  • Kan N Hor
  • Wojciech Mazur
  • Janaka P Wansapura
  • Robert J Fleck
  • D Woodrow Benson
  • William M Gottliebson
Open Access
Poster presentation
  • 699 Downloads

Keywords

Ejection Fraction Cardiac Dysfunction Circumferential Strain Feature Tracking Myocardial Strain 

Introduction

The atrial switch operation (ASO), performed routinely until the early 1990's for d-Transposition of the Great Arteries (d-TGA), resulted in a systemic right ventricle (SRV). Anecdotal qualitative data has suggested that the RV is doomed to progressive dysfunction and eventual systolic failure when placed in the systemic circulation over the long term. Quantitative analysis of SRV function after ASO has only recently been available via cardiac MRI (CMR) assessment of SRV Ejection Fraction (EF), an index that has proven to be somewhat insensitive to subtle cardiac dysfunction in other cardiac conditions. We hypothesized that CMR-based myocardial strain (ε) assessment would prove a more sensitive indicator of cardiac dysfunction than SRV EF in ASO subjects.

Purpose

Determine the changes in myocardial strain in a cross section of ASO patients.

Methods

Data was reviewed from d-TGA ASO subjects and normal young-adult control subjects, all of whom underwent CMR at our center for clinical or research indications. Data included demographics and systemic ventricular EF via standard techniques. Systemic ventricular circumferential strain (εcc) was measured with feature tracking software (Diogenes®, TomTEC Inc, Munich, Germany). The ASO subjects also had radial (εrr), and longitudingal (εll) SRV strains measured, and these subjects were further stratified into global functional classes by SRV EF as normal (>55%) or depressed (< 55%). Statistical comparisons were performed between SRV EF and ε, as well as age/time since surgery, via student's t-tests.

Results

Data from 33 ASO subjects and 14 controls was analyzed. Mean SRV εcc magnitude for all post ASO subjects was lower than systemic ventricular εcc magnitude in controls, regardless of EF status, and was lower still for ASO subjects with abnormal SRV EF (see Table 1 for further details). However, there was no significant correlation between time since ASO and SRV EF or SRV εcc magnitude (r2 = 0.02 and 0.14) (Figure 1 a-b). In addition, neither εll nor εrr strain indexes were significantly different between ASO classes.
Table 1

Comparison of CMR findings between control and ASO groups

Groups Parameters

Controls (n = 14)

ASO normal SRV EF (n-13)

ASO low SRV EF (n = 20)

Age (years)

17.3 ± 8.4

22.1 ± 6.1

23.6 ± 6.3

Heart rate (bbm)

73 ± 14

66 ± 13

70 ± 12

Age at ASO (mo)

-

17 ± 15

22 ± 16

EF (%)

63.8 ± 3.0

60.7 ± 6.1

47.2 ± 7.4*

Ecc

-18.3 ± 1.6

-10.9 ± 2.2*

-9.1 ± 2.7*

Err

-

9.0 ± 3.9

9.9 ± 4.8

Ell

-

-10.6 ± 2.0

-8.5 ± 4.0

Figure 1

(a) There is no siginificant correlation between time since arterial switch operation (ASO) and systemic right ventricular (SRV) ejection fraction (EF). r2 = 0.02. (b) nor is there a significant correlation between time since ASO and SRV circumferential strain (Ecc) (r2 = 0.14).

Conclusion

In ASO patients with normal EF, SRV εcc magnitude is decreased compared with systemic ventricular εcc in controls. SRV εcc magnitude is further depressed in ASO patients with abnormal SRV EF. However, SRV systolic function, as measured by both EF and ε, was not associated with time since ASO. This data suggests that as a more sensitive indicator of SRV function, SRV εcc surveillance should be included routinely as a parameter of SRV functional assessment.

Copyright information

© Smith et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen Smith
    • 1
  • Kan N Hor
    • 1
  • Wojciech Mazur
    • 2
  • Janaka P Wansapura
    • 1
  • Robert J Fleck
    • 1
  • D Woodrow Benson
    • 1
  • William M Gottliebson
    • 1
  1. 1.Cincinnati Children's HospitalCincinnatiUSA
  2. 2.Ohio Heart and Vascular CenterCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations