A novel tumor suppressor gene ECRG4 interacts directly with TMPRSS11A (ECRG1) to inhibit cancer cell growth in esophageal carcinoma
- 3.9k Downloads
The esophageal carcinoma related gene 4 (ECRG4) was initially identified and cloned from human normal esophageal epithelium in our laboratory (GenBank accession no.AF325503). ECRG4 has been described as a novel tumor suppressor gene associated with prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
In this study, binding affinity assay in vitro and co-immunoprecipitation experiment in vivo were utilized to verify the physical interaction between ECRG4 and transmembrane protease, serine 11A (TMPRSS11A, also known as ECRG1, GenBank accession no. AF 071882). Then, p21 protein expression, cell cycle and cell proliferation regulations were examined after ECRG4 and ECRG1 co-transfection in ESCC cells.
We revealed for the first time that ECRG4 interacted directly with ECRG1 to inhibit cancer cell proliferation and induce cell cycle G1 phase block in ESCC. Binding affinity and co-immunoprecipitation assays demonstrated that ECRG4 interacted directly with ECRG1 in ESCC cells. Furthermore, the ECRG4 and ECRG1 co-expression remarkably upregulatd p21 protein level by Western blot (P < 0.001), induced cell cycle G1 phase block by flow cytometric analysis (P < 0.001) and suppressed cell proliferation by MTT and BrdU assay (both P < 0.01) in ESCC cells.
ECRG4 interacts directly with ECRG1 to upregulate p21 protein expression, induce cell cycle G1 phase block and inhibit cancer cells proliferation in ESCC.
KeywordsEsophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Esophageal Carcinoma Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell EC9706 Cell Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell Line
esophageal cancer related gene 4
esophageal cancer related gene 1
esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Esophageal carcinoma ranks 7th and 6th in terms of cancer incidence and mortality rate worldwide, respectively . Moreover, nearly 50% of esophageal carcinoma cases in the world occurred in China . Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), which is the most common histological subtype, accounts for ~90% of all esophageal cancers diagnosed in China each year. Despite advances in clinical comprehensive treatment, ESCC prognosis remains poor due to its diffuse and invasive nature. To date, the molecular pathogenesis of ESCC is still unclear [3, 4]. At present, the focus of biology studies is transitioning from the cloning of novel genes to characterizing the function of the protein product. As a result, a major research effort has been directed at identifying the function of novel specific esophageal cancer related genes and elucidating the relevant molecular interactions of protein products which may play critical roles in ESCC.
The ECRG4 gene (GenBank accession no. AF 325503) was initially identified and cloned in our laboratory from human normal esophageal epithelium [5, 6, 7]. Either ECRG4 RNA or ECRG4 protein was an independent prognostic factor for ESCC, and the low expression of ECRG4 gene in patients with ESCC was associated with poor prognosis [8, 9]. Furthermore, ECRG4 overexpression in ESCC cells inhibited tumor cells growth and invasion [9, 10]. And recent studies showed that ECRG4 might be involved in the development of multi-tumors [11, 12, 13].
In the present study, we further explored the functional interaction between ECRG4 and transmembrane protease, serine 11A (TMPRSS11A, also known as ECRG1) to induce cell cycle G1 phase block and suppress cell growth in ESCC.
Construction of eukaryotic expression vector and transfection
The coding region of ECRG4 or ECRG1 cDNA was subcloned into constitutive mammalian expression vector pcDNA3.1 (Invitrogen). The cDNA was then fully sequenced to ensure that no mutation was introduced during the PCR amplification. The resulting plasmid construct was named pcDNA3.1-His-ECRG4 and pcDNA3.1-FLAG-ECRG1. The human esophageal squamous cell line EC9706 was established and studied by Han et al . EC9706 cells were transfected with pcDNA3.1-His-ECRG4 or pcDNA3.1-FLAG-ECRG1 using lipofectamine™ 2000 (Invitrogen, CA), according to the manufacturer's protocol.
Produce and purification of recombinant ECRG4 protein
The ECRG4 cDNA was excised from pGEM-T-ECRG4 and subcloned into the pET30a (+) plasmid, producing an inducible expression vector coding for His-tagged ECRG4 soluble protein. Subsequently, the recombinant plasmids were transformed into Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) cells to produce N-terminal His-tagged soluble ECRG4 protein. Fusion protein expression in Escherichia coli BL21 cells was induced with 0.3 mM isopropyl-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), and the protein was purified by affinity chromatography with nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) resin (Novagen), according to the manufacturer's protocol. The purified fusion protein was dialyzed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 0.1 M sodium phosphate and 0.15 M sodium chloride [pH 7.4]) to remove the denaturant .
Western blot analysis
Whole-cell lysates of EC9706 cells were prepared by incubating cells in RIPA buffer (1% NP-40; 0.5% sodium deoxycholate; 0.1% SDS; 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5]) containing protease inhibitors. Cell lysates were centrifuged at 10,000 g for 10 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was collected, and the protein concentration was measured using the BCA™ Protein Assay Kit (Pierce). Proteins (40 ug) in cell lysates or culture media were separated by 10-15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto PVDF membrane. The membranes were blocked in TBST (0.2 M NaCl; 10 mM Tris pH7.4; 0.2% Tween20)/5% skim milk for 2 hours at room temperature and then incubated with primary antibodies in TBST/5% skim milk. The primary antibodies used for Western blot analysis were monoclonal mouse anti-His (1:4000), monoclonal mouse anti-FLAG (1:4000), polyclonal rabbit anti-p21 (1:4000) and monoclonal mouse anti-β-actin (1:4000). The membranes were then washed three times with TBST, followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1:4000) in TBST/5% skim milk. Bound antibody was visualized using ECL detection reagent.
Cell proliferation assays
Cell growth and viability were evaluated by using MTT and BrdU assays, respectively. For MTT assay, the transfected cells were seeded into 96-well plates (1.5 × 103 cells/well). After culturing for various durations, cell proliferation was evaluated by thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay, according to the manufacturer's protocol (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA). In brief, 10 μl MTT solution (5 mg/ml) was added to each well, then the cells were cultured for another 4 hours at 37°C, and 100 μl DMSO was added to each well and mix vigorously to solubilize colored crystals produced within the living cells. The absorbance at 570 nm was measured by using a multi-well scanning spectrophotometer Victor 3. For the BrdU assay, the transfected cells were seeded into 96-well plates (1 × 105 cells/well). After transfection for two days, the BrdU assay (BrdU cell proliferation ELISA, Roche) was carried out according to the manufacture's instructions.
Flow cytometric analysis of cell cycle
The transfected cells were seeded at a density of 106 cells/100-mm dish in RPMI-1640 medium with 10% FBS for 48 hours. Then cells were washed with ice-cold PBS, harvested and fixed in 70% ethanol for 30 minutes. Cells were treated with RNase A and stained with 25 μg/ml propidium iodide (PI). Samples were analyzed using a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson), according to the manufacturer's protocol. Experiments were performed three times in triplicate.
Binding affinity assay
Recombinant purified His-ECRG4 protein was coated on 96-well microtiter plates (5 μg per well) followed by bovine serum albumin blocking. The whole-cell lysates of EC9706 cells with FLAG-ECRG1 transfection was then added to the wells and incubated for 2 h. After washing, anti-FLAG or anti- Miz-1 antibody was added to the wells and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Santa Cruz, CA) was added to the wells and incubated for 20 min at 37°C. After incubation, the substrate o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride was added to the wells, and the colored reaction product was quantified using a microplate reader at 490 nm .
Immunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis was performed according to the standard protocol (Sigma). EC9706 cells were co-transfected with pcDNA3.1-His-ECRG4 (10 μg) and pcDNA3.1-FLAG-ECRG1 (3.3 μg) or with control vectors pcDNA3.1 (10 μg) in 10 cm dishes using Lipofectamine™2000 (Invitrogen, CA). Two days after transfection, cells were solubilized with 1 ml of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH7.5], 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate) (Roche) on ice for 30 minutes. Insoluble materials were removed by centrifugation for 20s at 12,000 g at 4°C. The supernatant was collected and the protein concentration was measured by Bradford method to be adjusted to a final concentration of 1 mg/ml. The supernatant was precleared with Protein G (Roche) for 3 h at 4°C. Then 500 μl of lysate was incubated with anti-His or anti-FLAG antibody coupled to protein G-Sepharose beads overnight at 4°C with gentle rotation. The beads were washed with wash buffer (Wash 1: 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate; Wash 2: 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH7.5], 500 mM NaCl, 0.1% NP40, 0.05% sodium deoxycholate; Wash 3: 10 mM Tris-HCl [pH7.5], 0.1% NP40, 0.05% sodium deoxycholate). The immunocomplex retained on the beads were eluted in 2× Laemmli buffer (20% glycerol, 2%SDS, 250 mM Tris pH6.8, 10% β-mercaptoethanol and 0.1% bromophenol blue), boiled and microcentrifuged. Supernatant proteins were subjected to 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and immunoblot analysis for anti-FLAG or anti-His were performed as described above.
All statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS statistical program (version 13.0). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
ECRG4 bind to ECRG1 in vitro
ECRG4 interacted directly with ECRG1 in vivo
ECRG4 and ECRG1 co-expression increased p21 expression
ECRG4 and ECRG1 co-expression reinforced cell cycle G1 phase block
ECRG4 and ECRG1 induced cell cycle G1 phase block
60.1 ± 2.11
24.5 ± 1.53
15.4 ± 1.67
70.6 ± 1.62
15.7 ± 1.35
13.7 ± 0.87
66.9 ± 1.58
19.6 ± 1.41
13.5 ± 1.03
75.8 ± 1.82
11.3 ± 1.37
ECRG4 and ECRG1 co-expression inhibited tumor cell growth
Discussion and Conclusions
ESCC is a highly invasive and clinically challenging cancer in China. Until now, its molecular basis remains poorly understood. And ECRG4 gene is highly conserved among various species, suggesting an important role for ECRG4 in eukaryotic cells. However, its exactly biological function in carcinogenesis is still unclear. Our previous study demonstrated that ECRG4 is a novel tumor suppressor gene in ESCC. ECRG4 gene promoter hypermethylation accounted for decreased expression in ESCC, and the low expression of ECRG4 protein in patients with ESCC was associated with poor prognosis [7, 9]. These findings were also supported by similar studies of other research groups [8, 11, 12]. Furthermore, restoration of ECRG4 expression in tumor cells inhibited cell growth and invasion [9, 10, 13]. And ECRG4 was also involved in cell differentiation and senescence [16, 17, 18, 19].
ECRG1 (GenBank accession no. AF 071882) was also the candidate tumor suppressor gene in ESCC. The ECRG1 290 Arg/Gln and Gln/Gln genotypes were associated with increased risk for squamous cell carcinoma, compared with that of 290 Arg/Arg [20, 21, 22]. Our previous results demonstrated that overexpression of ECRG1 gene in ESCC cells inhibited tumor cells growth in vitro and in vivo [23, 24]. Furthermore, ECRG1 could induce cell cycle G1 phase arrest and cell senescence through interaction with Miz-1 protein in ESCC cells [25, 26, 27]. These findings indicated that ECRG1 played an important role in controlling the gene expression involved in cell cycle G1 phase regulation and cell proliferation in ESCC.
Our data demonstrated that ECRG4 could also cause cell cycle G1 phase block by inducing p21 upregulation in ESCC cells . And Bioinformatics analysis indicated that ECRG4 might be directly associated with ECRG1 by protein-protein interaction. In this study, binding affinity assay also demonstrated that ECRG4 could bind to ECRG1. Therefore, we reasoned that ECRG4 might interact with ECRG1 to co-regulate cell cycle and cell proliferation. As the binding affinity assay provided only potential interaction, we further performed co-immunoprecipitation assay in vivo to confirm the biological interaction between ECRG1 and ECRG4 in ESCC cells. In order to get a better understanding of the association of ECRG1 and ECRG4 on cell cycle and cell proliferation, as well as various physiological processes, the ECRG1 and ECRG4 null EC9706 cell line was utilized to examine the effect. The results showed that cell cycle G1 phase block and cell proliferation inhibition effects were remarkably enhanced by ECRG1 and ECRG4 co-expression in ESCC cells. It indicated that ECRG1 and ECRG4 might act as co-functional proteins in cell cycle and growth regulation in ESCC.
The cell cycle alteration plays a major role in carcinogenesis. Once the cell cycle regulation balance was broken, it might result in tumorigenesis. Evidence has revealed that many oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes are directly involved in regulation of cell cycle events . The p21 and p16 genes, critical cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, were functionally relevant to the regulation of cell cycle G1 phase. In the present research, we observed that ECRG4 and ECRG1 co-expression significantly induced cell cycle G1 phase block through upregulating p21 expression in ESCC cells. However, there was no significant change of p16 expression level in ESCC cells (data not shown). Based on our data, we speculated that ECRG1 and ECRG4 might co-regulate p21 expression to control cell cycle progression in ESCC. It is well known that p21 upregulation is able to block the cell cycle at G1 phase [29, 30]. So the p21 overexpression induced by ECRG4 and ECRG1 co-expression could be the possible molecular mechanism for cell cycle G1 phase block and growth suppression in ESCC.
Taken together, we discovered for the first time that ECRG4 directly interacted with ECRG1 to upregulate p21 expression, induce cell cycle G1 phase block and inhibit cancer cells proliferation in ESCC. Our study implied that the interaction of ECRG4 with ECRG1 could be an important therapeutic target for ESCC.
This work was supported by the Chinese State Key Projects for Basic Research (2004CB518701) and the Henan Province Science Research Key Project (0624410058). We thank professor Wei Jing of Burnham Institute Cancer Center (La Jolla, CA92037, USA) for helpful comments on this manuscript.
- 3.Luo A, Kong J, Hu G, Liew CC, Xiong M, Wang X, Ji J, Wang T, Zhi H, Wu M, Liu Z: Discovery of Ca2+-relevant and differentiation-associated genes downregulated in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using cDNA microarray. Oncogene. 2004, 23: 1291-1299. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207218.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Bi MX, Han WD, Lu SX: Using lab on-line to clone and identify the esophageal cancer related gene 4. Sheng Wu Hua Xue Yu Sheng Wu Wu Li Xue Bao (Shanghai). 2001, 33: 257-261.Google Scholar
- 6.Su T, Liu H, Lu S: Cloning and identification of cDNA fragments related to human esophageal cancer. Chin J Oncol. 1998, 20: 254-257.Google Scholar
- 9.Li LW, Yu XY, Yang Y, Zhanag CP, Guo LP, Lu SH: Expression of esophageal cancer related gene 4 (ECRG4), a novel tumor suppressor gene, in esophageal cancer and its inhibitory effect on the tumor growth in vitro and in vivo. Int J Cancer. 2009, 125: 1505-1513. 10.1002/ijc.24513.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Woo JM, Park SJ, Kang HI, Kim BG, Shim SB, Jee SW, Lee SH, Sin JS, Bae CJ, Jang MK, Cho C, Hwang DY, Kim CK: Characterization of changes in global gene expression in the brain of neuron-specific enolase/human Tau23 transgenic mice in response to overexpression of Tau protein. Int J Mol Med. 2010, 25: 667-675.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Bachmann K, Shahmiri S, Kaifi J, Schurr P, Mann O, Rawnaq T, Block S, Kalinin V, Izbicki JR, Strate T: Polymorphism Arg290Arg in esophageal-cancer-related gene 1 (ECRG1) is a prognostic factor for survival in esophageal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009, 13: 181-187. 10.1007/s11605-008-0766-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Blessmann M, Pohlenz P, Atac A, Kaifi JT, Eulenburg C, Kalinin V, Merkert P, Smeets R, Heiland M, Blake F, Schmelzle R, Izbicki JR: Single nucleotide polymorphism in esophageal cancer related gene 1: an analysis in resected oral squamous cell carcinoma patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009, 38: 779-784. 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.02.021.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Wang YY, Tang HJ, Lu SX: Expression in E.coli of protein encoded by human esophageal cancer related gene-1. Chin J Oncol. 2000, 22: 198-200.Google Scholar
- 24.Wang YY, Wang JB, Liu HL, Tang HJ, Guo LP, Lu SX: ECRG1, a novel esophageal gene, cloned and identified from human esophagus and its inhibition effect on tumors. Carcinogenesis. 2008, 29: 157-160.Google Scholar
- 25.Wang JB, Fan Y, Guo LP, Lu SX: Search for interacting proteins of esophageal cancer related gene-1 encoded protein through the yeast two-hybrid system. Chin J Oncol. 2002, 24: 219-221.Google Scholar
- 27.Zhao NX, Huang G, Guo LP, Lu SX: ECRG1, a novel candidate of tumor suppressor gene in the esophageal carcinoma, triggers a senescent program in NIH3T3 cells. Exp Biol Med. 2006, 231: 84-90.Google Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/11/52/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.