BMC Neuroscience

, 8:P18 | Cite as

Stability of splay states for pulse-coupled neuronal networks: finite size versus finite pulse-width effects

  • Alessandro Torcini
  • Ruediger Zillmer
  • Roberto Livi
  • Antonio Politi
Open Access
Poster presentation
  • 1.4k Downloads

Keywords

Neuronal Network Continuum Limit Fire Neuron Firing State Interspike Interval 

The dynamics of collective states observed in globally coupled neuronal networks is still an open problem. In particular, although it is claimed that the periodic firing state ("splay state") is stable only for excitatory coupling [1], counterexamples have been found for inhibitory coupling as well [2]. Moreover, the stability of the splay states has been analyzed only in the mean field limit [1, 3, 4]. Our aim is to investigate simultaneously, for a pulse-coupled network of leaky integrate-and fire neurons, the effect of the number N of neurons as well as of the pulse-width of the post-synaptic potentials. Finite-N networks can be studied by suitably modifying the map-like formalism [5, 6] usually adopted to implement numerically the model. As a result, we find that the stability of the splay state depends crucially on a parameter that is proportional to the width of the delivered pulses rescaled to the average interspike interval. More precisely, we show that the Floquet spectrum of eigenvalues is made of two components, one of which coincides with that one predicted by the mean-field analysis [1]. Depending on the value of the relevant parameter, the second component may be responsible for the occurrence of instabilities which in turn suggest the failure of the continuum limit approximation. Finally, for sufficiently small pulse-width we observe that the splay state can be stable even for inhibitory coupling.

References

  1. 1.
    Abbott LF, van Vreeswijk C: Asynchronous states in networks of pulse-coupled oscillators. Phys Rev E. 1993, 48: 1483-1490. 10.1103/PhysRevE.48.1483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zillmer R, Livi R, Politi A, Torcini A: Desynchronization in diluted neural networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2006, 74: 036203-10.1103/PhysRevE.74.036203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    van Vreeswijk C: Partial synchronization in population of pulse-coupled oscillators. Phys Rev E. 1996, 54: 5522-5537. 10.1103/PhysRevE.54.5522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mohanty PK, Politi A: A new approach to partial synchronization in globally coupled rotators. J Phys A: Math Gen. 2006, 39: L415-L418. 10.1088/0305-4470/39/26/L01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jin Z: Fast convergence of spike sequences to periodic patterns in recurrent networks. Phys Rev Lett. 2002, 89: 208102-10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.208102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bressloff PC, Coombes S: A dynamical theory of spike train transitions in networks of integrate-and-fire oscillators. SIAM J Appl Math. 2000, 60: 820-841. 10.1137/S0036139998339643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Torcini et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessandro Torcini
    • 1
    • 3
  • Ruediger Zillmer
    • 1
    • 3
  • Roberto Livi
    • 2
    • 3
  • Antonio Politi
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto dei Sistemi Complessi – CNRSesto FiorentinoItaly
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsSesto FiorentinoItaly
  3. 3.Istituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareSesto FiorentinoItaly

Personalised recommendations