The Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) worm is a well-studied biological organism model. The nervous system of C. elegans is particularly appealing to study, since it is a tractable fully functional neuronal network for which electro-physical connectivity map (connectome) is fully resolved [1, 2]. In a recent work, we succeeded in establishing a computational dynamical model for the C. elegans nervous system and showed that robust oscillatory movements in motor neurons along the body can be invoked by constant current excitation of command sensory neurons (e.g. PLM neurons associated with forward crawling) and that their activation corresponds to low-dimensional Hopf bifurcation [3]. While these first results validated the model, it is exciting to learn how the nervous system transforms its oscillatory dynamics to the muscles to support robust full body movements (e.g. forward crawling) [4]. Moreover, using methods generically applicable to other neuronal circuits, it is intriguing to understand the optimal sensory stimulations that cause these movements to persist.
We explore these questions by modeling the C. elegans musculature as a viscoelastic rod with discrete rigid segments [5], and map the neuronal dynamics such that they activate the muscles and deform the rod (Fig. 1A). When motor neuron activity stimulates muscles [2], this activation is translated into force applied to the rod, which moves in accordance with the physical properties of C. elegans. By stimulating the command PLM neurons, we establish for the first time that motor neuron dynamics are indeed producing coherent oscillatory full body movements that resemble forward crawling (Fig. 1B, videos available here: http://faculty.washington.edu/shlizee/celegans/).
We utilize our computational full body model to determine the appropriate sensory input for behavior, such as crawling, to persist after explicit external stimulation (touch) has ceased, as observed in experiments [5]. Since such persistence could be explained by a feedback loop between the environment and sensory neurons (Fig. 1C), we propose an adaptive control algorithm that extends existing recursive least squares-based algorithms (e.g. FORCE [6]). Our algorithm finds weights for synaptic input using a low-dimensional projection of motor neuron dynamics, and is capable of finding sensory input patterns that will lead to the desired movement.
References
Varshney LR, Chen BL, Paniagua E, Hall DH, Chklovskii DB: Structural Properties of the Caenorhabditis elegans Neuronal Network. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011, 7 (2): 1001066-
Sengupta P, Samuel ADT: Caenorhabditis elegans: a model system for systems neuroscience. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2009, 19 (6): 1-7.
Kunert J, Shlizerman E, Kutz JN: Low-dimensional functionality of complex network dynamics: Neurosensory integration in the Caenorhabditis elegans connectome. Phys Rev E. 2014, 89 (5): 052805-
McMillen T, Williams T, Holmes P: Nonlinear Muscles, Passive Viscoelasticity and Body Taper Conspire To Create Neuromechanical Phase Lags in Anguilliform Swimmers. PLoS Comput Biol. 2008, 4 (8): 1000157-
Backholm M, Ryu WS, Dalnoki-Veress K: Viscoelastic properties of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, a self-similar, shear-thinning worm. PNAS. 2013, 110 (12): 4528-4533.
Sussillo D, Abbott LF: Generating Coherent Patterns of Activity from Chaotic Neural Networks. Neuron. 2009, 63 (4): 544-557.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Santos, J., Shlizerman, E. Closing the loop: optimal stimulation of C. elegans neuronal network via adaptive control to exhibit full body movements. BMC Neurosci 16 (Suppl 1), O14 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-16-S1-O14
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-16-S1-O14