Comparison of OQPSK and CPM for Communications at 60 GHz with a Nonideal Front End

  • Jimmy Nsenga
  • Wim Van Thillo
  • François Horlin
  • André Bourdoux
  • Rudy Lauwereins
Open Access
Research Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Millimeter-Wave Wireless Communication Systems: Theory and Applications

Abstract

Short-range digital communications at 60 GHz have recently received a lot of interest because of the huge bandwidth available at those frequencies. The capacity offered to the users could finally reach 2 Gbps, enabling the deployment of new multimedia applications. However, the design of analog components is critical, leading to a possible high nonideality of the front end (FE). The goal of this paper is to compare the suitability of two different air interfaces characterized by a low peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) to support communications at 60 GHz. On one hand, we study the offset-QPSK (OQPSK) modulation combined with a channel frequency-domain equalization (FDE). On the other hand, we study the class of continuous phase modulations (CPM) combined with a channel time-domain equalizer (TDE). We evaluate their performance in terms of bit error rate (BER) considering a typical indoor propagation environment at 60 GHz. For both air interfaces, we analyze the degradation caused by the phase noise (PN) coming from the local oscillators; and by the clipping and quantization errors caused by the analog-to-digital converter (ADC); and finally by the nonlinearity in the PA.

Keywords

Error Rate System Application Phase Noise Digital Communication Quantization Error 

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Motlagh BM, Gunnarsson SE, Ferndahl M, Zirath H: Fully integrated 60-GHz single-ended resistive mixer in 90-nm CMOS technology. IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters 2006,16(1):25-27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smulders PFM, Wagemans AG: Wide-band measurements of MM-wave indoor radio channels. Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC '92), October 1992, Boston, Mass, USA 329-333.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yang H, Smulders PFM, Herben MHAJ: Frequency selectivity of 60-GHz LOS and NLOS indoor radio channels. Proceedings of the 63rd IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC '06), May 2006, Melbourne, Australia 6: 2727-2731.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Falconer D, Ariyavisitakul SL, Benyamin-Seeyar A, Eidson B: Frequency domain equalization for single-carrier broadband wireless systems. IEEE Communications Magazine 2002,40(4):58-66. 10.1109/35.995852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sundberg C-E: Continuous phase modulation. IEEE Communications Magazine 1986,24(4):25-38.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Laurent PA: Exact and approximate construction of digital phase modulations by superposition of amplitude modulated pulses (AMP). IEEE Transactions on Communications 1986,34(2):150-160. 10.1109/TCOM.1986.1096504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rimoldi BE: Decomposition approach to CPM. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 1988,34(2):260-270. 10.1109/18.2634MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smulders P: Exploiting the 60 GHz band for local wireless multimedia access: prospects and future directions. IEEE Communications Magazine 2002,40(1):140-147. 10.1109/35.978061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anderson CR, Rappaport TS: In-building wideband partition loss measurements at 2.5 and 60 GHz. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 2004,3(3):922-928. 10.1109/TWC.2004.826328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smulders PFM, Correia LM: Characterisation of propagation in 60 GHz radio channels. Electronics and Communication Engineering Journal 1997,9(2):73-80. 10.1049/ecej:19970204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davies R, Bensebti M, Beach MA, McGeehan JP: Wireless propagation measurements in indoor multipath environments at 1.7 GHz and 60 GHz for small cell systems. Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC '91), May 1991, St. Louis, Mo, USA 589-593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smulders PFM, Vervuurt GJAP: Influence of antenna radiation patterns on MM-wave indoor radio channels . Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Universal Personal Communications, October 1993, Ottawa, Ont, Canada 2: 631-635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saleh AAM, Valenzuela RA: Statistical model for indoor multipath propagation. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 1987,5(2):128-137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Park J-H, Kim Y, Hur Y-S, Lim K, Kim K-H: Analysis of 60 GHz band indoor wireless channels with channel configurations. Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC '98), September 1998, Boston, Mass, USA 2: 617-620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bourdoux A, Liu J: Transceiver nonidealities in multiantenna systems. In Smart Antennas—State of the Art. Hindawi, New York, NY, USA; 2005:651-682. chapter 3Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dardari D: Exact analysis of joint clipping and quantization effects in high speed WLAN receivers. IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC '03), May 2003, Anchorage, Alaska, USA 5: 3487-3492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Engels M: Wireless OFDM Systems: How to Make Them Work?. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, Mass, USA; 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cao C, Kenneth KO:Millimeter-wave voltage-controlled oscillators in 0.13-/splOpen image in new window/m CMOS technology. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 2006,41(6):1297-1304. 10.1109/JSSC.2006.874321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Couch LW II: Digital and Analog Communication Systems. 6th edition. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA; 2001.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang Z, Giannakis GB: Wireless multicarrier communications. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 2000,17(3):29-48. 10.1109/79.841722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Horlin F, Vandendorpe L: A comparison between chip fractional and non-fractional sampling for a direct sequence CDMA receiver. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 2002,50(7):1713-1723. 10.1109/TSP.2002.1011211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Klein A, Kaleh GK, Baier PW: Zero forcing and minimum mean-square-error equalization for multiuser detection in code-division multiple-access channels. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 1996,45(2):276-287. 10.1109/25.492851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Al-Dhahir N, Saulnier G: A high-performance reduced-complexity GMSK demodulator. IEEE Transactions on Communications 1998,46(11):1409-1412. 10.1109/26.729380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Murota K, Hirade K: GMSK modulation for digital mobile radio telephony. IEEE Transactions on Communications Systems 1981,29(7):1044-1050. 10.1109/TCOM.1981.1095089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Proakis JG: Digital Communications. 4th edition. McGraw-Hill, Boston, Mass, USA; 2001.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kaleh GK: Simple coherent receivers for partial response continuous phase modulation. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 1989,7(9):1427-1436. 10.1109/49.44586CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Jimmy Nsenga et al. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jimmy Nsenga
    • 1
    • 2
  • Wim Van Thillo
    • 1
    • 2
  • François Horlin
    • 1
  • André Bourdoux
    • 1
  • Rudy Lauwereins
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.IMECLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Departement Elektrotechniek - ESATKatholieke Universiteit LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations