Skip to main content
Log in

Universality in movie rating distributions

  • Interdisciplinary Physics
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper histograms of user ratings for movies (1\(\bigstar\),...,10\(\bigstar\)) are analysed. The evolving stabilised shapes of histograms follow the rule that all are either double- or triple-peaked. Moreover, at most one peak can be on the central bins 2\(\bigstar\),...,9\(\bigstar\) and the distribution in these bins looks smooth `Gaussian-like’ while changes at the extremes (1\(\bigstar\) and 10\(\bigstar\)) often look abrupt. It is shown that this is well approximated under the assumption that histograms are confined and discretised probability density functions of Lévy skew α-stable distributions. These distributions are the only stable distributions which could emerge due to a generalized central limit theorem from averaging of various independent random variables as which one can see the initial opinions of users. Averaging is also an appropriate assumption about the social process which underlies the process of continuous opinion formation. Surprisingly, not the normal distribution achieves the best fit over histograms observed on the web, but distributions with fat tails which decay as power-laws with exponent –(1+α) \((\alpha=\frac{4}{3})\). The scale and skewness parameters of the Lévy skew α-stable distributions seem to depend on the deviation from an average movie (with mean about 7.6\(\bigstar\)). The histogram of such an average movie has no skewness and is the most narrow one. If a movie deviates from average the distribution gets broader and skew. The skewness pronounces the deviation. This is used to construct a one parameter fit which gives some evidence of universality in processes of continuous opinion dynamics about taste.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Asch, Scientific American 193, 31 (1955)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. I. Lorge, D. Fox, J. Davitz, M. Brenner, Psychological Bulletin 55, 337 (1958)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Sherif, C. Hovland, Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 1961)

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Forgas, European Journal of Social Psychology 7, 175 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. N. Friedkin, American Sociological Review 64, 856 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Salganik, P. Dodds, D. Watts, Science 311, 854 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. W. Mason, F. Conrey, E. Smith, Personality and Social Psychology Review 11, 279 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Deffuant, D. Neau, F. Amblard, G. Weisbuch, Advances in Complex Systems 3, 87 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Hegselmann, U. Krause, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 5, 2 (2002), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/5/3/2.html

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Urbig, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 6, 2 (2003), http://www.jasss.surrey.ac.uk/6/1/2.html

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Deffuant, D. Neau, F. Amblard, G. Weisbuch, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 5, (2002)

  12. W. Jager, F. Amblard, Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 10, 295 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. L. Salzarulo, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 9, 13 (2006), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/9/1/13.html

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Baldassarri, P. Bearman, American Sociological Review 72, 784 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. D. Stauffer, AIP Conf. Proc. 779, 56 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Lorenz, Int. J. Modern Physics C 18, 1819 (2007)

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. C. Castellano, S. Fortunato, V. Loreto, Rev. Modern Physics 81, 591 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. D. Turnbull, in CHI ’07: CHI ’07 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (ACM, 2007), pp. 2705–2710

  19. J. Lorenz, in Managing Complexity: Insights, Concepts, Applications, edited by D. Helbing (Springer, 2008)

  20. C. Dellarocas, Management Science 49, 1407 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. K. Goldberg, T. Roeder, D. Gupta, C. Perkins, Information Retrieval 4, 133 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. K. Cheung, J. Kwok, M. Law, K. Tsui, Decision Support Systems 35, 231 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Umyarov, A. Tuzhilin, Leveraging aggregate ratings for better recommendations, in RecSys ’07: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM conference on Recommender systems (ACM, 2007), pp. 161–164

  24. D.M. Chance, E. Hillebrand, J.E. Hilliard, Management Science 54, 1015 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. B.J. Jiang, P.Y. Chen, SSRN eLibrary (2007)

  26. D. Cosley, S. Lam, I. Albert, J. Konstan, J. Riedl, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 585–592 (2003)

  27. X. Li, L.M. Hitt, Information Systems Research 19, 456 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. F. Wu, B.A. Huberman, Arxiv preprint [arXiv: 0805.3537] (2008)

  29. C. Dellarocas, R. Narayan, Statistical Science 21, 277 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. C. Borghesi, J.P. Bouchaud, Quality and Quantity 41, 557 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. B. Gu, M. Lin, The Dynamics of Online Consumer Reviews, in Workshop on Information Systems and Economics (WISE) (2006)

  32. I looked at all movies with more than 20 000 ratings on IMDb.com in March 2008. These were identified by IMDb “Power Search”-function. These were 1086 histograms

  33. J.P. Nolan, Stable Distributions — Models for Heavy Tailed Data (Birkhäuser, 2010), in progress, Chap. 1 online at academic2.american.edu/∼jpnolan

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Lorenz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lorenz, J. Universality in movie rating distributions. Eur. Phys. J. B 71, 251–258 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2009-00283-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2009-00283-3

PACS

Navigation