Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling spatio-temporal field evolution

  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prediction of spatio-temporal field evolution is based on the extraction of a physical law from joint experimental data. This extraction is usually described by a set of differential equations. If the only source of information is a field record, a method of field generators based on nonparametric modeling by conditional average can successfully replace differential equations. In this article we apply the method of field generators to a two-dimensional chaotic field record that describes the asynchronous motion of high-amplitude striations. We show how to choose the model structure in order to optimize the quality of the prediction process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • I. Grabec, W. Sachse, Synergetics of Measurement, Prediction and Control (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997)

  • J.C.G. Lesurf, Information and Measurement (Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, 2002)

  • I. Grabec, Eur. Phys. J. B 22, 129 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Grabec, Eur. Phys. J. B 48, 279 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Casdagli, S. Eubank, Nonlinear Modeling and Forecasting (Santa Fe Institute: Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1992)

  • H.D.I. Abarbanel, R. Brown, J.J. Sidorowich, L.S. Tsimring, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 1331 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • E.J. Kostelich, T. Schreiber, Phys. Rev. E 48, 1752 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Kantz, T. Schreiber, Nonlinear Time Series Analysis (Cambridge University Press, 1997)

  • S. Siegert, R. Friedrich, J. Peinke, Phys. Lett. A 243, 275 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Friedrich, S. Siegert, J. Peinke, St. Lück, M. Siefert, M. Lindemann, J. Raethjen, G. Deuschl, G. Pfister, Phys. Lett. A 271, 217 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • A.K. Alparslan, M. Sayar, A.R. Atilgan, Phys. Rev. E 58, 2640 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • C.R. Shalizi, e-print arXiv:math/0305160v2

  • D.M. Rubin, Chaos 2, 525 (1992)

  • I. Grabec, S. Mandelj, Biological and Artificial Computation: From Neuroscience to Technology: Proc., edited by J. Mira, R. Moreno-Diaz, J. Cebestany, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Springer-Verlag, Berlin) 1240, 597 (1997)

  • S. Ørstavik, J. Stark, Phys. Lett. A 247, 145 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • U. Parlitz, C. Merkwirth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1890 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Mandelj, I. Grabec, E. Govekar, CIRP J. Manuf. Syst. 30, 281 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • L.Z. Guo, S.S. Mei, S.A. Billings, Int. J. Syst. Sci. 28, 1 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • L.Z. Guo, S.A. Billings, IEEE T. Automat. Contr. 52, 622 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Lopez, A. Alvarez, E. Hernandez-Garcia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2300 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Francisco, P. Muruganandam, Phys. Rev. E 67, 066204 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Muruganandam, G. Francisco, Pramana J. Phys. 64, 381 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Stinis, Multiscale Model. Simul. 2, 580 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Caires, J.A. Ferreira, Stat. Infer. Stoch. Process 8, 151 (2005) Correction 9, 109 (2006)

  • S. Mandelj, I. Grabec, E. Govekar, Int. Jour. Bifur. Chaos 14, 2011 (2004)

  • J. Ramsay, G. Hooker, D. Campbell, J. Cao, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 69, 741 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • F.C. Richards, T.P. Meyer, N.H. Packard, Physica D 45, 189 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Jänicke, A. Wiebel, G. Scheuermann, W. Kollmann, IEEE T. Vis. Comput. Gr. 13, 1384 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • C.R. Shalizi, R. Haslinger, J.-B. Rouquier, K.L. Klinkner, C. Moore, Phys. Rev. E 73, 036104 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • C.R. Shalizi, K.L. Shalizi, R. Haslinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 118701-1 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Ljung, System Identification – Theory for the User, 2nd edn. (Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1999)

  • A. Borštnik Bračič, E. Govekar, I. Grabec, DCDIS A Supplement, Advances in Neural Networks 14(S1), 227 (2007)

  • S.K. Sahu, K.V. Mardia, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. C-APP 54, 223 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • I.L. Dryden, L. Markus, C.C. Taylor, J. Kovacs, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. C-APP 54, 673 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • E.A. Nadaraya, Theory Probab. Appl. 9, 141 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • H.U. Voss, M.J. Bünner, M. Abel, Phys. Rev. E 57, 2820 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Bär, R. Hegger, H. Kantz, Phys. Rev. E 59, 337 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • H.U. Voss, P. Kolodner, M. Abel, J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 3422 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • R.O. Duda, P.E. Hart, Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis (J. Wiley and Sons, New York, 1973), Chap. 4

  • D. Bosq, Nonparametric Statistics for Stochastic Processes: Estimation and Prediction, 2nd edn. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998)

  • L. Wasserman, All of Nonparametric Statistics (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2005)

  • I. Grabec, e-print arXiv:0704.0162

  • S. Haykin, Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation, 2nd edn. (Macmillan College Publishing Company, New York, 1999)

  • I. Grabec, I. Ferkolj, D. Grabec, D. Grošelj, DCDIS A Supplement, Advances in Neural Networks 14(S1), 602 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Grabec, S. Mandelj, Phys. Lett. A 287, 105 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Borštnik Bračič.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Borštnik Bračič, A., Grabec, I. & Govekar, E. Modeling spatio-temporal field evolution. Eur. Phys. J. B 69, 529–538 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2009-00202-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2009-00202-8

PACS

Navigation